提高除草效率:解决激光除草机器人的定位误差和切割效率的关键因素

You Wang;Huayan Hu;Shangru Wu;Ya Xiong
{"title":"提高除草效率:解决激光除草机器人的定位误差和切割效率的关键因素","authors":"You Wang;Huayan Hu;Shangru Wu;Ya Xiong","doi":"10.1109/TAFE.2025.3546731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laser weeding technology offers an effective alternative to traditional chemical and mechanical methods, providing precision, low cost, and environmental benefits. However, automatic targeting of weeds using lasers often encounters positional errors, particularly in dynamic weeding modes, which can significantly reduce weed removal efficiency. In addition, the operational efficiency of laser weeding is influenced by multiple factors, and the coupling effects of these factors require further investigation. This article examines the impact of laser power, incident angle, and spot size on the weeding efficiency of four common weed species under static conditions, considering the presence of positioning errors in laser targeting. To address these targeting errors, four weeding patterns were proposed: zigzag, triangular, horizontal, and vertical error compensation trajectories. Among these, the horizontal error compensation trajectory proved to be the most efficient, yielding stable and reliable results. In addition, a laser spot size adjustment device was designed to vary the spot diameter between 1–4 mm. Through four exploratory experiments and one validation experiment, the optimal combination of weeding parameters was identified: the horizontal weeding pattern, maximum laser power, an incidence angle of 80<inline-formula><tex-math>$^{\\circ }$</tex-math></inline-formula>, and a 2 mm spot diameter. This combination achieved optimal compensation with position errors under 2 mm. Validation experiments demonstrated that under these conditions, the average cutting times for chenopodium album, polygonum hydropiper, setaria viridis, and eleusine indica were 0.411 s, 0.308 s, 0.419 s, and 0.384 s, respectively, highlighting the efficiency and stability of this laser weeding model.","PeriodicalId":100637,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on AgriFood Electronics","volume":"3 1","pages":"263-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Weeding Efficiency: Addressing Targeting Positional Errors and Key Determinants of Cutting Efficiency in Laser Weeding Robots\",\"authors\":\"You Wang;Huayan Hu;Shangru Wu;Ya Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAFE.2025.3546731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Laser weeding technology offers an effective alternative to traditional chemical and mechanical methods, providing precision, low cost, and environmental benefits. However, automatic targeting of weeds using lasers often encounters positional errors, particularly in dynamic weeding modes, which can significantly reduce weed removal efficiency. In addition, the operational efficiency of laser weeding is influenced by multiple factors, and the coupling effects of these factors require further investigation. This article examines the impact of laser power, incident angle, and spot size on the weeding efficiency of four common weed species under static conditions, considering the presence of positioning errors in laser targeting. To address these targeting errors, four weeding patterns were proposed: zigzag, triangular, horizontal, and vertical error compensation trajectories. Among these, the horizontal error compensation trajectory proved to be the most efficient, yielding stable and reliable results. In addition, a laser spot size adjustment device was designed to vary the spot diameter between 1–4 mm. Through four exploratory experiments and one validation experiment, the optimal combination of weeding parameters was identified: the horizontal weeding pattern, maximum laser power, an incidence angle of 80<inline-formula><tex-math>$^{\\\\circ }$</tex-math></inline-formula>, and a 2 mm spot diameter. This combination achieved optimal compensation with position errors under 2 mm. Validation experiments demonstrated that under these conditions, the average cutting times for chenopodium album, polygonum hydropiper, setaria viridis, and eleusine indica were 0.411 s, 0.308 s, 0.419 s, and 0.384 s, respectively, highlighting the efficiency and stability of this laser weeding model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on AgriFood Electronics\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"263-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on AgriFood Electronics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10933983/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on AgriFood Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10933983/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激光除草技术是传统化学和机械方法的有效替代,具有精度高、成本低、环保等优点。然而,使用激光自动定位杂草经常会遇到位置误差,特别是在动态除草模式下,这会大大降低杂草的去除效率。此外,激光除草的作业效率受多种因素的影响,这些因素之间的耦合效应有待进一步研究。本文研究了静态条件下激光功率、入射角和光斑大小对四种常见杂草除草效率的影响,并考虑了激光瞄准中定位误差的存在。为了解决这些定位误差,提出了四种除草模式:之字形、三角形、水平和垂直误差补偿轨迹。其中,横向误差补偿轨迹的补偿效率最高,补偿结果稳定可靠。此外,设计了激光光斑尺寸调节装置,使光斑直径在1 ~ 4 mm之间变化。通过4个探索性实验和1个验证性实验,确定了最优的除草参数组合:水平除草模式、最大激光功率、入射角80$^{\circ}$、光斑直径2 mm。该组合实现了位置误差小于2 mm的最佳补偿。验证实验结果表明,在此条件下,藜、蓼、狗尾草和羊尾草的平均切割时间分别为0.411 s、0.308 s、0.419 s和0.384 s,显示了该激光除草模型的有效性和稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Weeding Efficiency: Addressing Targeting Positional Errors and Key Determinants of Cutting Efficiency in Laser Weeding Robots
Laser weeding technology offers an effective alternative to traditional chemical and mechanical methods, providing precision, low cost, and environmental benefits. However, automatic targeting of weeds using lasers often encounters positional errors, particularly in dynamic weeding modes, which can significantly reduce weed removal efficiency. In addition, the operational efficiency of laser weeding is influenced by multiple factors, and the coupling effects of these factors require further investigation. This article examines the impact of laser power, incident angle, and spot size on the weeding efficiency of four common weed species under static conditions, considering the presence of positioning errors in laser targeting. To address these targeting errors, four weeding patterns were proposed: zigzag, triangular, horizontal, and vertical error compensation trajectories. Among these, the horizontal error compensation trajectory proved to be the most efficient, yielding stable and reliable results. In addition, a laser spot size adjustment device was designed to vary the spot diameter between 1–4 mm. Through four exploratory experiments and one validation experiment, the optimal combination of weeding parameters was identified: the horizontal weeding pattern, maximum laser power, an incidence angle of 80$^{\circ }$, and a 2 mm spot diameter. This combination achieved optimal compensation with position errors under 2 mm. Validation experiments demonstrated that under these conditions, the average cutting times for chenopodium album, polygonum hydropiper, setaria viridis, and eleusine indica were 0.411 s, 0.308 s, 0.419 s, and 0.384 s, respectively, highlighting the efficiency and stability of this laser weeding model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信