在气候和环境危机中,学术成功应该被重新定义吗?五位英国地理学家的对话

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Lucy Clarke, Stephen Tooth, Heather Viles, Daniel Schillereff, Erin Harvey
{"title":"在气候和环境危机中,学术成功应该被重新定义吗?五位英国地理学家的对话","authors":"Lucy Clarke,&nbsp;Stephen Tooth,&nbsp;Heather Viles,&nbsp;Daniel Schillereff,&nbsp;Erin Harvey","doi":"10.1002/geo2.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The academic geographical community is well acquainted with the reality of the current climate and environmental crisis. As such, geographers, higher education institutions and geographical organisations arguably should take a greater lead in responding to this crisis. This raises concerns about how such responses fit into academics' ‘core’ job activities, especially given concern about escalating workloads. What mix of activities could or should constitute academic success? This article is based on a dialogue between five UK-based academic geographers spanning different academic career stages. Drawing on our personal and professional experiences, both in the United Kingdom and overseas, we present an edited version of an online dialogue that addresses three questions: (1) How do we define academic success in the context of the climate and environmental crisis? (2) Given the routine and, in some cases, escalating demands of our jobs, do we feel that we have the capacity to address whatever the appropriate measures of success may be? (3) Do we feel that the measures of success are appropriately valued by our colleagues and by modern university management procedures? Our collective reflections on the key points extracted from the dialogue will likely have resonance beyond the United Kingdom (and university) context. These points include: adjusting and adapting how we portray academic success for different audiences; contemplating broader definitions of academic success; considering where public engagement sits within the portfolio of academic responsibilities; deciding how to respond to multiple pressures; choosing how to prioritise different academic demands; and asking whether work to tackle the climate and environmental crisis is adequately valued. We provide some practical suggestions for redefining academic success that require consideration by the academic geographical community. Wider discussion and implementation should contribute to enhancing job satisfaction and career progression for individual geographers and strengthen academic geography as a discipline.</p>","PeriodicalId":44089,"journal":{"name":"Geo-Geography and Environment","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/geo2.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should academic success be redefined amidst the climate and environmental crisis? A dialogue between five UK geographers\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Clarke,&nbsp;Stephen Tooth,&nbsp;Heather Viles,&nbsp;Daniel Schillereff,&nbsp;Erin Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/geo2.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The academic geographical community is well acquainted with the reality of the current climate and environmental crisis. As such, geographers, higher education institutions and geographical organisations arguably should take a greater lead in responding to this crisis. This raises concerns about how such responses fit into academics' ‘core’ job activities, especially given concern about escalating workloads. What mix of activities could or should constitute academic success? This article is based on a dialogue between five UK-based academic geographers spanning different academic career stages. Drawing on our personal and professional experiences, both in the United Kingdom and overseas, we present an edited version of an online dialogue that addresses three questions: (1) How do we define academic success in the context of the climate and environmental crisis? (2) Given the routine and, in some cases, escalating demands of our jobs, do we feel that we have the capacity to address whatever the appropriate measures of success may be? (3) Do we feel that the measures of success are appropriately valued by our colleagues and by modern university management procedures? Our collective reflections on the key points extracted from the dialogue will likely have resonance beyond the United Kingdom (and university) context. These points include: adjusting and adapting how we portray academic success for different audiences; contemplating broader definitions of academic success; considering where public engagement sits within the portfolio of academic responsibilities; deciding how to respond to multiple pressures; choosing how to prioritise different academic demands; and asking whether work to tackle the climate and environmental crisis is adequately valued. We provide some practical suggestions for redefining academic success that require consideration by the academic geographical community. Wider discussion and implementation should contribute to enhancing job satisfaction and career progression for individual geographers and strengthen academic geography as a discipline.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geo-Geography and Environment\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/geo2.70005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geo-Geography and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.70005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geo-Geography and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.70005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术地理学界对当前气候和环境危机的现实了如指掌。因此,地理学家、高等教育机构和地理组织可以说应该在应对这场危机方面发挥更大的带头作用。这引发了人们的担忧,即这些回应如何适应学者的“核心”工作活动,尤其是考虑到工作量不断增加。什么样的活动组合可以或应该构成学业上的成功?本文基于五位英国学术地理学家之间的对话,他们跨越了不同的学术生涯阶段。根据我们在英国和海外的个人和专业经验,我们提出了一个编辑版的在线对话,解决三个问题:(1)在气候和环境危机的背景下,我们如何定义学术成功?(2)考虑到我们工作的常规,以及在某些情况下不断升级的要求,我们是否觉得我们有能力解决任何衡量成功的适当标准?(3)我们是否觉得我们的同事和现代大学管理程序对成功的衡量标准有适当的重视?我们对从对话中提取的关键点的集体反思可能会在英国(和大学)之外产生共鸣。这些要点包括:调整和调整我们如何为不同的受众描绘学术成功;思考更广泛的学术成功定义;考虑公共参与在学术责任组合中的位置;决定如何应对多重压力;选择如何优先考虑不同的学术需求;并询问应对气候和环境危机的工作是否得到了充分的重视。我们为重新定义学术成功提供了一些实用的建议,这些建议需要学术地理学界的考虑。更广泛的讨论和实施应该有助于提高地理学家个人的工作满意度和职业发展,并加强学术地理学作为一门学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Should academic success be redefined amidst the climate and environmental crisis? A dialogue between five UK geographers

Should academic success be redefined amidst the climate and environmental crisis? A dialogue between five UK geographers

The academic geographical community is well acquainted with the reality of the current climate and environmental crisis. As such, geographers, higher education institutions and geographical organisations arguably should take a greater lead in responding to this crisis. This raises concerns about how such responses fit into academics' ‘core’ job activities, especially given concern about escalating workloads. What mix of activities could or should constitute academic success? This article is based on a dialogue between five UK-based academic geographers spanning different academic career stages. Drawing on our personal and professional experiences, both in the United Kingdom and overseas, we present an edited version of an online dialogue that addresses three questions: (1) How do we define academic success in the context of the climate and environmental crisis? (2) Given the routine and, in some cases, escalating demands of our jobs, do we feel that we have the capacity to address whatever the appropriate measures of success may be? (3) Do we feel that the measures of success are appropriately valued by our colleagues and by modern university management procedures? Our collective reflections on the key points extracted from the dialogue will likely have resonance beyond the United Kingdom (and university) context. These points include: adjusting and adapting how we portray academic success for different audiences; contemplating broader definitions of academic success; considering where public engagement sits within the portfolio of academic responsibilities; deciding how to respond to multiple pressures; choosing how to prioritise different academic demands; and asking whether work to tackle the climate and environmental crisis is adequately valued. We provide some practical suggestions for redefining academic success that require consideration by the academic geographical community. Wider discussion and implementation should contribute to enhancing job satisfaction and career progression for individual geographers and strengthen academic geography as a discipline.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Geo is a fully open access international journal publishing original articles from across the spectrum of geographical and environmental research. Geo welcomes submissions which make a significant contribution to one or more of the journal’s aims. These are to: • encompass the breadth of geographical, environmental and related research, based on original scholarship in the sciences, social sciences and humanities; • bring new understanding to and enhance communication between geographical research agendas, including human-environment interactions, global North-South relations and academic-policy exchange; • advance spatial research and address the importance of geographical enquiry to the understanding of, and action about, contemporary issues; • foster methodological development, including collaborative forms of knowledge production, interdisciplinary approaches and the innovative use of quantitative and/or qualitative data sets; • publish research articles, review papers, data and digital humanities papers, and commentaries which are of international significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信