国家癌症系统特征和全球泛癌症结果

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Edward Christopher Dee, James Fan Wu, Erin Jay G. Feliciano, Frederic Ivan L. Ting, Jonas Willmann, Frances Dominique V. Ho, Bhav Jain, Urvish Jain, Jenny Chen, Fabio Ynoe Moraes, Nancy Y. Lee, Puneeth Iyengar, Paul L. Nguyen
{"title":"国家癌症系统特征和全球泛癌症结果","authors":"Edward Christopher Dee, James Fan Wu, Erin Jay G. Feliciano, Frederic Ivan L. Ting, Jonas Willmann, Frances Dominique V. Ho, Bhav Jain, Urvish Jain, Jenny Chen, Fabio Ynoe Moraes, Nancy Y. Lee, Puneeth Iyengar, Paul L. Nguyen","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceApproximately 29.9 million cancer cases and 15.3 million deaths are anticipated by 2040 globally, necessitating cancer system strengthening. A greater understanding of health system factors that can be leveraged to improve cancer control may guide health system planning.ObjectiveTo evaluate predictors of improved cancer outcomes globally.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis pan-cancer ecological study used the most recent available national health system metrics and cancer statistics, spanning the breadth of global income levels across 185 countries. Estimates of age-standardized mortality to incidence ratios were derived from GLOBOCAN 2022 for patients with cancer of all ages. The analysis took place on November 27, 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresHealth spending as a percent of gross domestic product (GDP), physicians per 1000 population, nurses and midwives per 1000 population, surgical workforce per 1000 population, GDP per capita, Universal Health Coverage (UHC) service coverage index, availability of pathology services, human development index, gender inequality index (GII), radiotherapy centers per 1000 population, and out-of-pocket expenditure as percentage of current health expenditure were collected. The association between the mortality to incidence ratio (MIR) and each metric was evaluated using univariable linear regressions (α = .0045), which were used to construct multivariable models (α = .05). Variation inflation factor allowed exclusion of variables with significant multicollinearity. <jats:italic>R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup></jats:italic> measured goodness of fit.ResultsOn univariable analysis, all metrics were significantly associated with MIR of cancer (<jats:italic>P </jats:italic>&amp;amp;lt;<jats:italic> </jats:italic>.001 for all), including UHC index (β, −0.0076 [95% CI, −0.0083 to −0.0068]), GDP per capita (β, −5.10 × 10<jats:sup>-6</jats:sup> [95% CI, −5.75 × 10<jats:sup>-6</jats:sup> to −4.46 × 10<jats:sup>-6</jats:sup>]), clinical and workforce capacity, radiotherapy capacity (β, −88.25 [95% CI, −100.43 to −76.06]), and gender inequality index (β, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.57-0.70]). After including metrics significant on univariable analysis and correcting for multicollinearity, on multivariable analysis, greater UHC index and GDP per capita were independently associated with lower (improved) MIR for cancer. The multivariable model had <jats:italic>R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup></jats:italic> of 0.87. On multivariable analysis stratified by sex, greater UHC index and greater GDP per capita were independently associated with improved MIR for all cancers. <jats:italic>R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup></jats:italic> for the multivariable models was 0.87 for females and 0.85 for males.ConclusionsThis study found that global health system metrics related to progress toward universal health care, greater health care spending and GDP per capita, strengthened clinical workforce and capacity, and increased gender equity were associated with improved pan-cancer outcomes at a population level on univariable analysis. The degree of UHC and GDP per capita were independently associated with improved cancer outcomes in multivariable models with good explanatory power. These exploratory findings merit further validation and may guide health system planning and prioritization.","PeriodicalId":14850,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Oncology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Cancer System Characteristics and Global Pan-Cancer Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Edward Christopher Dee, James Fan Wu, Erin Jay G. Feliciano, Frederic Ivan L. Ting, Jonas Willmann, Frances Dominique V. Ho, Bhav Jain, Urvish Jain, Jenny Chen, Fabio Ynoe Moraes, Nancy Y. Lee, Puneeth Iyengar, Paul L. