Thomas J. Herzog , John B. Liao , Karen Finkelstein , Lyndsay Willmott , Wei Duan , John W. Moroney , Joseph Buscema , Katie Campbell-Simms , Yong Yue , Susan Zweizig , Juan Liu , Xiaoyu Wang , Rong-Yu Zang , Rutie Yin , David M. O'Malley , Lingying Wu
{"title":"一项开放标签随机主动对照II期临床研究,评估afuresertib +紫杉醇与紫杉醇在铂耐药卵巢癌患者中的疗效和安全性(PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044)","authors":"Thomas J. Herzog , John B. Liao , Karen Finkelstein , Lyndsay Willmott , Wei Duan , John W. Moroney , Joseph Buscema , Katie Campbell-Simms , Yong Yue , Susan Zweizig , Juan Liu , Xiaoyu Wang , Rong-Yu Zang , Rutie Yin , David M. O'Malley , Lingying Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of paclitaxel with and without the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This phase II open-label randomized trial (<span><span>NCT04374630</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) enrolled 150 PROC patients to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Eligible patients received 1–5 prior chemotherapies (≤1 post-PROC therapy). Biomarker analysis assessed PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations, BRCA1/2-mutations, and phospho-AKT levels. Patients with prior AKT or mTOR inhibitor use were excluded. Randomization was stratified by country and prior use of bevacizumab and platinum-based treatment lines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the intent-to-treat population, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS between afuresertib+paclitaxel (A + P) vs. paclitaxel (Pac) alone (median PFS 4.3mos [95 % CI, 3.58–5.62] vs 4.1mos [95 % CI 2.63–5.36]. PFS HR: 0.7 (95 % CI, 0.50–1.10; <em>P</em> = 0.139). No statistically significant difference in median OS was observed either (11.2mos with A + P, 95 % CI, 8.38–13.77) vs. 13.1mos in Pac arm (95 % CI, 7.75–18) and HR = 1.2 (95 % CI, 0.77–1.81). In AKT mutation biomarker+ (IHC > 1) patients, the median PFS of A + P vs. Pac was 5.4mos vs. 2.9mos (HR = 0.4; 95 % CI, 0.12–1.00). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with AKT inhibitors, with serious TEAEs in 34.3 % (A + P) vs. 25.5 % (Pac), including diarrhea and gastrointestinal perforations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of afuresertib to paclitaxel did not significantly improve PFS/OS in patients with PROC. However, exploratory biomarker findings suggest potential efficacy in phospho-AKT positive patients, warranting further investigation. The safety/tolerability profile of A + P was consistent with prior AKT-inhibitor studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 145-152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An open-label randomized active-controlled phase II clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of afuresertib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044)\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Herzog , John B. Liao , Karen Finkelstein , Lyndsay Willmott , Wei Duan , John W. Moroney , Joseph Buscema , Katie Campbell-Simms , Yong Yue , Susan Zweizig , Juan Liu , Xiaoyu Wang , Rong-Yu Zang , Rutie Yin , David M. O'Malley , Lingying Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of paclitaxel with and without the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This phase II open-label randomized trial (<span><span>NCT04374630</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) enrolled 150 PROC patients to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Eligible patients received 1–5 prior chemotherapies (≤1 post-PROC therapy). Biomarker analysis assessed PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations, BRCA1/2-mutations, and phospho-AKT levels. Patients with prior AKT or mTOR inhibitor use were excluded. Randomization was stratified by country and prior use of bevacizumab and platinum-based treatment lines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the intent-to-treat population, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS between afuresertib+paclitaxel (A + P) vs. paclitaxel (Pac) alone (median PFS 4.3mos [95 % CI, 3.58–5.62] vs 4.1mos [95 % CI 2.63–5.36]. PFS HR: 0.7 (95 % CI, 0.50–1.10; <em>P</em> = 0.139). No statistically significant difference in median OS was observed either (11.2mos with A + P, 95 % CI, 8.38–13.77) vs. 13.1mos in Pac arm (95 % CI, 7.75–18) and HR = 1.2 (95 % CI, 0.77–1.81). In AKT mutation biomarker+ (IHC > 1) patients, the median PFS of A + P vs. Pac was 5.4mos vs. 2.9mos (HR = 0.4; 95 % CI, 0.12–1.00). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with AKT inhibitors, with serious TEAEs in 34.3 % (A + P) vs. 25.5 % (Pac), including diarrhea and gastrointestinal perforations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of afuresertib to paclitaxel did not significantly improve PFS/OS in patients with PROC. However, exploratory biomarker findings suggest potential efficacy in phospho-AKT positive patients, warranting further investigation. The safety/tolerability profile of A + P was consistent with prior AKT-inhibitor studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825000708\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825000708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An open-label randomized active-controlled phase II clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of afuresertib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROFECTA-II/GOG-3044)
Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety/tolerability of paclitaxel with and without the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).
Methods
This phase II open-label randomized trial (NCT04374630) enrolled 150 PROC patients to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Eligible patients received 1–5 prior chemotherapies (≤1 post-PROC therapy). Biomarker analysis assessed PI3K/AKT/PTEN alterations, BRCA1/2-mutations, and phospho-AKT levels. Patients with prior AKT or mTOR inhibitor use were excluded. Randomization was stratified by country and prior use of bevacizumab and platinum-based treatment lines.
Results
In the intent-to-treat population, no statistically significant difference was observed in PFS between afuresertib+paclitaxel (A + P) vs. paclitaxel (Pac) alone (median PFS 4.3mos [95 % CI, 3.58–5.62] vs 4.1mos [95 % CI 2.63–5.36]. PFS HR: 0.7 (95 % CI, 0.50–1.10; P = 0.139). No statistically significant difference in median OS was observed either (11.2mos with A + P, 95 % CI, 8.38–13.77) vs. 13.1mos in Pac arm (95 % CI, 7.75–18) and HR = 1.2 (95 % CI, 0.77–1.81). In AKT mutation biomarker+ (IHC > 1) patients, the median PFS of A + P vs. Pac was 5.4mos vs. 2.9mos (HR = 0.4; 95 % CI, 0.12–1.00). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with AKT inhibitors, with serious TEAEs in 34.3 % (A + P) vs. 25.5 % (Pac), including diarrhea and gastrointestinal perforations.
Conclusions
The addition of afuresertib to paclitaxel did not significantly improve PFS/OS in patients with PROC. However, exploratory biomarker findings suggest potential efficacy in phospho-AKT positive patients, warranting further investigation. The safety/tolerability profile of A + P was consistent with prior AKT-inhibitor studies.
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published.
Research Areas Include:
• Cell and molecular biology
• Chemotherapy
• Cytology
• Endocrinology
• Epidemiology
• Genetics
• Gynecologic surgery
• Immunology
• Pathology
• Radiotherapy