跨语言洞察：比较抖音上的西班牙语和英语宫颈癌内容

IF 4.5 2区医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Gynecologic oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.02.004

Jessica Velasquez, Maryam Mohammed-Norgan, Alexandra Scheiber, Julia Chalif, Anna Gonzalez, Danielle Glassman, Molly Morton, David M. O'Malley, Laura M. Chambers

{"title":"跨语言洞察：比较抖音上的西班牙语和英语宫颈癌内容","authors":"Jessica Velasquez, Maryam Mohammed-Norgan, Alexandra Scheiber, Julia Chalif, Anna Gonzalez, Danielle Glassman, Molly Morton, David M. O'Malley, Laura M. Chambers","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate themes, quality, and reliability of cervical cancer (CC) related Spanish-language content on TikTok as compared to English-language content.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>TikTok was systematically searched for the top 200 Spanish-language and 100 English-language posts for CC in August 2024. Data were collected including creator demographics, timing of posts in relation to diagnosis, tone, intent, and themes. The modified DISCERN, a validated tool including structured questions assessing reliability and of health-related resources was utilized to assess videos with educational intent. Differences were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were more physician Spanish-language creators (27.8 %) compared to physician English-language creators (11.00 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Most Spanish-language education videos were created by physicians (82.25 %). Spanish-language posts were more likely to feature themes of treatment toxicities (7.5 % vs 1.7 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001), faith (3.7 % vs 0.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.003), pain (2.0 % vs 0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.001), family support (1.6 % vs 0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.004), hair loss (1.8 % vs 0.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.039), and long-term treatment sequelae (1.4 % vs 0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.007); and less likely to address themes of diagnosis (11.8 % vs 18.0 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001), fear or anxiety about cancer (3.4 % vs 8.2 %, <em>p</em> = 0.002), impact on sexual function (0.6 % vs 6.1 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and parenthood (0 % vs 3.7 %, p < 0.001). The median DISCERN score was 1.42 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 1.33–1.67) and 1.33 (IQR 1.00–1.92), for Spanish and English-language posts, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.385).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There were significantly more Spanish-language physician creators suggesting a strong interest in physician-driven content. Thematic differences between Spanish-language and English-language posts highlight important differences in experiences. CC-related content is of poor educational quality, regardless of language. Improving TikTok educational content could increase CC awareness and prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-language insights: Comparing Spanish and English-language cervical cancer content on TikTok\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Velasquez, Maryam Mohammed-Norgan, Alexandra Scheiber, Julia Chalif, Anna Gonzalez, Danielle Glassman, Molly Morton, David M. O'Malley, Laura M. Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate themes, quality, and reliability of cervical cancer (CC) related Spanish-language content on TikTok as compared to English-language content.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>TikTok was systematically searched for the top 200 Spanish-language and 100 English-language posts for CC in August 2024. Data were collected including creator demographics, timing of posts in relation to diagnosis, tone, intent, and themes. The modified DISCERN, a validated tool including structured questions assessing reliability and of health-related resources was utilized to assess videos with educational intent. Differences were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were more physician Spanish-language creators (27.8 %) compared to physician English-language creators (11.00 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Most Spanish-language education videos were created by physicians (82.25 %). Spanish-language posts were more likely to feature themes of treatment toxicities (7.5 % vs 1.7 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001), faith (3.7 % vs 0.7 %, <em>p</em> = 0.003), pain (2.0 % vs 0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.001), family support (1.6 % vs 0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.004), hair loss (1.8 % vs 0.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.039), and long-term treatment sequelae (1.4 % vs 0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.007); and less likely to address themes of diagnosis (11.8 % vs 18.0 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001), fear or anxiety about cancer (3.4 % vs 8.2 %, <em>p</em> = 0.002), impact on sexual function (0.6 % vs 6.1 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and parenthood (0 % vs 3.7 %, p < 0.001). The median DISCERN score was 1.42 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 1.33–1.67) and 1.33 (IQR 1.00–1.92), for Spanish and English-language posts, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.385).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There were significantly more Spanish-language physician creators suggesting a strong interest in physician-driven content. Thematic differences between Spanish-language and English-language posts highlight important differences in experiences. CC-related content is of poor educational quality, regardless of language. Improving TikTok educational content could increase CC awareness and prevention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 131-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825000319\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825000319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的与英语内容相比，研究TikTok上与宫颈癌（CC）相关的西班牙语内容的主题、质量和可靠性。方法系统检索2024年8月前200名西班牙语和100名英语CC帖子。收集的数据包括创作者人口统计数据、与诊断、语气、意图和主题相关的帖子发布时间。改进的DISCERN是一种经过验证的工具，包括评估可靠性和健康相关资源的结构化问题，用于评估具有教育目的的视频。评估差异。结果西班牙语创作者（27.8%）多于英语创作者（11.00%），p <；0.001)。大多数西班牙语教育视频是由医生制作的（82.25%）。西班牙语帖子更有可能以治疗毒性为主题(7.5% vs 1.7%, p <；0.001),信仰(3.7%比0.7%,p = 0.003),疼痛(2.0%比0%,p = 0.001),家庭支持(1.6%比0%,p = 0.004),脱发(1.8%比0.3%,p = 0.039),和长期治疗后遗症(1.4%比0%,p = 0.007);不太可能解决诊断主题(11.8% vs 18.0%, p <；0.001)，对癌症的恐惧或焦虑（3.4% vs 8.2%, p = 0.002），对性功能的影响(0.6% vs 6.1%, p <；0.001)和为人父母(0% vs 3.7%, p <；0.001)。西班牙语和英语职位的DISCERN得分中位数分别为1.42（四分位间距[IQR] 1.33 - 1.67）和1.33 (IQR 1.00-1.92) （p = 0.385）。结论：西班牙语医生创作者明显增多，表明人们对医生驱动的内容有浓厚的兴趣。西班牙语和英语帖子的主题差异突出了体验上的重要差异。无论何种语言，cc相关内容的教育质量都很差。改善TikTok的教育内容可以提高对CC的认识和预防。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Cross-language insights: Comparing Spanish and English-language cervical cancer content on TikTok

