评估坦桑尼亚国内外银行的效率和可持续性:来自数字化转型时代的见解

IF 4.8 Q1 BUSINESS
Zawadi Ally
{"title":"评估坦桑尼亚国内外银行的效率和可持续性:来自数字化转型时代的见解","authors":"Zawadi Ally","doi":"10.1002/bsd2.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines the efficiency and sustainability of domestic and foreign banks in Tanzania from 2014 to 2023. Employing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with bootstrapped DEA for efficiency assessment and fractional logit regression to identify key determinants, the study provides a robust empirical evaluation of banking performance. The findings reveal that foreign banks demonstrate higher efficiency levels than domestic banks, with mean CCR and BCC scores of 92.2% and 93.6%, respectively, compared to 80.7% and 85.4% for domestic banks. Bootstrapped DEA results indicate that traditional DEA marginally overestimates efficiency levels, yet foreign banks maintain superior performance even after bias correction. The Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test confirms statistically significant differences in efficiency scores (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), supporting the hypothesis that foreign banks operate more efficiently. Fractional logit regression results further reveal that bank size, capital adequacy, and digital adoption positively influence efficiency, whereas asset quality and operational costs exert a negative impact. This study contributes to the resource-based theory, X-efficiency theory, and the theory of technological diffusion by demonstrating how digital transformation enhances efficiency and sustainability. From a practical perspective, the findings offer valuable insights for policymakers, regulators, and banking institutions on optimizing digital banking strategies to improve efficiency and long-term sustainability. By integrating empirical rigor with theoretical depth, this study provides a comprehensive framework for assessing banking performance in developing economies amid digital transformation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36531,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and Development","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Efficiency and Sustainability of Domestic and Foreign Banks in Tanzania: Insights From the Digital Transformation Era\",\"authors\":\"Zawadi Ally\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bsd2.70092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study examines the efficiency and sustainability of domestic and foreign banks in Tanzania from 2014 to 2023. Employing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with bootstrapped DEA for efficiency assessment and fractional logit regression to identify key determinants, the study provides a robust empirical evaluation of banking performance. The findings reveal that foreign banks demonstrate higher efficiency levels than domestic banks, with mean CCR and BCC scores of 92.2% and 93.6%, respectively, compared to 80.7% and 85.4% for domestic banks. Bootstrapped DEA results indicate that traditional DEA marginally overestimates efficiency levels, yet foreign banks maintain superior performance even after bias correction. The Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test confirms statistically significant differences in efficiency scores (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), supporting the hypothesis that foreign banks operate more efficiently. Fractional logit regression results further reveal that bank size, capital adequacy, and digital adoption positively influence efficiency, whereas asset quality and operational costs exert a negative impact. This study contributes to the resource-based theory, X-efficiency theory, and the theory of technological diffusion by demonstrating how digital transformation enhances efficiency and sustainability. From a practical perspective, the findings offer valuable insights for policymakers, regulators, and banking institutions on optimizing digital banking strategies to improve efficiency and long-term sustainability. By integrating empirical rigor with theoretical depth, this study provides a comprehensive framework for assessing banking performance in developing economies amid digital transformation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and Development\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了2014年至2023年坦桑尼亚国内外银行的效率和可持续性。采用数据包络分析(DEA)和自举DEA进行效率评估,并采用分数logit回归识别关键决定因素,为银行绩效提供了稳健的实证评估。研究结果显示,外资银行的效率水平高于国内银行,其CCR和BCC平均得分分别为92.2%和93.6%,而国内银行的CCR和BCC平均得分分别为80.7%和85.4%。自举DEA结果表明,传统DEA略微高估了效率水平,而外资银行即使在偏差修正后仍保持着优越的绩效。Mann-Whitney U检验证实了效率得分的统计学显著差异(p < 0.05),支持外资银行运营效率更高的假设。分数logit回归结果进一步表明,银行规模、资本充足率和数字化采用对效率有正向影响,而资产质量和运营成本则有负向影响。本研究通过论证数字化转型如何提高效率和可持续性,为资源基础理论、x效率理论和技术扩散理论做出了贡献。从实践的角度来看,研究结果为政策制定者、监管机构和银行机构优化数字银行战略以提高效率和长期可持续性提供了宝贵的见解。通过将实证严谨性与理论深度相结合,本研究为评估数字化转型中发展中经济体的银行绩效提供了一个全面的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Efficiency and Sustainability of Domestic and Foreign Banks in Tanzania: Insights From the Digital Transformation Era

This study examines the efficiency and sustainability of domestic and foreign banks in Tanzania from 2014 to 2023. Employing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with bootstrapped DEA for efficiency assessment and fractional logit regression to identify key determinants, the study provides a robust empirical evaluation of banking performance. The findings reveal that foreign banks demonstrate higher efficiency levels than domestic banks, with mean CCR and BCC scores of 92.2% and 93.6%, respectively, compared to 80.7% and 85.4% for domestic banks. Bootstrapped DEA results indicate that traditional DEA marginally overestimates efficiency levels, yet foreign banks maintain superior performance even after bias correction. The Mann–Whitney U test confirms statistically significant differences in efficiency scores (p < 0.05), supporting the hypothesis that foreign banks operate more efficiently. Fractional logit regression results further reveal that bank size, capital adequacy, and digital adoption positively influence efficiency, whereas asset quality and operational costs exert a negative impact. This study contributes to the resource-based theory, X-efficiency theory, and the theory of technological diffusion by demonstrating how digital transformation enhances efficiency and sustainability. From a practical perspective, the findings offer valuable insights for policymakers, regulators, and banking institutions on optimizing digital banking strategies to improve efficiency and long-term sustainability. By integrating empirical rigor with theoretical depth, this study provides a comprehensive framework for assessing banking performance in developing economies amid digital transformation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Business Strategy and Development
Business Strategy and Development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信