一项开放标签随机主动对照II期临床研究,评估afuresertib +紫杉醇与紫杉醇在铂耐药卵巢癌患者中的疗效和安全性(PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044)

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Thomas J. Herzog , John B. Liao , Karen Finkelstein , Lyndsay Willmott , Wei Duan , John W. Moroney , Joseph Buscema , Katie Campbell-Simms , Yong Yue , Susan Zweizig , Juan Liu , Xiaoyu Wang , Rong-Yu Zang , Rutie Yin , David M. O'Malley , Lingying Wu
{"title":"一项开放标签随机主动对照II期临床研究,评估afuresertib +紫杉醇与紫杉醇在铂耐药卵巢癌患者中的疗效和安全性(PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044)","authors":"Thomas J. Herzog ,&nbsp;John B. Liao ,&nbsp;Karen Finkelstein ,&nbsp;Lyndsay Willmott ,&nbsp;Wei Duan ,&nbsp;John W. Moroney ,&nbsp;Joseph Buscema ,&nbsp;Katie Campbell-Simms ,&nbsp;Yong Yue ,&nbsp;Susan Zweizig ,&nbsp;Juan Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Wang ,&nbsp;Rong-Yu Zang ,&nbsp;Rutie Yin ,&nbsp;David M. O'Malley ,&nbsp;Lingying Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of paclitaxel with and without the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This phase II open-label randomized trial (<span><span>NCT04374630</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) enrolled 150 PROC patients to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Eligible patients received 1–5 prior chemotherapies (≤1 post-PROC therapy). Biomarker analysis assessed PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations, BRCA1/2-mutations, and phospho-AKT levels. Patients with prior AKT or mTOR inhibitor use were excluded. Randomization was stratified by country and prior use of bevacizumab and platinum-based treatment lines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the intent-to-treat population, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS between afuresertib+paclitaxel (A + P) vs. paclitaxel (Pac) alone (median PFS 4.3mos [95 % CI, 3.58–5.62] vs 4.1mos [95 % CI 2.63–5.36]. PFS HR: 0.7 (95 % CI, 0.50–1.10; <em>P</em> = 0.139). No statistically significant difference in median OS was observed either (11.2mos with A + P, 95 % CI, 8.38–13.77) vs. 13.1mos in Pac arm (95 % CI, 7.75–18) and HR = 1.2 (95 % CI, 0.77–1.81). In AKT mutation biomarker+ (IHC &gt; 1) patients, the median PFS of A + P vs. Pac was 5.4mos vs. 2.9mos (HR = 0.4; 95 % CI, 0.12–1.00). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with AKT inhibitors, with serious TEAEs in 34.3 % (A + P) vs. 25.5 % (Pac), including diarrhea and gastrointestinal perforations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of afuresertib to paclitaxel did not significantly improve PFS/OS in patients with PROC. However, exploratory biomarker findings suggest potential efficacy in phospho-AKT positive patients, warranting further investigation. The safety/tolerability profile of A + P was consistent with prior AKT-inhibitor studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 145-152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An open-label randomized active-controlled phase II clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of afuresertib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044)\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Herzog ,&nbsp;John B. Liao ,&nbsp;Karen Finkelstein ,&nbsp;Lyndsay Willmott ,&nbsp;Wei Duan ,&nbsp;John W. Moroney ,&nbsp;Joseph Buscema ,&nbsp;Katie Campbell-Simms ,&nbsp;Yong Yue ,&nbsp;Susan Zweizig ,&nbsp;Juan Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Wang ,&nbsp;Rong-Yu Zang ,&nbsp;Rutie Yin ,&nbsp;David M. O'Malley ,&nbsp;Lingying Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of paclitaxel with and without the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This phase II open-label randomized trial (<span><span>NCT04374630</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) enrolled 150 PROC patients to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Eligible patients received 1–5 prior chemotherapies (≤1 post-PROC therapy). Biomarker analysis assessed PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations, BRCA1/2-mutations, and phospho-AKT levels. Patients with prior AKT or mTOR inhibitor use were excluded. Randomization was stratified by country and prior use of bevacizumab and platinum-based treatment lines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the intent-to-treat population, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS between afuresertib+paclitaxel (A + P) vs. paclitaxel (Pac) alone (median PFS 4.3mos [95 % CI, 3.58–5.62] vs 4.1mos [95 % CI 2.63–5.36]. PFS HR: 0.7 (95 % CI, 0.50–1.10; <em>P</em> = 0.139). No statistically significant difference in median OS was observed either (11.2mos with A + P, 95 % CI, 8.38–13.77) vs. 13.1mos in Pac arm (95 % CI, 7.75–18) and HR = 1.2 (95 % CI, 0.77–1.81). In AKT mutation biomarker+ (IHC &gt; 1) patients, the median PFS of A + P vs. Pac was 5.4mos vs. 2.9mos (HR = 0.4; 95 % CI, 0.12–1.00). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with AKT inhibitors, with serious TEAEs in 34.3 % (A + P) vs. 25.5 % (Pac), including diarrhea and gastrointestinal perforations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of afuresertib to paclitaxel did not significantly improve PFS/OS in patients with PROC. However, exploratory biomarker findings suggest potential efficacy in phospho-AKT positive patients, warranting further investigation. The safety/tolerability profile of A + P was consistent with prior AKT-inhibitor studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825000708\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825000708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价紫杉醇联合或不联合AKT抑制剂afuresertib治疗铂耐药卵巢癌(PROC)的疗效和安全性/耐受性。该II期开放标签随机试验(NCT04374630)纳入150例PROC患者,以评估无进展生存期(PFS)为主要终点,次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率和缓解持续时间。符合条件的患者接受了1 - 5次化疗(≤1次proc治疗后)。生物标志物分析评估PI3K/AKT/PTEN改变、brca1 /2突变和磷酸化AKT水平。排除既往使用AKT或mTOR抑制剂的患者。随机化按国家和既往使用贝伐单抗和铂基治疗线进行分层。结果在意向治疗人群中,afuresertib+紫杉醇(A + P)与单独紫杉醇(Pac)的PFS无统计学差异(中位PFS为4.3mos [95% CI, 3.58-5.62] vs 4.1mos [95% CI, 2.63-5.36])。PFS hr: 0.7 (95% ci, 0.50-1.10;p = 0.139)。中位OS (A + P组11.2个月,95% CI, 8.38-13.77)与Pac组13.1个月(95% CI, 7.75-18)、HR = 1.2 (95% CI, 0.77-1.81)差异无统计学意义。AKT突变生物标志物+ (IHC >;1)患者,A + P和Pac的中位PFS分别为5.4个月和2.9个月(HR = 0.4;95% ci, 0.12-1.00)。治疗出现的不良事件(teae)与AKT抑制剂一致,34.3% (A + P)对25.5% (Pac)的严重teae,包括腹泻和胃肠道穿孔。结论在紫杉醇中加入afuresertib并没有显著改善PROC患者的PFS/OS,但探索性生物标志物研究结果表明,在phospho-AKT阳性患者中可能有效,值得进一步研究。A + P的安全性/耐受性与之前的akt抑制剂研究一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An open-label randomized active-controlled phase II clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of afuresertib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044)

