好奇号火星车在火星上探测甲烷的可靠性受到质疑

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Sébastien Viscardy, David C. Catling, Kevin Zahnle
{"title":"好奇号火星车在火星上探测甲烷的可靠性受到质疑","authors":"Sébastien Viscardy,&nbsp;David C. Catling,&nbsp;Kevin Zahnle","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, the Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) on NASA's Curiosity rover has reported several detections of methane on Mars, attracting attention due to the potential astrobiological implications of its presence. Here, we re-analyze published TLS data, identifying issues in data robustness and reduction. We find that the TLS foreoptics chamber typically contained methane abundances that were 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those reported in the sample cell, alongside unexpected and rapidly varying pressure changes inside the instrument. Using information from unreported experiments where methane diffusion into the cell was observed, we estimate a gas transport coefficient and develop a model to simulate gas exchanges between the two compartments in typical experiments, investigating the implications for methane measurements. We find that tiny leaks (&lt;0.1% of foreoptics methane) would suffice to explain the reported atmospheric methane measurements—leaks that are otherwise undetectable from housekeeping data. Furthermore, in an analysis of five experiments where more complete data are available, we find that the TLS retrieval method—which averages discrepant methane levels from the three lines of the R3 triplet as if the three lines were independent, rather than fitting the spectrum to the distinctive pattern of the triplet itself—likely underestimates uncertainties. The probability that three methane levels from individual triplet lines are disparate in all five experiments is typically ∼10<sup>−3</sup>, suggesting the presence of systematic errors that are unaccounted for in previously reported methane levels. Finally, we propose a constructive two-step experiment to further investigate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008441","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the Reliability of Methane Detections on Mars by the Curiosity Rover\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Viscardy,&nbsp;David C. Catling,&nbsp;Kevin Zahnle\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over the past decade, the Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) on NASA's Curiosity rover has reported several detections of methane on Mars, attracting attention due to the potential astrobiological implications of its presence. Here, we re-analyze published TLS data, identifying issues in data robustness and reduction. We find that the TLS foreoptics chamber typically contained methane abundances that were 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those reported in the sample cell, alongside unexpected and rapidly varying pressure changes inside the instrument. Using information from unreported experiments where methane diffusion into the cell was observed, we estimate a gas transport coefficient and develop a model to simulate gas exchanges between the two compartments in typical experiments, investigating the implications for methane measurements. We find that tiny leaks (&lt;0.1% of foreoptics methane) would suffice to explain the reported atmospheric methane measurements—leaks that are otherwise undetectable from housekeeping data. Furthermore, in an analysis of five experiments where more complete data are available, we find that the TLS retrieval method—which averages discrepant methane levels from the three lines of the R3 triplet as if the three lines were independent, rather than fitting the spectrum to the distinctive pattern of the triplet itself—likely underestimates uncertainties. The probability that three methane levels from individual triplet lines are disparate in all five experiments is typically ∼10<sup>−3</sup>, suggesting the presence of systematic errors that are unaccounted for in previously reported methane levels. Finally, we propose a constructive two-step experiment to further investigate our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008441\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008441\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年里,美国宇航局好奇号火星车上的可调谐激光光谱仪(TLS)报告了火星上几次甲烷的探测,由于其存在的潜在天体生物学意义而引起了人们的关注。在这里,我们重新分析了已发布的TLS数据,确定了数据鲁棒性和简化方面的问题。我们发现,TLS前光学室通常含有的甲烷丰度比样品室中报告的甲烷丰度高3-4个数量级,同时仪器内的压力变化出乎意料且迅速变化。利用未报道的甲烷扩散实验的信息,我们估计了气体传输系数,并建立了一个模型来模拟典型实验中两个隔间之间的气体交换,研究甲烷测量的意义。我们发现微小的泄漏(前光学甲烷的0.1%)足以解释报告的大气甲烷测量结果——否则从内务数据中无法检测到的泄漏。此外,在对五个实验的分析中,我们发现TLS检索方法——从R3三重态的三条线中平均不同的甲烷水平,就好像三条线是独立的一样,而不是将光谱拟合到三重态本身的独特模式——可能低估了不确定性。在所有五个实验中,来自单个三联系的三个甲烷水平不同的概率通常为~ 10−3,这表明存在先前报道的甲烷水平中未考虑到的系统误差。最后,我们提出了一个建设性的两步实验来进一步研究我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Questioning the Reliability of Methane Detections on Mars by the Curiosity Rover

Questioning the Reliability of Methane Detections on Mars by the Curiosity Rover

Over the past decade, the Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) on NASA's Curiosity rover has reported several detections of methane on Mars, attracting attention due to the potential astrobiological implications of its presence. Here, we re-analyze published TLS data, identifying issues in data robustness and reduction. We find that the TLS foreoptics chamber typically contained methane abundances that were 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those reported in the sample cell, alongside unexpected and rapidly varying pressure changes inside the instrument. Using information from unreported experiments where methane diffusion into the cell was observed, we estimate a gas transport coefficient and develop a model to simulate gas exchanges between the two compartments in typical experiments, investigating the implications for methane measurements. We find that tiny leaks (<0.1% of foreoptics methane) would suffice to explain the reported atmospheric methane measurements—leaks that are otherwise undetectable from housekeeping data. Furthermore, in an analysis of five experiments where more complete data are available, we find that the TLS retrieval method—which averages discrepant methane levels from the three lines of the R3 triplet as if the three lines were independent, rather than fitting the spectrum to the distinctive pattern of the triplet itself—likely underestimates uncertainties. The probability that three methane levels from individual triplet lines are disparate in all five experiments is typically ∼10−3, suggesting the presence of systematic errors that are unaccounted for in previously reported methane levels. Finally, we propose a constructive two-step experiment to further investigate our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信