IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Matthew J Lee,Daniel M Baker,Debby Hawkins,Sue Blackwell,Robert Arnott,Deena Harji,Gabrielle Thorpe,Stephen J Chapman,Georgina L Jones,
{"title":"Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for gastrointestinal recovery after surgery (PRO-diGI).","authors":"Matthew J Lee,Daniel M Baker,Debby Hawkins,Sue Blackwell,Robert Arnott,Deena Harji,Gabrielle Thorpe,Stephen J Chapman,Georgina L Jones,","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAfter major abdominal surgery, patients may experience significant gastrointestinal dysfunction, including postoperative ileus. Many clinical tools are used to measure this dysfunction, but there is no patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specific to this group. The aim of this study was to develop a new PROM for this common condition.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA four-stage approach was undertaken. Stage 1 used semi-structured interviews with 29 patients to explore experiences of gastrointestinal recovery and develop a draft questionnaire. Stage 2 solicited feedback from 18 patients and 15 clinical experts on the face validity of the proposed tool using the Questionnaire on Questionnaires (QQ-10). Stage 3 recruited 297 patients to complete the questionnaire. Principal component analysis reduced the items and identified the domain structure. Test-retest reliability and a pilot assessment of responsiveness were assessed in stage 4 in a sample of 100 patients and in a sample of 68 patients respectively.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe interviews generated 26 subthemes across gastrointestinal recovery and general well-being. An initial questionnaire containing 44 items was developed. The QQ-10 demonstrated high value and low burden, supporting face validity. Tests to reduce the items and identify the domain structure resulted in a 15-item questionnaire across four domains (nausea, eating, well-being, and bowels). Test-retest reliability showed intraclass correlation coefficient values ≥0.7 for all domains. Pilot responsiveness was demonstrated through differences in pre- and post-surgical scores.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPRO-diGI is a PROM for gastrointestinal dysfunction after major abdominal surgery that shows good psychometric properties and demonstrates face validity, reliability, and responsiveness. This now needs external validation to facilitate broader implementation.","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景腹部大手术后,患者可能会出现严重的胃肠道功能障碍,包括术后回肠梗阻。许多临床工具都用于测量这种功能障碍,但没有专门针对这类患者的患者报告结果测量指标(PROM)。本研究旨在为这种常见疾病开发一种新的 PROM。第一阶段对 29 名患者进行了半结构式访谈,以了解他们在胃肠道恢复方面的经验,并制定了一份问卷草案。第 2 阶段使用问卷调查表 (QQ-10),征求 18 名患者和 15 名临床专家对拟议工具表面效度的反馈意见。第 3 阶段招募了 297 名患者填写问卷。主成分分析减少了项目并确定了领域结构。第 4 阶段分别对 100 名患者样本和 68 名患者样本进行了重测可靠性和响应性试点评估。最初的问卷包含 44 个项目。QQ-10 显示了高价值和低负担,支持表面效度。为减少项目和确定领域结构而进行的测试产生了一份包含 15 个项目的问卷,横跨四个领域(恶心、饮食、幸福感和肠道)。测试-再测可靠性显示,所有领域的类内相关系数均≥0.7。结论PRO-diGI是一款针对腹部大手术后胃肠功能紊乱的PROM,具有良好的心理测量学特性,并显示出面效度、可靠性和响应性。现在需要外部验证,以促进更广泛的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for gastrointestinal recovery after surgery (PRO-diGI).
BACKGROUND After major abdominal surgery, patients may experience significant gastrointestinal dysfunction, including postoperative ileus. Many clinical tools are used to measure this dysfunction, but there is no patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specific to this group. The aim of this study was to develop a new PROM for this common condition. METHODS A four-stage approach was undertaken. Stage 1 used semi-structured interviews with 29 patients to explore experiences of gastrointestinal recovery and develop a draft questionnaire. Stage 2 solicited feedback from 18 patients and 15 clinical experts on the face validity of the proposed tool using the Questionnaire on Questionnaires (QQ-10). Stage 3 recruited 297 patients to complete the questionnaire. Principal component analysis reduced the items and identified the domain structure. Test-retest reliability and a pilot assessment of responsiveness were assessed in stage 4 in a sample of 100 patients and in a sample of 68 patients respectively. RESULTS The interviews generated 26 subthemes across gastrointestinal recovery and general well-being. An initial questionnaire containing 44 items was developed. The QQ-10 demonstrated high value and low burden, supporting face validity. Tests to reduce the items and identify the domain structure resulted in a 15-item questionnaire across four domains (nausea, eating, well-being, and bowels). Test-retest reliability showed intraclass correlation coefficient values ≥0.7 for all domains. Pilot responsiveness was demonstrated through differences in pre- and post-surgical scores. CONCLUSION PRO-diGI is a PROM for gastrointestinal dysfunction after major abdominal surgery that shows good psychometric properties and demonstrates face validity, reliability, and responsiveness. This now needs external validation to facilitate broader implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信