跨机构指导:促进stem干预中多样性、公平性和包容性的催化剂

IF 3.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Channel C. McLewis, Sylvia Hurtado, Edwin Perez, Denise Ortiz, N. Angie Jaimez Noel
{"title":"跨机构指导:促进stem干预中多样性、公平性和包容性的催化剂","authors":"Channel C. McLewis,&nbsp;Sylvia Hurtado,&nbsp;Edwin Perez,&nbsp;Denise Ortiz,&nbsp;N. Angie Jaimez Noel","doi":"10.1002/sce.21930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bold interventions are needed to change racial disparities and unacceptably low STEMM completion rates at historically white institutions that have the resources to train a new generation of scientists with diverse backgrounds. Three university case studies were conducted on the Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership, which sought to develop student-centered programs to improve student outcomes and change STEMM institutional cultures. We employ an institutionally-focused approach to examine how the collaboration facilitated the development and mutual learning of equity-minded schemas to challenge dominant racial logic that stifles diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM. The study expounds on how dialogic cross-institutional mentoring works, including how participants learned from each other at multiple levels across institutions to advance fundamental values and practices that hold promise for inclusive approaches in STEMM. The study shows how mentoring relationships support change agents in implementing, sustaining, and institutionalizing STEMM interventions that seek to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion on their campuses. Discussed is the value of the cross-institutional mentoring model to share and co-create innovative strategies, expand professional development for institutional agents, affirm change agents, and overcome program challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"109 3","pages":"745-768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.21930","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Institutional Mentoring: A Catalyst for Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Channel C. McLewis,&nbsp;Sylvia Hurtado,&nbsp;Edwin Perez,&nbsp;Denise Ortiz,&nbsp;N. Angie Jaimez Noel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sce.21930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Bold interventions are needed to change racial disparities and unacceptably low STEMM completion rates at historically white institutions that have the resources to train a new generation of scientists with diverse backgrounds. Three university case studies were conducted on the Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership, which sought to develop student-centered programs to improve student outcomes and change STEMM institutional cultures. We employ an institutionally-focused approach to examine how the collaboration facilitated the development and mutual learning of equity-minded schemas to challenge dominant racial logic that stifles diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM. The study expounds on how dialogic cross-institutional mentoring works, including how participants learned from each other at multiple levels across institutions to advance fundamental values and practices that hold promise for inclusive approaches in STEMM. The study shows how mentoring relationships support change agents in implementing, sustaining, and institutionalizing STEMM interventions that seek to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion on their campuses. Discussed is the value of the cross-institutional mentoring model to share and co-create innovative strategies, expand professional development for institutional agents, affirm change agents, and overcome program challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"109 3\",\"pages\":\"745-768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sce.21930\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21930\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

需要采取大胆的干预措施,以改变历史上的白人院校中存在的种族差异和 STEMM 完成率低得令人无法接受的情况,这些院校拥有培养具有不同背景的新一代科学家的资源。我们对三所大学的迈耶霍夫适应伙伴关系(Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership)进行了案例研究,该伙伴关系旨在开发以学生为中心的项目,以提高学生成绩并改变 STEMM 院校文化。我们采用了一种以机构为重点的方法,来研究这种合作是如何促进具有公平意识的模式的发展和相互学习,以挑战在 STEMM 中扼杀多样性、公平性和包容性的主流种族逻辑的。本研究阐述了对话式跨机构指导是如何发挥作用的,包括参与者如何在跨机构的多个层面相互学习,以推进有望在 STEMM 中实现包容性方法的基本价值观和实践。研究表明,指导关系如何支持变革推动者实施、维持 STEMM 干预措施并使之制度化,从而在其校园内推进多样性、公平性和包容性。研究还讨论了跨机构指导模式在分享和共创创新战略、扩大机构代理的专业发展、肯定变革代理以及克服计划挑战方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Institutional Mentoring: A Catalyst for Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEMM Interventions

Bold interventions are needed to change racial disparities and unacceptably low STEMM completion rates at historically white institutions that have the resources to train a new generation of scientists with diverse backgrounds. Three university case studies were conducted on the Meyerhoff Adaptation Partnership, which sought to develop student-centered programs to improve student outcomes and change STEMM institutional cultures. We employ an institutionally-focused approach to examine how the collaboration facilitated the development and mutual learning of equity-minded schemas to challenge dominant racial logic that stifles diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM. The study expounds on how dialogic cross-institutional mentoring works, including how participants learned from each other at multiple levels across institutions to advance fundamental values and practices that hold promise for inclusive approaches in STEMM. The study shows how mentoring relationships support change agents in implementing, sustaining, and institutionalizing STEMM interventions that seek to advance diversity, equity, and inclusion on their campuses. Discussed is the value of the cross-institutional mentoring model to share and co-create innovative strategies, expand professional development for institutional agents, affirm change agents, and overcome program challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信