{"title":"Investigating the dynamic relationship of lexical and syntactic complexity in L2 writing across proficiency levels: A CDST-inspired study","authors":"Jinlu Liu , Ming Wu , Haitao Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the development of lexical and syntactic complexity in L2 writing across five proficiency levels (ST2-ST6) of Chinese EFL learners. Analyzing 3423 essays from the Chinese Learner English Corpus (2003), we employed the Moving-Average Type-Token Ratio and Mean Dependency Distance to measure lexical and syntactic complexity, respectively. Results revealed significant, though non-linear, increase in both measures across proficiency levels. Syntactic complexity showed consistent growth, while lexical complexity plateaued at intermediate levels. A dynamic relationship analysis indicated periods of compensatory growth between lexical and syntactic complexity, particularly at lower proficiency levels. A combined complexity measure demonstrated an overall linear trend with significant non-linear components. These findings, interpreted through the lens of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory, suggest that L2 writing development involves intricate, sometimes competitive interactions between different levels of language proficiency. The study's outcomes have implications for language pedagogy, particularly in informing stage-appropriate instructional strategies and multi-dimensional assessment practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 103678"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25000880","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the dynamic relationship of lexical and syntactic complexity in L2 writing across proficiency levels: A CDST-inspired study
This study examines the development of lexical and syntactic complexity in L2 writing across five proficiency levels (ST2-ST6) of Chinese EFL learners. Analyzing 3423 essays from the Chinese Learner English Corpus (2003), we employed the Moving-Average Type-Token Ratio and Mean Dependency Distance to measure lexical and syntactic complexity, respectively. Results revealed significant, though non-linear, increase in both measures across proficiency levels. Syntactic complexity showed consistent growth, while lexical complexity plateaued at intermediate levels. A dynamic relationship analysis indicated periods of compensatory growth between lexical and syntactic complexity, particularly at lower proficiency levels. A combined complexity measure demonstrated an overall linear trend with significant non-linear components. These findings, interpreted through the lens of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory, suggest that L2 writing development involves intricate, sometimes competitive interactions between different levels of language proficiency. The study's outcomes have implications for language pedagogy, particularly in informing stage-appropriate instructional strategies and multi-dimensional assessment practices.
期刊介绍:
This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.