全静脉麻醉下皮层、皮层下、脑干和自主神经对伤害感觉的反应

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Sérgio Vide M.D., Ph.D , Matthias Kreuzer Ph.D , Ana Ferreira Ph.D , Mafalda Couto Ph.D , Mercè Agustí M.D. Ph.D , Sebastian Jaramillo M.D , Gerhard Schneider M.D., Ph.D , Paul S. García M.D. Ph.D , Fernando Abelha M.D., Ph.D , Pedro Amorim M.D , Iñaki Trocóniz Ph.D , Merlin Larson M.D., Ph.D , Pedro Gambús M.D. Ph.D
{"title":"全静脉麻醉下皮层、皮层下、脑干和自主神经对伤害感觉的反应","authors":"Sérgio Vide M.D., Ph.D ,&nbsp;Matthias Kreuzer Ph.D ,&nbsp;Ana Ferreira Ph.D ,&nbsp;Mafalda Couto Ph.D ,&nbsp;Mercè Agustí M.D. Ph.D ,&nbsp;Sebastian Jaramillo M.D ,&nbsp;Gerhard Schneider M.D., Ph.D ,&nbsp;Paul S. García M.D. Ph.D ,&nbsp;Fernando Abelha M.D., Ph.D ,&nbsp;Pedro Amorim M.D ,&nbsp;Iñaki Trocóniz Ph.D ,&nbsp;Merlin Larson M.D., Ph.D ,&nbsp;Pedro Gambús M.D. Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physiological responses to nociception are complex and involve intricate associations between the central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous systems. To optimize intraoperative analgesic titration, several monitoring devices have been developed, each targeting specific physiologic variables. However, existing devices primarily focus on isolated components of the nociceptive response, such as autonomic or cortical activity, without integrating these perspectives comprehensively.</div><div>Our aim was to compare the performance of different nociception monitors in response to standardized tetanic stimulation and to investigate the correlation between these monitors' responses and varying concentrations of remifentanil.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we evaluated and compared the responses of the Nociception Level index (NOL), Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), Pupillary Reflex Dilation (PRD) and both raw and processed electroencephalogram (EEG) under varying concentrations of propofol and remifentanil. Standardized tetanic stimuli were administered to patients under general anesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. EEG, PRD, NOL, ANI, heart rate (HR), Bispectral index (BIS), and CONOX monitor indices (qCON and qNOX) were concomitantly recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ANI, BIS, HR, NOL, PRD, and qNOX significantly changed after noxious stimulation. In our dataset, PRD had the strongest correlation with varying remifentanil concentrations, while ANI, NOL, and qNOX did not show significant correlations with remifentanil concentrations. Following a noxious stimulus, the raw EEG in patients with low PRD exhibited a significant increase in power in the high EEG frequencies around 25 Hz and decreased power in frequencies corresponding to the alpha range (8–12 Hz) in the power spectral density.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PRD, HR, and BIS correlated with varying levels of remifentanil, with PRD exhibiting the strongest correlation. When CE remifentanil are low, noxious stimuli are more likely to dilate the pupil and be detected in the EEG. Considering the complexity of the nociceptive response, integrating multimodal neurophysiologic monitoring with pharmacological data may improve the anesthesiologist's ability to assess on the nociception-antinociception balance. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings and address the study's limitations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 111825"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cortical, subcortical, brainstem and autonomic responses to nociception under total intravenous anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Sérgio Vide M.D., Ph.D ,&nbsp;Matthias Kreuzer Ph.D ,&nbsp;Ana Ferreira Ph.D ,&nbsp;Mafalda Couto Ph.D ,&nbsp;Mercè Agustí M.D. Ph.D ,&nbsp;Sebastian Jaramillo M.D ,&nbsp;Gerhard Schneider M.D., Ph.D ,&nbsp;Paul S. García M.D. Ph.D ,&nbsp;Fernando Abelha M.D., Ph.D ,&nbsp;Pedro Amorim M.D ,&nbsp;Iñaki Trocóniz Ph.D ,&nbsp;Merlin Larson M.D., Ph.D ,&nbsp;Pedro Gambús M.D. Ph.D\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physiological responses to nociception are complex and involve intricate associations between the central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous systems. To optimize intraoperative analgesic titration, several monitoring devices have been developed, each targeting specific physiologic variables. However, existing devices primarily focus on isolated components of the nociceptive response, such as autonomic or cortical activity, without integrating these perspectives comprehensively.</div><div>Our aim was to compare the performance of different nociception monitors in response to standardized tetanic stimulation and to investigate the correlation between these monitors' responses and varying concentrations of remifentanil.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this study, we evaluated and compared the responses of the Nociception Level index (NOL), Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), Pupillary Reflex Dilation (PRD) and both raw and processed electroencephalogram (EEG) under varying concentrations of propofol and remifentanil. Standardized tetanic stimuli were administered to patients under general anesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. EEG, PRD, NOL, ANI, heart rate (HR), Bispectral index (BIS), and CONOX monitor indices (qCON and qNOX) were concomitantly recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ANI, BIS, HR, NOL, PRD, and qNOX significantly changed after noxious stimulation. In our dataset, PRD had the strongest correlation with varying remifentanil concentrations, while ANI, NOL, and qNOX did not show significant correlations with remifentanil concentrations. Following a noxious stimulus, the raw EEG in patients with low PRD exhibited a significant increase in power in the high EEG frequencies around 25 Hz and decreased power in frequencies corresponding to the alpha range (8–12 Hz) in the power spectral density.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PRD, HR, and BIS correlated with varying levels of remifentanil, with PRD exhibiting the strongest correlation. When CE remifentanil are low, noxious stimuli are more likely to dilate the pupil and be detected in the EEG. Considering the complexity of the nociceptive response, integrating multimodal neurophysiologic monitoring with pharmacological data may improve the anesthesiologist's ability to assess on the nociception-antinociception balance. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings and address the study's limitations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000856\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000856","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对伤害感觉的生理反应是复杂的,涉及中枢神经系统、外周神经系统和自主神经系统之间的复杂联系。为了优化术中镇痛滴定,已经开发了几种监测设备,每种设备针对特定的生理变量。然而,现有的设备主要关注伤害性反应的孤立成分,如自主神经或皮层活动,而没有全面整合这些观点。我们的目的是比较不同的痛感监测器对标准化破伤风刺激的反应,并研究这些监测器的反应与不同浓度的瑞芬太尼之间的相关性。方法评价和比较不同浓度异丙酚和瑞芬太尼对大鼠痛觉水平指数(NOL)、镇痛痛觉指数(ANI)、瞳孔反射舒张(PRD)及原始和处理脑电图(EEG)的影响。对全麻患者进行标准的破伤风刺激,同时靶控输注异丙酚和瑞芬太尼。同时记录脑电图(EEG)、PRD、NOL、ANI、心率(HR)、双谱指数(BIS)和CONOX监测指标(qCON和qNOX)。结果sani、BIS、HR、NOL、PRD和qNOX在有害刺激后发生显著变化。在我们的数据集中,PRD与不同瑞芬太尼浓度的相关性最强,而ANI、NOL和qNOX与瑞芬太尼浓度的相关性不显著。在受到有害刺激后,低PRD患者的原始脑电图在25 Hz左右的高频率上表现出显著的功率增加,而在功率谱密度的α范围(8-12 Hz)对应的频率上表现出功率下降。结论sprd、HR、BIS与瑞芬太尼水平相关,其中PRD相关性最强。当瑞芬太尼浓度较低时,有害刺激更有可能扩大瞳孔,并在脑电图中被检测到。考虑到伤害性反应的复杂性,将多模式神经生理监测与药理学数据相结合可以提高麻醉师评估伤害性-抗伤害性平衡的能力。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现并解决研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cortical, subcortical, brainstem and autonomic responses to nociception under total intravenous anesthesia

