深入分析 CT 分辨率对激光粉末床熔融增材制造中孔隙率评估的影响

Jitendra Singh Rathore , Andrew King , Florian Le Bourdais , Jean-Paul Garandet
{"title":"深入分析 CT 分辨率对激光粉末床熔融增材制造中孔隙率评估的影响","authors":"Jitendra Singh Rathore ,&nbsp;Andrew King ,&nbsp;Florian Le Bourdais ,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Garandet","doi":"10.1016/j.tmater.2025.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate porosity determination of Additive Manufacturing (AM) parts remains a key challenge. This study provides an in-depth analysis of how computed tomography (CT) resolution affects porosity detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) manufactured parts by comparing X-ray based measurements from laboratory and synchrotron sources. To represent a range of porosity levels, three samples were selected from an extensive set of LPBF experiments, of respectively low, medium, and high porosities. A laboratory source based computed tomography system was used for the acquisition at the best resolution considering the size limitation due to the sample geometry. In order to achieve higher resolution, a synchrotron source was additionally utilized. The comparative analysis revealed that the porosity measurements from both the laboratory and synchrotron sources were in good agreement for samples with low and high porosity levels. This indicates that for extreme ends of the studied porosity spectrum, laboratory CT systems can provide reliable measurements. However, for the sample with medium porosity, the limited resolution of the laboratory CT leads to an overestimation compared to the synchrotron CT results. This discrepancy is found to be due to inaccuracies in detecting and clustering neighboring pores, leading to an overestimation of porosity. A comparison of the obtained results with the porosity determinations by the widely used Archimedes method is proposed to show the potential and the limitations of each technique for the assessment of additively manufactured parts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101254,"journal":{"name":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-depth analysis of CT resolution impact on porosity evaluation in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing\",\"authors\":\"Jitendra Singh Rathore ,&nbsp;Andrew King ,&nbsp;Florian Le Bourdais ,&nbsp;Jean-Paul Garandet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmater.2025.100065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate porosity determination of Additive Manufacturing (AM) parts remains a key challenge. This study provides an in-depth analysis of how computed tomography (CT) resolution affects porosity detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) manufactured parts by comparing X-ray based measurements from laboratory and synchrotron sources. To represent a range of porosity levels, three samples were selected from an extensive set of LPBF experiments, of respectively low, medium, and high porosities. A laboratory source based computed tomography system was used for the acquisition at the best resolution considering the size limitation due to the sample geometry. In order to achieve higher resolution, a synchrotron source was additionally utilized. The comparative analysis revealed that the porosity measurements from both the laboratory and synchrotron sources were in good agreement for samples with low and high porosity levels. This indicates that for extreme ends of the studied porosity spectrum, laboratory CT systems can provide reliable measurements. However, for the sample with medium porosity, the limited resolution of the laboratory CT leads to an overestimation compared to the synchrotron CT results. This discrepancy is found to be due to inaccuracies in detecting and clustering neighboring pores, leading to an overestimation of porosity. A comparison of the obtained results with the porosity determinations by the widely used Archimedes method is proposed to show the potential and the limitations of each technique for the assessment of additively manufactured parts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tomography of Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tomography of Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X2500018X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X2500018X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精确测定增材制造(AM)部件的孔隙率仍然是一项关键挑战。本研究通过比较实验室和同步辐射源的 X 射线测量结果,深入分析了计算机断层扫描(CT)分辨率如何影响激光粉末床熔融(LPBF)制造部件的孔隙率检测。为了代表一定范围的孔隙率水平,我们从大量 LPBF 实验中选取了三个样品,分别为低孔隙率、中孔隙率和高孔隙率。考虑到样品几何形状造成的尺寸限制,我们使用了基于实验室光源的计算机断层扫描系统以最佳分辨率进行采集。为了获得更高的分辨率,还额外使用了同步辐射源。对比分析表明,实验室和同步辐射源对低孔隙度和高孔隙度样品的孔隙度测量结果非常一致。这表明,对于所研究孔隙率频谱的两端,实验室 CT 系统可以提供可靠的测量结果。然而,对于中等孔隙率的样品,由于实验室 CT 的分辨率有限,与同步辐射 CT 的结果相比,高估了样品的孔隙率。研究发现,这种差异是由于在检测和聚类相邻孔隙时存在误差,导致高估了孔隙率。建议将获得的结果与广泛使用的阿基米德方法确定的孔隙率进行比较,以显示每种技术在评估添加制造部件方面的潜力和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-depth analysis of CT resolution impact on porosity evaluation in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
Accurate porosity determination of Additive Manufacturing (AM) parts remains a key challenge. This study provides an in-depth analysis of how computed tomography (CT) resolution affects porosity detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) manufactured parts by comparing X-ray based measurements from laboratory and synchrotron sources. To represent a range of porosity levels, three samples were selected from an extensive set of LPBF experiments, of respectively low, medium, and high porosities. A laboratory source based computed tomography system was used for the acquisition at the best resolution considering the size limitation due to the sample geometry. In order to achieve higher resolution, a synchrotron source was additionally utilized. The comparative analysis revealed that the porosity measurements from both the laboratory and synchrotron sources were in good agreement for samples with low and high porosity levels. This indicates that for extreme ends of the studied porosity spectrum, laboratory CT systems can provide reliable measurements. However, for the sample with medium porosity, the limited resolution of the laboratory CT leads to an overestimation compared to the synchrotron CT results. This discrepancy is found to be due to inaccuracies in detecting and clustering neighboring pores, leading to an overestimation of porosity. A comparison of the obtained results with the porosity determinations by the widely used Archimedes method is proposed to show the potential and the limitations of each technique for the assessment of additively manufactured parts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信