欧盟昆虫和螨虫参考实验室对欧洲食品安全局非针叶寄主上非欧盟孢子虫害虫分类的贡献

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
EPPO Bulletin Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1111/epp.13084
Pascal Rousse, Richard A. Gottsberger, Raphaëlle Mouttet, Helga Reisenzein, Philippe Reynaud
{"title":"欧盟昆虫和螨虫参考实验室对欧洲食品安全局非针叶寄主上非欧盟孢子虫害虫分类的贡献","authors":"Pascal Rousse,&nbsp;Richard A. Gottsberger,&nbsp;Raphaëlle Mouttet,&nbsp;Helga Reisenzein,&nbsp;Philippe Reynaud","doi":"10.1111/epp.13084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was mandated by the European Union (EU) to perform a group pest categorization of exotic Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) whose establishment in the EU territory would present a significant risk in terms of plant health. This should be used to reconsider the listing of ‘Non-European Scolytinae’ as quarantine pests in the current EU Regulation. In a first stage, EFSA short-listed 88 Scolytinae species developing on broadleaf hosts and known for their mobility, having impact levels documented in literature and either absent or with a limited presence in the EU. EFSA then asked the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) to provide comments related to its expertise in the diagnosis of quarantine insects, and to assess the practical and technical implications of including these species in the list submitted for future regulation? The EURL proceeded with a case-by-case examination of these 88 species and ranked the overall feasibility of their identification, from A (both morphological and molecular tools available) to D (none available). Several related issues were also raised. In particular, the molecular identification of Scolytinae using sequences hosted in NCBI GenBank and Bold databases proved to be highly hazardous. The case of the <i>Euwallacea fornicatus</i> complex was also especially problematic because of multiple issues in its taxonomy and in the available tools for the distinction of its constitutive species. As a result, we proposed a list of recommendations for consideration in modifying EFSA's pest categorization and selected the tools to be developed in the next EURL working programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":34952,"journal":{"name":"EPPO Bulletin","volume":"55 1","pages":"117-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epp.13084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribution of the EU Reference Laboratory for Insects and Mites to EFSA's pest categorization of non-EU Scolytinae on non-coniferous hosts\",\"authors\":\"Pascal Rousse,&nbsp;Richard A. Gottsberger,&nbsp;Raphaëlle Mouttet,&nbsp;Helga Reisenzein,&nbsp;Philippe Reynaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epp.13084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was mandated by the European Union (EU) to perform a group pest categorization of exotic Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) whose establishment in the EU territory would present a significant risk in terms of plant health. This should be used to reconsider the listing of ‘Non-European Scolytinae’ as quarantine pests in the current EU Regulation. In a first stage, EFSA short-listed 88 Scolytinae species developing on broadleaf hosts and known for their mobility, having impact levels documented in literature and either absent or with a limited presence in the EU. EFSA then asked the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) to provide comments related to its expertise in the diagnosis of quarantine insects, and to assess the practical and technical implications of including these species in the list submitted for future regulation? The EURL proceeded with a case-by-case examination of these 88 species and ranked the overall feasibility of their identification, from A (both morphological and molecular tools available) to D (none available). Several related issues were also raised. In particular, the molecular identification of Scolytinae using sequences hosted in NCBI GenBank and Bold databases proved to be highly hazardous. The case of the <i>Euwallacea fornicatus</i> complex was also especially problematic because of multiple issues in its taxonomy and in the available tools for the distinction of its constitutive species. As a result, we proposed a list of recommendations for consideration in modifying EFSA's pest categorization and selected the tools to be developed in the next EURL working programme.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPPO Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"117-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epp.13084\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPPO Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epp.13084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPPO Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epp.13084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)受欧盟(EU)的委托,对外来斯科拉蝇(鞘翅目:Curculionidae)进行了一组有害生物分类,这些害虫在欧盟领土上的存在将对植物健康构成重大风险。这应该用于重新考虑当前欧盟法规中将“非欧洲猪瘟虫”列为检疫害虫的清单。在第一阶段,欧洲食品安全局列出了88种在阔叶寄主上发育并以其流动性而闻名的Scolytinae物种,这些物种的影响水平在文献中有记载,在欧盟要么不存在,要么存在有限。欧洲食品安全局随后要求欧盟参考实验室(EURL)就其在检疫昆虫诊断方面的专业知识提供意见,并评估将这些物种列入提交给未来监管的清单的实际和技术影响。EURL对这88个物种进行了个案研究,并对其鉴定的总体可行性进行了排名,从a(可用的形态学和分子工具)到D(不可用)。还提出了几个有关的问题。特别是,利用NCBI GenBank和Bold数据库中的序列对Scolytinae进行分子鉴定是非常危险的。由于其分类学和现有的区分其构成种的工具存在诸多问题,因此对圆尾藻复合体的研究也特别成问题。因此,我们提出了一份建议清单,供修改欧洲食品安全局有害生物分类时考虑,并选择了将在下一个EURL工作计划中开发的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Contribution of the EU Reference Laboratory for Insects and Mites to EFSA's pest categorization of non-EU Scolytinae on non-coniferous hosts

Contribution of the EU Reference Laboratory for Insects and Mites to EFSA's pest categorization of non-EU Scolytinae on non-coniferous hosts

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was mandated by the European Union (EU) to perform a group pest categorization of exotic Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) whose establishment in the EU territory would present a significant risk in terms of plant health. This should be used to reconsider the listing of ‘Non-European Scolytinae’ as quarantine pests in the current EU Regulation. In a first stage, EFSA short-listed 88 Scolytinae species developing on broadleaf hosts and known for their mobility, having impact levels documented in literature and either absent or with a limited presence in the EU. EFSA then asked the European Union Reference Laboratory (EURL) to provide comments related to its expertise in the diagnosis of quarantine insects, and to assess the practical and technical implications of including these species in the list submitted for future regulation? The EURL proceeded with a case-by-case examination of these 88 species and ranked the overall feasibility of their identification, from A (both morphological and molecular tools available) to D (none available). Several related issues were also raised. In particular, the molecular identification of Scolytinae using sequences hosted in NCBI GenBank and Bold databases proved to be highly hazardous. The case of the Euwallacea fornicatus complex was also especially problematic because of multiple issues in its taxonomy and in the available tools for the distinction of its constitutive species. As a result, we proposed a list of recommendations for consideration in modifying EFSA's pest categorization and selected the tools to be developed in the next EURL working programme.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EPPO Bulletin
EPPO Bulletin Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, the EPPO Bulletin publishes research findings on all aspects of plant protection, but particularly those of immediate concern to government plant protection services. Papers are published in English and French, with summaries also in Russian.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信