有条件自动驾驶系统使用意愿的跨国差异:技术亲和力、驾驶技能和交通环境感知的影响

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
İbrahim Öztürk , Esko Lehtonen , Ruth Madigan , Yee Mun Lee , Elina Aittoniemi , Natasha Merat
{"title":"有条件自动驾驶系统使用意愿的跨国差异:技术亲和力、驾驶技能和交通环境感知的影响","authors":"İbrahim Öztürk ,&nbsp;Esko Lehtonen ,&nbsp;Ruth Madigan ,&nbsp;Yee Mun Lee ,&nbsp;Elina Aittoniemi ,&nbsp;Natasha Merat","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The importance of public acceptance of automated driving systems (ADS) has grown as these systems have advanced. Previous research has acknowledged the existence of individual and cross-cultural differences in drivers’ willingness to use these systems. This study aimed to further investigate cross-country differences in willingness to use conditionally automated driving systems, and the factors that influence it, such as technology affinity, driving skills, and traffic climate, across eight countries with varying road safety profiles. A large-scale survey was conducted as part of the Hi-Drive project, involving 7896 participants from eight countries (UK, USA, Germany, Sweden, Poland, Greece, China, and Japan). The findings revealed significant cross-country differences in willingness to use ADS, with China having the highest and the United Kingdom having the lowest scores. A mixed-effects model showed that willingness to use ADS was positively associated with technology affinity, driving skills, and external affective demands, and functionality dimensions of Traffic Climate Scale, and negatively associated with internal requirements factor of traffic climate. The results indicate that technology affinity plays a crucial role in influencing willingness to use ADS across countries, while perceptions of driving skills and traffic climate may provide insights into some country and individual-level differences in acceptance of these systems. These findings contribute to our understanding of the acceptance of ADS and the role of individual differences and transport-specific factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102903"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-country differences in willingness to use conditionally automated driving systems: Impact of technology affinity, driving skills, and perceived traffic climate\",\"authors\":\"İbrahim Öztürk ,&nbsp;Esko Lehtonen ,&nbsp;Ruth Madigan ,&nbsp;Yee Mun Lee ,&nbsp;Elina Aittoniemi ,&nbsp;Natasha Merat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The importance of public acceptance of automated driving systems (ADS) has grown as these systems have advanced. Previous research has acknowledged the existence of individual and cross-cultural differences in drivers’ willingness to use these systems. This study aimed to further investigate cross-country differences in willingness to use conditionally automated driving systems, and the factors that influence it, such as technology affinity, driving skills, and traffic climate, across eight countries with varying road safety profiles. A large-scale survey was conducted as part of the Hi-Drive project, involving 7896 participants from eight countries (UK, USA, Germany, Sweden, Poland, Greece, China, and Japan). The findings revealed significant cross-country differences in willingness to use ADS, with China having the highest and the United Kingdom having the lowest scores. A mixed-effects model showed that willingness to use ADS was positively associated with technology affinity, driving skills, and external affective demands, and functionality dimensions of Traffic Climate Scale, and negatively associated with internal requirements factor of traffic climate. The results indicate that technology affinity plays a crucial role in influencing willingness to use ADS across countries, while perceptions of driving skills and traffic climate may provide insights into some country and individual-level differences in acceptance of these systems. These findings contribute to our understanding of the acceptance of ADS and the role of individual differences and transport-specific factors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000934\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-country differences in willingness to use conditionally automated driving systems: Impact of technology affinity, driving skills, and perceived traffic climate
The importance of public acceptance of automated driving systems (ADS) has grown as these systems have advanced. Previous research has acknowledged the existence of individual and cross-cultural differences in drivers’ willingness to use these systems. This study aimed to further investigate cross-country differences in willingness to use conditionally automated driving systems, and the factors that influence it, such as technology affinity, driving skills, and traffic climate, across eight countries with varying road safety profiles. A large-scale survey was conducted as part of the Hi-Drive project, involving 7896 participants from eight countries (UK, USA, Germany, Sweden, Poland, Greece, China, and Japan). The findings revealed significant cross-country differences in willingness to use ADS, with China having the highest and the United Kingdom having the lowest scores. A mixed-effects model showed that willingness to use ADS was positively associated with technology affinity, driving skills, and external affective demands, and functionality dimensions of Traffic Climate Scale, and negatively associated with internal requirements factor of traffic climate. The results indicate that technology affinity plays a crucial role in influencing willingness to use ADS across countries, while perceptions of driving skills and traffic climate may provide insights into some country and individual-level differences in acceptance of these systems. These findings contribute to our understanding of the acceptance of ADS and the role of individual differences and transport-specific factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信