{"title":"钢筋混凝土梁柱节点抗剪强度与破坏模式预测的自适应仿真与数据驱动混合模型","authors":"Vikas Mehta, Sung Hyun Jang, Min Ho Chey","doi":"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the key factors influencing failure modes and shear strength in interior reinforced concrete beam-column joints (<em>RCBCJs</em>) using an integrated machine learning framework. A dataset of 200 experimental records was analyzed, with Principal Component Analysis (<em>PCA</em>) refining essential parameters and the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (<em>SMOTE</em>) addressing class imbalance through the generation of 136 synthetic instances, equilibrating the minority class to 140 samples. Five classification and regression algorithms were evaluated, with the Random Forest (<em>RF</em>) model demonstrating superior predictive performance. For shear strength prediction, the <em>RF</em> model achieved a training relative absolute error (<em>RAE</em>) of 0.11 and a coefficient of determination (<em>R</em>² = 0.99), outperforming conventional design codes (<em>ACI</em> 318–14, <em>EN</em>1998-I:2004). Testing yielded an <em>RAE</em> of 0.27 and <em>R</em>² = 0.94, demonstrating robust generalizability. In failure mode classification, the model attained 98 % training accuracy and 84 % testing accuracy, surpassing the performance of empirical code-based methods.</div><div>SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed beam width (<em>b</em><sub><em>b</em></sub>) and column height (<em>h</em><sub><em>c</em></sub>) as the most influential factors for failure modes (mean absolute SHAP = 0.09 and 0.05). For shear strength, column height (<em>h</em><sub><em>c</em></sub>) had the highest impact (mean absolute SHAP = 76.52), followed by top (<em>A</em><sub><em>sb,top</em></sub>; 64.02) and bottom (<em>A</em><sub><em>sb,bot</em></sub>; 54.74) beam reinforcement areas. The <em>RF</em> model consistently surpassed existing design standards, validating its capacity to capture complex parameter interactions. To bridge research and practice, a user-friendly graphical user interface (<em>GUI</em>) was developed, enabling streamlined <em>RCBCJ</em> design optimization by integrating data-driven insights with structural engineering principles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48642,"journal":{"name":"Structures","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 108835"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptive simulation and data-driven hybrid modeling for predicting shear strength and failure modes of interior reinforced concrete beam-column joints\",\"authors\":\"Vikas Mehta, Sung Hyun Jang, Min Ho Chey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the key factors influencing failure modes and shear strength in interior reinforced concrete beam-column joints (<em>RCBCJs</em>) using an integrated machine learning framework. A dataset of 200 experimental records was analyzed, with Principal Component Analysis (<em>PCA</em>) refining essential parameters and the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (<em>SMOTE</em>) addressing class imbalance through the generation of 136 synthetic instances, equilibrating the minority class to 140 samples. Five classification and regression algorithms were evaluated, with the Random Forest (<em>RF</em>) model demonstrating superior predictive performance. For shear strength prediction, the <em>RF</em> model achieved a training relative absolute error (<em>RAE</em>) of 0.11 and a coefficient of determination (<em>R</em>² = 0.99), outperforming conventional design codes (<em>ACI</em> 318–14, <em>EN</em>1998-I:2004). Testing yielded an <em>RAE</em> of 0.27 and <em>R</em>² = 0.94, demonstrating robust generalizability. In failure mode classification, the model attained 98 % training accuracy and 84 % testing accuracy, surpassing the performance of empirical code-based methods.</div><div>SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed beam width (<em>b</em><sub><em>b</em></sub>) and column height (<em>h</em><sub><em>c</em></sub>) as the most influential factors for failure modes (mean absolute SHAP = 0.09 and 0.05). For shear strength, column height (<em>h</em><sub><em>c</em></sub>) had the highest impact (mean absolute SHAP = 76.52), followed by top (<em>A</em><sub><em>sb,top</em></sub>; 64.02) and bottom (<em>A</em><sub><em>sb,bot</em></sub>; 54.74) beam reinforcement areas. The <em>RF</em> model consistently surpassed existing design standards, validating its capacity to capture complex parameter interactions. To bridge research and practice, a user-friendly graphical user interface (<em>GUI</em>) was developed, enabling streamlined <em>RCBCJ</em> design optimization by integrating data-driven insights with structural engineering principles.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structures\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425006496\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352012425006496","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adaptive simulation and data-driven hybrid modeling for predicting shear strength and failure modes of interior reinforced concrete beam-column joints
This study investigates the key factors influencing failure modes and shear strength in interior reinforced concrete beam-column joints (RCBCJs) using an integrated machine learning framework. A dataset of 200 experimental records was analyzed, with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) refining essential parameters and the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) addressing class imbalance through the generation of 136 synthetic instances, equilibrating the minority class to 140 samples. Five classification and regression algorithms were evaluated, with the Random Forest (RF) model demonstrating superior predictive performance. For shear strength prediction, the RF model achieved a training relative absolute error (RAE) of 0.11 and a coefficient of determination (R² = 0.99), outperforming conventional design codes (ACI 318–14, EN1998-I:2004). Testing yielded an RAE of 0.27 and R² = 0.94, demonstrating robust generalizability. In failure mode classification, the model attained 98 % training accuracy and 84 % testing accuracy, surpassing the performance of empirical code-based methods.
SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed beam width (bb) and column height (hc) as the most influential factors for failure modes (mean absolute SHAP = 0.09 and 0.05). For shear strength, column height (hc) had the highest impact (mean absolute SHAP = 76.52), followed by top (Asb,top; 64.02) and bottom (Asb,bot; 54.74) beam reinforcement areas. The RF model consistently surpassed existing design standards, validating its capacity to capture complex parameter interactions. To bridge research and practice, a user-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) was developed, enabling streamlined RCBCJ design optimization by integrating data-driven insights with structural engineering principles.
期刊介绍:
Structures aims to publish internationally-leading research across the full breadth of structural engineering. Papers for Structures are particularly welcome in which high-quality research will benefit from wide readership of academics and practitioners such that not only high citation rates but also tangible industrial-related pathways to impact are achieved.