Channel C. McLewis, Sylvia Hurtado, Edwin Perez, Denise Ortiz, N. Angie Jaimez Noel
{"title":"跨机构指导:促进stem干预中多样性、公平性和包容性的催化剂","authors":"Channel C. McLewis, Sylvia Hurtado, Edwin Perez, Denise Ortiz, N. Angie Jaimez Noel","doi":"10.1002/sce.21930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bold interventions are needed to change racial disparities and unacceptably low STEMM completion rates at historically white institutions that have the resources to train a new generation of scientists with diverse backgrounds. Three university case studies were conducted on the Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership, which sought to develop student-centered programs to improve student outcomes and change STEMM institutional cultures. We employ an institutionally-focused approach to examine how the collaboration facilitated the development and mutual learning of equity-minded schemas to challenge dominant racial logic that stifles diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM. The study expounds on how dialogic cross-institutional mentoring works, including how participants learned from each other at multiple levels across institutions to advance fundamental values and practices that hold promise for inclusive approaches in STEMM. The study shows how mentoring relationships support change agents in implementing, sustaining, and institutionalizing STEMM interventions that seek to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion on their campuses. Discussed is the value of the cross-institutional mentoring model to share and co-create innovative strategies, expand professional development for institutional agents, affirm change agents, and overcome program challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"109 3","pages":"745-768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.21930","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Institutional Mentoring: A Catalyst for Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Channel C. McLewis, Sylvia Hurtado, Edwin Perez, Denise Ortiz, N. Angie Jaimez Noel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sce.21930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bold interventions are needed to change racial disparities and unacceptably low STEMM completion rates at historically white institutions that have the resources to train a new generation of scientists with diverse backgrounds. Three university case studies were conducted on the Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership, which sought to develop student-centered programs to improve student outcomes and change STEMM institutional cultures. We employ an institutionally-focused approach to examine how the collaboration facilitated the development and mutual learning of equity-minded schemas to challenge dominant racial logic that stifles diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM. The study expounds on how dialogic cross-institutional mentoring works, including how participants learned from each other at multiple levels across institutions to advance fundamental values and practices that hold promise for inclusive approaches in STEMM. The study shows how mentoring relationships support change agents in implementing, sustaining, and institutionalizing STEMM interventions that seek to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion on their campuses. Discussed is the value of the cross-institutional mentoring model to share and co-create innovative strategies, expand professional development for institutional agents, affirm change agents, and overcome program challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"109 3\",\"pages\":\"745-768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.21930\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21930\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-Institutional Mentoring: A Catalyst for Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Interventions
Bold interventions are needed to change racial disparities and unacceptably low STEMM completion rates at historically white institutions that have the resources to train a new generation of scientists with diverse backgrounds. Three university case studies were conducted on the Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership, which sought to develop student-centered programs to improve student outcomes and change STEMM institutional cultures. We employ an institutionally-focused approach to examine how the collaboration facilitated the development and mutual learning of equity-minded schemas to challenge dominant racial logic that stifles diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM. The study expounds on how dialogic cross-institutional mentoring works, including how participants learned from each other at multiple levels across institutions to advance fundamental values and practices that hold promise for inclusive approaches in STEMM. The study shows how mentoring relationships support change agents in implementing, sustaining, and institutionalizing STEMM interventions that seek to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion on their campuses. Discussed is the value of the cross-institutional mentoring model to share and co-create innovative strategies, expand professional development for institutional agents, affirm change agents, and overcome program challenges.
期刊介绍:
Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]