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportanceApproximately 29.9 million cancer cases and 15.3 million deaths are anticipated by 2040 globally, necessitating cancer system strengthening. A greater understanding of health system factors that can be leveraged to improve cancer control may guide health system planning.ObjectiveTo evaluate predictors of improved cancer outcomes globally.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis pan-cancer ecological study used the most recent available national health system metrics and cancer statistics, spanning the breadth of global income levels across 185 countries. Estimates of age-standardized mortality to incidence ratios were derived from GLOBOCAN 2022 for patients with cancer of all ages. The analysis took place on November 27, 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresHealth spending as a percent of gross domestic product (GDP), physicians per 1000 population, nurses and midwives per 1000 population, surgical workforce per 1000 population, GDP per capita, Universal Health Coverage (UHC) service coverage index, availability of pathology services, human development index, gender inequality index (GII), radiotherapy centers per 1000 population, and out-of-pocket expenditure as percentage of current health expenditure were collected. The association between the mortality to incidence ratio (MIR) and each metric was evaluated using univariable linear regressions (α = .0045), which were used to construct multivariable models (α = .05). Variation inflation factor allowed exclusion of variables with significant multicollinearity. <jats:italic>R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup></jats:italic> measured goodness of fit.ResultsOn univariable analysis, all metrics were significantly associated with MIR of cancer (<jats:italic>P </jats:italic>&amp;amp;lt;<jats:italic> </jats:italic>.001 for all), including UHC index (β, −0.0076 [95% CI, −0.0083 to −0.0068]), GDP per capita (β, −5.10 × 10<jats:sup>-6</jats:sup> [95% CI, −5.75 × 10<jats:sup>-6</jats:sup> to −4.46 × 10<jats:sup>-6</jats:sup>]), clinical and workforce capacity, radiotherapy capacity (β, −88.25 [95% CI, −100.43 to −76.06]), and gender inequality index (β, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.57-0.70]). After including metrics significant on univariable analysis and correcting for multicollinearity, on multivariable analysis, greater UHC index and GDP per capita were independently associated with lower (improved) MIR for cancer. The multivariable model had <jats:italic>R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup></jats:italic> of 0.87. On multivariable analysis stratified by sex, greater UHC index and greater GDP per capita were independently associated with improved MIR for all cancers. <jats:italic>R<jats:sup>2</jats:sup></jats:italic> for the multivariable models was 0.87 for females and 0.85 for males.ConclusionsThis study found that global health system metrics related to progress toward universal health care, greater health care spending and GDP per capita, strengthened clinical workforce and capacity, and increased gender equity were associated with improved pan-cancer outcomes at a population level on univariable analysis. The degree of UHC and GDP per capita were independently associated with improved cancer outcomes in multivariable models with good explanatory power. These exploratory findings merit further validation and may guide health system planning and prioritization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0473\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0473","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性到2040年,预计全球约有2990万例癌症病例和1530万例死亡,需要加强癌症系统。更好地了解可用于改善癌症控制的卫生系统因素可指导卫生系统规划。目的评价全球癌症预后改善的预测因素。设计、环境和参与者这项泛癌症生态研究使用了最新的国家卫生系统指标和癌症统计数据,涵盖了185个国家的全球收入水平。年龄标准化死亡率与发病率的估计值来自GLOBOCAN 2022,适用于所有年龄段的癌症患者。该分析于2024年11月27日进行。收集卫生支出占国内生产总值(GDP)的百分比、每1000人的医生、每1000人的护士和助产士、每1000人的外科工作人员、人均GDP、全民健康覆盖(UHC)服务覆盖指数、病理服务的可获得性、人类发展指数、性别不平等指数、每1000人的放射治疗中心、以及自费支出占当前卫生支出的百分比。采用单变量线性回归(α = 0.0045)评价病死率与发病率比(MIR)与各指标之间的相关性,并构建多变量模型(α = 0.05)。变异膨胀因子允许排除具有显著多重共线性的变量。R2表示拟合优度。结果单变量分析显示,所有指标均与肿瘤MIR显著相关(P &lt;.001),包括UHC指数(β,−0.0076 [95% CI,−0.0083至−0.0068])、人均GDP (β,−5.10 × 10-6 [95% CI,−5.75 × 10-6至−4.46 × 10-6])、临床和劳动力能力、放疗能力(β,−88.25 [95% CI,−100.43至−76.06])和性别不平等指数(β, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.57-0.70])。在纳入单变量分析和校正多重共线性的显著指标后,在多变量分析中,更高的UHC指数和人均GDP与更低(改善)的癌症MIR独立相关。多变量模型的R2为0.87。在按性别分层的多变量分析中,更高的全民健康覆盖指数和更高的人均GDP与所有癌症MIR的改善独立相关。多变量模型的R2女性为0.87,男性为0.85。本研究发现,在单变量分析中,与全民医疗保健进展、更高的医疗保健支出和人均GDP、加强临床劳动力和能力以及增加性别平等相关的全球卫生系统指标与人群水平上泛癌症结局的改善相关。在多变量模型中,全民健康覆盖程度和人均GDP与癌症预后的改善独立相关,具有良好的解释力。这些探索性发现值得进一步验证,并可能指导卫生系统规划和优先排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Cancer System Characteristics and Global Pan-Cancer Outcomes
ImportanceApproximately 29.9 million cancer cases and 15.3 million deaths are anticipated by 2040 globally, necessitating cancer system strengthening. A greater understanding of health system factors that can be leveraged to improve cancer control may guide health system planning.ObjectiveTo evaluate predictors of improved cancer outcomes globally.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis pan-cancer ecological study used the most recent available national health system metrics and cancer statistics, spanning the breadth of global income levels across 185 countries. Estimates of age-standardized mortality to incidence ratios were derived from GLOBOCAN 2022 for patients with cancer of all ages. The analysis took place on November 27, 2024.Main Outcomes and MeasuresHealth spending as a percent of gross domestic product (GDP), physicians per 1000 population, nurses and midwives per 1000 population, surgical workforce per 1000 population, GDP per capita, Universal Health Coverage (UHC) service coverage index, availability of pathology services, human development index, gender inequality index (GII), radiotherapy centers per 1000 population, and out-of-pocket expenditure as percentage of current health expenditure were collected. The association between the mortality to incidence ratio (MIR) and each metric was evaluated using univariable linear regressions (α = .0045), which were used to construct multivariable models (α = .05). Variation inflation factor allowed exclusion of variables with significant multicollinearity. R2 measured goodness of fit.ResultsOn univariable analysis, all metrics were significantly associated with MIR of cancer (P &amp;lt; .001 for all), including UHC index (β, −0.0076 [95% CI, −0.0083 to −0.0068]), GDP per capita (β, −5.10 × 10-6 [95% CI, −5.75 × 10-6 to −4.46 × 10-6]), clinical and workforce capacity, radiotherapy capacity (β, −88.25 [95% CI, −100.43 to −76.06]), and gender inequality index (β, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.57-0.70]). After including metrics significant on univariable analysis and correcting for multicollinearity, on multivariable analysis, greater UHC index and GDP per capita were independently associated with lower (improved) MIR for cancer. The multivariable model had R2 of 0.87. On multivariable analysis stratified by sex, greater UHC index and greater GDP per capita were independently associated with improved MIR for all cancers. R2 for the multivariable models was 0.87 for females and 0.85 for males.ConclusionsThis study found that global health system metrics related to progress toward universal health care, greater health care spending and GDP per capita, strengthened clinical workforce and capacity, and increased gender equity were associated with improved pan-cancer outcomes at a population level on univariable analysis. The degree of UHC and GDP per capita were independently associated with improved cancer outcomes in multivariable models with good explanatory power. These exploratory findings merit further validation and may guide health system planning and prioritization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Oncology
JAMA Oncology Medicine-Oncology
自引率
1.80%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: JAMA Oncology is an international peer-reviewed journal that serves as the leading publication for scientists, clinicians, and trainees working in the field of oncology. It is part of the JAMA Network, a collection of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信