{"title":"深度学习盲对接方法能否用于预测变构化合物?","authors":"Eric A. Chen, and , Yingkai Zhang*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.5c0033110.1021/acs.jcim.5c00331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Allosteric compounds offer an alternative mode of inhibition to orthosteric compounds with opportunities for selectivity and noncompetition. Structure-based drug design (SBDD) of allosteric compounds introduces complications compared to their orthosteric counterparts; multiple binding sites of interest are considered, and often allosteric binding is only observed in particular protein conformations. Blind docking methods show potential in virtual screening allosteric ligands, and deep learning methods, such as DiffDock, achieve state-of-the-art performance on protein–ligand complex prediction benchmarks compared to traditional docking methods such as Vina and Lin_F9. To this aim, we explore the utility of a data-driven platform called the minimum distance matrix representation (MDMR) to retrospectively predict recently discovered allosteric inhibitors complexed with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) 2. In contrast to other protein complex representations, it uses the minimum residue–residue (or residue–ligand) distance as a feature that prioritizes the formation of interactions. Analysis of this representation highlights the variety of protein conformations and ligand binding modes, and we identify an intermediate protein conformation that other heuristic-based kinase conformation classification methods do not distinguish. Next, we design self- and cross-docking benchmarks to assess whether docking methods can predict both orthosteric and allosteric binding modes and if prospective success is conditional on the selection of the protein receptor conformation, respectively. We find that a combined method, DiffDock followed by Lin_F9 Local Re-Docking (DiffDock + LRD), can predict both orthosteric and allosteric binding modes, and the intermediate conformation must be selected to predict the allosteric pose. In summary, this work highlights the value of a data-driven method to explore protein conformations and ligand binding modes and outlines the challenges of SBDD of allosteric compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":"65 7","pages":"3737–3748 3737–3748"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00331","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Deep Learning Blind Docking Methods be Used to Predict Allosteric Compounds?\",\"authors\":\"Eric A. Chen, and , Yingkai Zhang*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jcim.5c0033110.1021/acs.jcim.5c00331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Allosteric compounds offer an alternative mode of inhibition to orthosteric compounds with opportunities for selectivity and noncompetition. Structure-based drug design (SBDD) of allosteric compounds introduces complications compared to their orthosteric counterparts; multiple binding sites of interest are considered, and often allosteric binding is only observed in particular protein conformations. Blind docking methods show potential in virtual screening allosteric ligands, and deep learning methods, such as DiffDock, achieve state-of-the-art performance on protein–ligand complex prediction benchmarks compared to traditional docking methods such as Vina and Lin_F9. To this aim, we explore the utility of a data-driven platform called the minimum distance matrix representation (MDMR) to retrospectively predict recently discovered allosteric inhibitors complexed with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) 2. In contrast to other protein complex representations, it uses the minimum residue–residue (or residue–ligand) distance as a feature that prioritizes the formation of interactions. Analysis of this representation highlights the variety of protein conformations and ligand binding modes, and we identify an intermediate protein conformation that other heuristic-based kinase conformation classification methods do not distinguish. Next, we design self- and cross-docking benchmarks to assess whether docking methods can predict both orthosteric and allosteric binding modes and if prospective success is conditional on the selection of the protein receptor conformation, respectively. We find that a combined method, DiffDock followed by Lin_F9 Local Re-Docking (DiffDock + LRD), can predict both orthosteric and allosteric binding modes, and the intermediate conformation must be selected to predict the allosteric pose. In summary, this work highlights the value of a data-driven method to explore protein conformations and ligand binding modes and outlines the challenges of SBDD of allosteric compounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling \",\"volume\":\"65 7\",\"pages\":\"3737–3748 3737–3748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00331\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00331\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
变构化合物为正构化合物提供了另一种抑制模式,具有选择性和非竞争性。基于结构的药物设计(SBDD)的变构化合物引入的并发症相比,他们的正构对口;考虑了多个感兴趣的结合位点,通常只在特定的蛋白质构象中观察到变构结合。盲对接方法在虚拟筛选变构配体方面显示出潜力,而与传统对接方法(如Vina和Lin_F9)相比,深度学习方法(如DiffDock)在蛋白质-配体复合物预测基准上取得了最先进的性能。为此,我们探索了一种称为最小距离矩阵表示(MDMR)的数据驱动平台的效用,以回顾性预测最近发现的与细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK) 2络合的变构抑制剂。与其他蛋白质复合物表征相比,它使用最小残基-残基(或残基-配体)距离作为优先形成相互作用的特征。对这种表示的分析突出了蛋白质构象和配体结合模式的多样性,并且我们确定了其他启发式基于激酶构象分类方法无法区分的中间蛋白质构象。接下来,我们设计了自对接和交叉对接基准,分别评估对接方法是否可以预测正构和变构结合模式,以及未来的成功是否取决于蛋白质受体构象的选择。我们发现DiffDock + Lin_F9 Local Re-Docking (DiffDock + LRD)组合方法可以同时预测正构和变构结合模式,并且必须选择中间构象来预测变构位姿。总之,这项工作强调了数据驱动方法在探索蛋白质构象和配体结合模式方面的价值,并概述了变构化合物的SBDD的挑战。
Can Deep Learning Blind Docking Methods be Used to Predict Allosteric Compounds?
Allosteric compounds offer an alternative mode of inhibition to orthosteric compounds with opportunities for selectivity and noncompetition. Structure-based drug design (SBDD) of allosteric compounds introduces complications compared to their orthosteric counterparts; multiple binding sites of interest are considered, and often allosteric binding is only observed in particular protein conformations. Blind docking methods show potential in virtual screening allosteric ligands, and deep learning methods, such as DiffDock, achieve state-of-the-art performance on protein–ligand complex prediction benchmarks compared to traditional docking methods such as Vina and Lin_F9. To this aim, we explore the utility of a data-driven platform called the minimum distance matrix representation (MDMR) to retrospectively predict recently discovered allosteric inhibitors complexed with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) 2. In contrast to other protein complex representations, it uses the minimum residue–residue (or residue–ligand) distance as a feature that prioritizes the formation of interactions. Analysis of this representation highlights the variety of protein conformations and ligand binding modes, and we identify an intermediate protein conformation that other heuristic-based kinase conformation classification methods do not distinguish. Next, we design self- and cross-docking benchmarks to assess whether docking methods can predict both orthosteric and allosteric binding modes and if prospective success is conditional on the selection of the protein receptor conformation, respectively. We find that a combined method, DiffDock followed by Lin_F9 Local Re-Docking (DiffDock + LRD), can predict both orthosteric and allosteric binding modes, and the intermediate conformation must be selected to predict the allosteric pose. In summary, this work highlights the value of a data-driven method to explore protein conformations and ligand binding modes and outlines the challenges of SBDD of allosteric compounds.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery.
Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field.
As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.