老年患者对医疗决策中人工智能的态度

Moustaq Karim Khan Rony , Tuli Rani Deb , Most. Tahmina Khatun , Latifun Nesa , Jeni Begum , Mahabuba Afrin , Md. Abdun Noor , Mosammat Ruma Akter , Mst. Amena Khatun , Most. Hasina Begum , Mst. Rina Parvin , Fazila Akter
{"title":"老年患者对医疗决策中人工智能的态度","authors":"Moustaq Karim Khan Rony ,&nbsp;Tuli Rani Deb ,&nbsp;Most. Tahmina Khatun ,&nbsp;Latifun Nesa ,&nbsp;Jeni Begum ,&nbsp;Mahabuba Afrin ,&nbsp;Md. Abdun Noor ,&nbsp;Mosammat Ruma Akter ,&nbsp;Mst. Amena Khatun ,&nbsp;Most. Hasina Begum ,&nbsp;Mst. Rina Parvin ,&nbsp;Fazila Akter","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, promising improved diagnostics and efficiency. However, the ethical implications and patient perspectives, particularly among older adults, remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore the ethical considerations and attitudes of older patients toward AI in healthcare decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted qualitative research in the geriatric wards of three hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, using the Technology Acceptance Model and a phenomenological approach as the guiding frameworks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 purposively sampled participants, all aged 60 and above. Data were collected in Bangla, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed through thematic analysis. Methodological rigor was maintained through member checking, triangulation, and reflexive practices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five key themes emerged: (1) Trust and skepticism toward AI’s decision-making capabilities, with concerns about its ability to address nuanced health needs; (2) A strong preference for human interaction over technological efficiency, highlighting the irreplaceable value of empathy; (3) Ethical concerns regarding informed consent, emphasizing the need for transparent and comprehensible AI integration; (4) Apprehension about privacy and data security, reflecting a trust deficit in AI’s handling of sensitive health information; and (5) Mixed perceptions on AI’s role in enhancing or diminishing the quality of care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study underscores the need for transparent, patient-centered AI systems that enhance, rather than replace, human elements in care. Addressing ethical concerns about privacy, autonomy, and informed consent is critical to fostering trust and acceptance among older patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes of older patients toward artificial intelligence in decision-making in healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Moustaq Karim Khan Rony ,&nbsp;Tuli Rani Deb ,&nbsp;Most. Tahmina Khatun ,&nbsp;Latifun Nesa ,&nbsp;Jeni Begum ,&nbsp;Mahabuba Afrin ,&nbsp;Md. Abdun Noor ,&nbsp;Mosammat Ruma Akter ,&nbsp;Mst. Amena Khatun ,&nbsp;Most. Hasina Begum ,&nbsp;Mst. Rina Parvin ,&nbsp;Fazila Akter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, promising improved diagnostics and efficiency. However, the ethical implications and patient perspectives, particularly among older adults, remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore the ethical considerations and attitudes of older patients toward AI in healthcare decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted qualitative research in the geriatric wards of three hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, using the Technology Acceptance Model and a phenomenological approach as the guiding frameworks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 purposively sampled participants, all aged 60 and above. Data were collected in Bangla, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed through thematic analysis. Methodological rigor was maintained through member checking, triangulation, and reflexive practices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five key themes emerged: (1) Trust and skepticism toward AI’s decision-making capabilities, with concerns about its ability to address nuanced health needs; (2) A strong preference for human interaction over technological efficiency, highlighting the irreplaceable value of empathy; (3) Ethical concerns regarding informed consent, emphasizing the need for transparent and comprehensible AI integration; (4) Apprehension about privacy and data security, reflecting a trust deficit in AI’s handling of sensitive health information; and (5) Mixed perceptions on AI’s role in enhancing or diminishing the quality of care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study underscores the need for transparent, patient-centered AI systems that enhance, rather than replace, human elements in care. Addressing ethical concerns about privacy, autonomy, and informed consent is critical to fostering trust and acceptance among older patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X25000179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X25000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)正在迅速改变医疗保健,有望改善诊断和效率。然而,伦理意义和患者观点,特别是在老年人中,仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在探讨老年患者对人工智能在医疗保健决策中的伦理考虑和态度。方法采用技术接受模型和现象学方法作为指导框架,在孟加拉国达卡三家医院的老年病房进行定性研究。对21名年龄在60岁及以上的参与者进行了半结构化访谈。数据以孟加拉语收集,转录,翻译成英语,并通过专题分析进行分析。方法的严谨性是通过成员检查、三角测量和反思实践来保持的。结果出现了五个关键主题:(1)对人工智能决策能力的信任和怀疑,以及对其解决细微健康需求的能力的担忧;(2)对人际互动的偏好高于技术效率,凸显了共情的不可替代性价值;(3)关于知情同意的伦理问题,强调需要透明和可理解的人工智能集成;(4)对隐私和数据安全的担忧,反映出人工智能在处理敏感健康信息方面存在信任赤字;(5)对人工智能在提高或降低医疗质量方面的作用的看法不一。本研究强调需要透明、以患者为中心的人工智能系统,以增强而不是取代护理中的人为因素。解决关于隐私、自主权和知情同意的伦理问题对于促进老年患者的信任和接受至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes of older patients toward artificial intelligence in decision-making in healthcare

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, promising improved diagnostics and efficiency. However, the ethical implications and patient perspectives, particularly among older adults, remain underexplored. This study aimed to explore the ethical considerations and attitudes of older patients toward AI in healthcare decision-making.

Methods

We conducted qualitative research in the geriatric wards of three hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, using the Technology Acceptance Model and a phenomenological approach as the guiding frameworks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 purposively sampled participants, all aged 60 and above. Data were collected in Bangla, transcribed, translated into English, and analyzed through thematic analysis. Methodological rigor was maintained through member checking, triangulation, and reflexive practices.

Results

Five key themes emerged: (1) Trust and skepticism toward AI’s decision-making capabilities, with concerns about its ability to address nuanced health needs; (2) A strong preference for human interaction over technological efficiency, highlighting the irreplaceable value of empathy; (3) Ethical concerns regarding informed consent, emphasizing the need for transparent and comprehensible AI integration; (4) Apprehension about privacy and data security, reflecting a trust deficit in AI’s handling of sensitive health information; and (5) Mixed perceptions on AI’s role in enhancing or diminishing the quality of care.

Conclusions

This study underscores the need for transparent, patient-centered AI systems that enhance, rather than replace, human elements in care. Addressing ethical concerns about privacy, autonomy, and informed consent is critical to fostering trust and acceptance among older patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信