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of paclitaxel with and without the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).

Methods

This phase II open-label randomized trial (NCT04374630) enrolled 150 PROC patients to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Eligible patients received 1–5 prior chemotherapies (≤1 post-PROC therapy). Biomarker analysis assessed PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations, BRCA1/2-mutations, and phospho-AKT levels. Patients with prior AKT or mTOR inhibitor use were excluded. Randomization was stratified by country and prior use of bevacizumab and platinum-based treatment lines.

Results

In the intent-to-treat population, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS between afuresertib+paclitaxel (A + P) vs. paclitaxel (Pac) alone (median PFS 4.3mos [95 % CI, 3.58–5.62] vs 4.1mos [95 % CI 2.63–5.36]. PFS HR: 0.7 (95 % CI, 0.50–1.10; P = 0.139). No statistically significant difference in median OS was observed either (11.2mos with A + P, 95 % CI, 8.38–13.77) vs. 13.1mos in Pac arm (95 % CI, 7.75–18) and HR = 1.2 (95 % CI, 0.77–1.81). In AKT mutation biomarker+ (IHC > 1) patients, the median PFS of A + P vs. Pac was 5.4mos vs. 2.9mos (HR = 0.4; 95 % CI, 0.12–1.00). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with AKT inhibitors, with serious TEAEs in 34.3 % (A + P) vs. 25.5 % (Pac), including diarrhea and gastrointestinal perforations.

Conclusions

The addition of afuresertib to paclitaxel did not significantly improve PFS/OS in patients with PROC. However, exploratory biomarker findings suggest potential efficacy in phospho-AKT positive patients, warranting further investigation. The safety/tolerability profile of A + P was consistent with prior AKT-inhibitor studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic oncology
Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信