电气化仍在进行中?对 14 个欧洲城市电动交通政策组合的定性比较分析

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Tobias Held , Lasse Gerrits
{"title":"电气化仍在进行中?对 14 个欧洲城市电动交通政策组合的定性比较分析","authors":"Tobias Held ,&nbsp;Lasse Gerrits","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A major concern for policymakers in European cities is to identify the right policy mix that promotes the diffusion of battery electric vehicles (BEV's). Existing research focuses mainly on the effect of fiscal policies at the national, aggregated level. Consequently, less is known about policy mixes that include monetary and non-monetary policies implemented at both the national and local level. Building on prior research, we deploy a two-step fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of BEV policies in 14 European cities to identify policy mixes that successfully promote the urban adoption of BEV's.</div><div>We find two policy mixes that promote BEV uptake. First, recurring monetary and non-monetary policies that address behavioral aspects of BEV-usage at the local level in conjunction with monetary incentives for home and workplace charging points as well as on-street residential charging points successfully propel BEV uptake. Second, the presence of monetary incentives for home and workplace charging points, as well as on-street residential charging points in conjunction with policies disincentivizing conventional car usage promote the adoption of BEV's.</div><div>Our study shows that BEV policies must be tailored carefully across different policy levels and individually to BEV-user contexts in cities. QCA provides a helpful tool for evaluating BEV policy mixes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Still on track for electrification? A qualitative comparative analysis of e-mobility policy mixes in 14 European cities\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Held ,&nbsp;Lasse Gerrits\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A major concern for policymakers in European cities is to identify the right policy mix that promotes the diffusion of battery electric vehicles (BEV's). Existing research focuses mainly on the effect of fiscal policies at the national, aggregated level. Consequently, less is known about policy mixes that include monetary and non-monetary policies implemented at both the national and local level. Building on prior research, we deploy a two-step fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of BEV policies in 14 European cities to identify policy mixes that successfully promote the urban adoption of BEV's.</div><div>We find two policy mixes that promote BEV uptake. First, recurring monetary and non-monetary policies that address behavioral aspects of BEV-usage at the local level in conjunction with monetary incentives for home and workplace charging points as well as on-street residential charging points successfully propel BEV uptake. Second, the presence of monetary incentives for home and workplace charging points, as well as on-street residential charging points in conjunction with policies disincentivizing conventional car usage promote the adoption of BEV's.</div><div>Our study shows that BEV policies must be tailored carefully across different policy levels and individually to BEV-user contexts in cities. QCA provides a helpful tool for evaluating BEV policy mixes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Mobility\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于欧洲城市的政策制定者来说,一个主要问题是确定正确的政策组合,以促进纯电动汽车(BEV)的推广。现有的研究主要集中在国家总体财政政策的影响上。因此,人们对包括在国家和地方一级执行的货币和非货币政策在内的政策组合知之甚少。在先前研究的基础上,我们对14个欧洲城市的电动汽车政策进行了两步模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA),以确定成功促进城市采用电动汽车的政策组合。我们发现了两种促进纯电动汽车吸收的政策组合。首先,在地方层面解决电动汽车使用行为方面的经常性货币和非货币政策,以及对家庭和工作场所充电点以及街道住宅充电点的货币激励,成功地推动了电动汽车的普及。其次,对家庭和工作场所充电站的货币激励,以及街道上的住宅充电站,再加上限制传统汽车使用的政策,促进了纯电动汽车的采用。我们的研究表明,纯电动汽车政策必须在不同的政策层面上精心定制,并根据城市纯电动汽车用户的具体情况量身定制。QCA为评估纯电动汽车政策组合提供了一个有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Still on track for electrification? A qualitative comparative analysis of e-mobility policy mixes in 14 European cities
A major concern for policymakers in European cities is to identify the right policy mix that promotes the diffusion of battery electric vehicles (BEV's). Existing research focuses mainly on the effect of fiscal policies at the national, aggregated level. Consequently, less is known about policy mixes that include monetary and non-monetary policies implemented at both the national and local level. Building on prior research, we deploy a two-step fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of BEV policies in 14 European cities to identify policy mixes that successfully promote the urban adoption of BEV's.
We find two policy mixes that promote BEV uptake. First, recurring monetary and non-monetary policies that address behavioral aspects of BEV-usage at the local level in conjunction with monetary incentives for home and workplace charging points as well as on-street residential charging points successfully propel BEV uptake. Second, the presence of monetary incentives for home and workplace charging points, as well as on-street residential charging points in conjunction with policies disincentivizing conventional car usage promote the adoption of BEV's.
Our study shows that BEV policies must be tailored carefully across different policy levels and individually to BEV-user contexts in cities. QCA provides a helpful tool for evaluating BEV policy mixes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信