Background

Physiological responses to nociception are complex and involve intricate associations between the central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous systems. To optimize intraoperative analgesic titration, several monitoring devices have been developed, each targeting specific physiologic variables. However, existing devices primarily focus on isolated components of the nociceptive response, such as autonomic or cortical activity, without integrating these perspectives comprehensively.
Our aim was to compare the performance of different nociception monitors in response to standardized tetanic stimulation and to investigate the correlation between these monitors' responses and varying concentrations of remifentanil.

Methods

In this study, we evaluated and compared the responses of the Nociception Level index (NOL), Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), Pupillary Reflex Dilation (PRD) and both raw and processed electroencephalogram (EEG) under varying concentrations of propofol and remifentanil. Standardized tetanic stimuli were administered to patients under general anesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. EEG, PRD, NOL, ANI, heart rate (HR), Bispectral index (BIS), and CONOX monitor indices (qCON and qNOX) were concomitantly recorded.

Results

ANI, BIS, HR, NOL, PRD, and qNOX significantly changed after noxious stimulation. In our dataset, PRD had the strongest correlation with varying remifentanil concentrations, while ANI, NOL, and qNOX did not show significant correlations with remifentanil concentrations. Following a noxious stimulus, the raw EEG in patients with low PRD exhibited a significant increase in power in the high EEG frequencies around 25 Hz and decreased power in frequencies corresponding to the alpha range (8–12 Hz) in the power spectral density.

Conclusions

PRD, HR, and BIS correlated with varying levels of remifentanil, with PRD exhibiting the strongest correlation. When CE remifentanil are low, noxious stimuli are more likely to dilate the pupil and be detected in the EEG. Considering the complexity of the nociceptive response, integrating multimodal neurophysiologic monitoring with pharmacological data may improve the anesthesiologist's ability to assess on the nociception-antinociception balance. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings and address the study's limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信