Objectives

To investigate themes, quality, and reliability of cervical cancer (CC) related Spanish-language content on TikTok as compared to English-language content.

Methods

TikTok was systematically searched for the top 200 Spanish-language and 100 English-language posts for CC in August 2024. Data were collected including creator demographics, timing of posts in relation to diagnosis, tone, intent, and themes. The modified DISCERN, a validated tool including structured questions assessing reliability and of health-related resources was utilized to assess videos with educational intent. Differences were assessed.

Results

There were more physician Spanish-language creators (27.8 %) compared to physician English-language creators (11.00 %, p < 0.001). Most Spanish-language education videos were created by physicians (82.25 %). Spanish-language posts were more likely to feature themes of treatment toxicities (7.5 % vs 1.7 %, p < 0.001), faith (3.7 % vs 0.7 %, p = 0.003), pain (2.0 % vs 0 %, p = 0.001), family support (1.6 % vs 0 %, p = 0.004), hair loss (1.8 % vs 0.3 %, p = 0.039), and long-term treatment sequelae (1.4 % vs 0 %, p = 0.007); and less likely to address themes of diagnosis (11.8 % vs 18.0 %, p < 0.001), fear or anxiety about cancer (3.4 % vs 8.2 %, p = 0.002), impact on sexual function (0.6 % vs 6.1 %, p < 0.001) and parenthood (0 % vs 3.7 %, p < 0.001). The median DISCERN score was 1.42 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 1.33–1.67) and 1.33 (IQR 1.00–1.92), for Spanish and English-language posts, respectively (p = 0.385).

Conclusions

There were significantly more Spanish-language physician creators suggesting a strong interest in physician-driven content. Thematic differences between Spanish-language and English-language posts highlight important differences in experiences. CC-related content is of poor educational quality, regardless of language. Improving TikTok educational content could increase CC awareness and prevention.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

6.40%

发文量

1062

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy