欧洲主要大田作物的共同播种率:一项大规模农民调查的结果

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
EPPO Bulletin Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1111/epp.13078
A. Kafka, B. Sornin, S. Kragten, A. Alix, B. Midgley, J. Sasturain, S. Haghi Kia, P. Ferraton, M. Lacaze, B. Dubois, L. Maio, A. Mueller
{"title":"欧洲主要大田作物的共同播种率:一项大规模农民调查的结果","authors":"A. Kafka,&nbsp;B. Sornin,&nbsp;S. Kragten,&nbsp;A. Alix,&nbsp;B. Midgley,&nbsp;J. Sasturain,&nbsp;S. Haghi Kia,&nbsp;P. Ferraton,&nbsp;M. Lacaze,&nbsp;B. Dubois,&nbsp;L. Maio,&nbsp;A. Mueller","doi":"10.1111/epp.13078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the European Union (EU), pesticides can only be used by farmers after an acceptable risk to consumers, operators, and the environment has been demonstrated. Plant protection products applied as seed treatments have several environmental advantages compared with foliar spray applications, especially lower use rates and less drift to off-crop habitats. Regulatory risk assessments for seed treatment products in the EU are routinely based on maximum ‘commonly used’ sowing rates. Such assessments may overestimate the true risk as sowing rate distributions can be skewed by atypically high sowing rates, which are often a result of localized conditions. To have a better view of realistic worst-case sowing rates for key field crops (cereals, maize, oilseed rape, sunflower, soybean and sugar beet) grown in the EU, a large-scale farmer survey was conducted in 2020 and 2021 across a representative range of EU countries, and the United Kingdom. The total number of farmers interviewed ranged from 112 (spring oilseed rape) to 14 479 (winter wheat). The number of countries from which farmers were interviewed ranged from three (spring oilseed rape) to 17 (winter wheat). Mean and 90th percentile values of sowing rates were calculated from the survey results per crop and are proposed as more representative worst-case values for use in seed treatment regulatory risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":34952,"journal":{"name":"EPPO Bulletin","volume":"55 1","pages":"108-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epp.13078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common sowing rates of major European field crops: Results of a large-scale farmer survey\",\"authors\":\"A. Kafka,&nbsp;B. Sornin,&nbsp;S. Kragten,&nbsp;A. Alix,&nbsp;B. Midgley,&nbsp;J. Sasturain,&nbsp;S. Haghi Kia,&nbsp;P. Ferraton,&nbsp;M. Lacaze,&nbsp;B. Dubois,&nbsp;L. Maio,&nbsp;A. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epp.13078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the European Union (EU), pesticides can only be used by farmers after an acceptable risk to consumers, operators, and the environment has been demonstrated. Plant protection products applied as seed treatments have several environmental advantages compared with foliar spray applications, especially lower use rates and less drift to off-crop habitats. Regulatory risk assessments for seed treatment products in the EU are routinely based on maximum ‘commonly used’ sowing rates. Such assessments may overestimate the true risk as sowing rate distributions can be skewed by atypically high sowing rates, which are often a result of localized conditions. To have a better view of realistic worst-case sowing rates for key field crops (cereals, maize, oilseed rape, sunflower, soybean and sugar beet) grown in the EU, a large-scale farmer survey was conducted in 2020 and 2021 across a representative range of EU countries, and the United Kingdom. The total number of farmers interviewed ranged from 112 (spring oilseed rape) to 14 479 (winter wheat). The number of countries from which farmers were interviewed ranged from three (spring oilseed rape) to 17 (winter wheat). Mean and 90th percentile values of sowing rates were calculated from the survey results per crop and are proposed as more representative worst-case values for use in seed treatment regulatory risk assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPPO Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"108-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epp.13078\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPPO Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epp.13078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPPO Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epp.13078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧盟(EU),只有在证明对消费者、经营者和环境构成可接受的风险后,农民才能使用农药。与叶面喷施相比,植保产品作为种子处理具有若干环境优势,特别是使用率较低和较少向非作物生境漂移。欧盟对种子处理产品的监管风险评估通常基于最大“常用”播种率。这种评估可能高估了真正的风险,因为播种率分布可能被非典型的高播种率所扭曲,这通常是局部条件的结果。为了更好地了解在欧盟种植的主要大田作物(谷物、玉米、油菜、向日葵、大豆和甜菜)的实际最坏情况下的播种率,我们在2020年和2021年在欧盟国家和英国的代表性范围内进行了一项大规模的农民调查。受访农民总数从112人(春油菜)到14479人(冬小麦)不等。接受采访的农民来自3个国家(春油菜)到17个国家(冬小麦)。播种率的平均值和第90百分位值是根据每一种作物的调查结果计算出来的,并被提议作为种子处理监管风险评估中更有代表性的最坏情况值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Common sowing rates of major European field crops: Results of a large-scale farmer survey

In the European Union (EU), pesticides can only be used by farmers after an acceptable risk to consumers, operators, and the environment has been demonstrated. Plant protection products applied as seed treatments have several environmental advantages compared with foliar spray applications, especially lower use rates and less drift to off-crop habitats. Regulatory risk assessments for seed treatment products in the EU are routinely based on maximum ‘commonly used’ sowing rates. Such assessments may overestimate the true risk as sowing rate distributions can be skewed by atypically high sowing rates, which are often a result of localized conditions. To have a better view of realistic worst-case sowing rates for key field crops (cereals, maize, oilseed rape, sunflower, soybean and sugar beet) grown in the EU, a large-scale farmer survey was conducted in 2020 and 2021 across a representative range of EU countries, and the United Kingdom. The total number of farmers interviewed ranged from 112 (spring oilseed rape) to 14 479 (winter wheat). The number of countries from which farmers were interviewed ranged from three (spring oilseed rape) to 17 (winter wheat). Mean and 90th percentile values of sowing rates were calculated from the survey results per crop and are proposed as more representative worst-case values for use in seed treatment regulatory risk assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EPPO Bulletin
EPPO Bulletin Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, the EPPO Bulletin publishes research findings on all aspects of plant protection, but particularly those of immediate concern to government plant protection services. Papers are published in English and French, with summaries also in Russian.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信