高等教育中的EMI改革:EMI教授作为政策、质量和专业化的政治规范框架

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mustafa Akıncıoğlu
{"title":"高等教育中的EMI改革:EMI教授作为政策、质量和专业化的政治规范框架","authors":"Mustafa Akıncıoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>English-medium instruction (EMI) has often been implemented through ill-thought-out institutional/national strategic decisions, typically driven by the internationalisation of higher education. In this context, EMI research seems to be condensed on problem identification and trends, focusing on English language issues, pedagogical challenges, and stakeholder perceptions. This narrow focus appears to have reached a saturation point, underscoring the need for a reform-driven approach—one that prioritises structural transformation and problem-solving. Addressing this gap, this political normative paper argues that the professionalisation of EMI at the tertiary level represents the way forward. Situated within the broader contexts of global capitalism and neoliberalism, this paper takes a Critical EMI stance to examine the role of EMI in higher education. It proposes a structured, solution-oriented approach, grounded in three interrelated critical concepts: multilingualism, universities as sites for liberation, and English as an international language. EMI policy and quality are structured around three cyclic stages, with academic learning outcomes at the core. Rather than offering a rigid framework, this paper introduces the EMI Professionalisation Framework (EMI ProF) as a guiding political normative model informed by prior research to drive the EMI reform and support the professionalisation agenda. Key definitions of EMI quality, professionalisation of EMI, EMI professionals, and EMI content-teacher competence are provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming EMI in higher education: The EMI ProF as a political normative framework for policy, quality, and professionalisation\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Akıncıoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>English-medium instruction (EMI) has often been implemented through ill-thought-out institutional/national strategic decisions, typically driven by the internationalisation of higher education. In this context, EMI research seems to be condensed on problem identification and trends, focusing on English language issues, pedagogical challenges, and stakeholder perceptions. This narrow focus appears to have reached a saturation point, underscoring the need for a reform-driven approach—one that prioritises structural transformation and problem-solving. Addressing this gap, this political normative paper argues that the professionalisation of EMI at the tertiary level represents the way forward. Situated within the broader contexts of global capitalism and neoliberalism, this paper takes a Critical EMI stance to examine the role of EMI in higher education. It proposes a structured, solution-oriented approach, grounded in three interrelated critical concepts: multilingualism, universities as sites for liberation, and English as an international language. EMI policy and quality are structured around three cyclic stages, with academic learning outcomes at the core. Rather than offering a rigid framework, this paper introduces the EMI Professionalisation Framework (EMI ProF) as a guiding political normative model informed by prior research to drive the EMI reform and support the professionalisation agenda. Key definitions of EMI quality, professionalisation of EMI, EMI professionals, and EMI content-teacher competence are provided.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325000744\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059325000744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英语教学(EMI)通常是通过考虑不周的机构/国家战略决策来实施的,通常是由高等教育的国际化驱动的。在这种背景下,EMI研究似乎集中在问题识别和趋势上,重点是英语语言问题、教学挑战和利益相关者的看法。这种狭隘的关注似乎已经达到了饱和点,强调了改革驱动方法的必要性,即优先考虑结构转型和解决问题。为了解决这一差距,这篇政治规范性论文认为,高等教育水平的EMI专业化代表了前进的方向。在全球资本主义和新自由主义的更广泛背景下,本文采取批判的EMI立场来研究EMI在高等教育中的作用。它提出了一个结构化的,以解决方案为导向的方法,基于三个相互关联的关键概念:多语言,大学作为解放的场所,英语作为国际语言。EMI政策和质量围绕三个循环阶段构建,以学术学习成果为核心。本文没有提供一个严格的框架,而是介绍了EMI专业化框架(EMI ProF),作为一种指导政治规范模型,该模型是通过先前的研究来推动EMI改革并支持专业化议程的。提供了EMI质量、EMI专业化、EMI专业人员和EMI内容教师能力的关键定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reforming EMI in higher education: The EMI ProF as a political normative framework for policy, quality, and professionalisation
English-medium instruction (EMI) has often been implemented through ill-thought-out institutional/national strategic decisions, typically driven by the internationalisation of higher education. In this context, EMI research seems to be condensed on problem identification and trends, focusing on English language issues, pedagogical challenges, and stakeholder perceptions. This narrow focus appears to have reached a saturation point, underscoring the need for a reform-driven approach—one that prioritises structural transformation and problem-solving. Addressing this gap, this political normative paper argues that the professionalisation of EMI at the tertiary level represents the way forward. Situated within the broader contexts of global capitalism and neoliberalism, this paper takes a Critical EMI stance to examine the role of EMI in higher education. It proposes a structured, solution-oriented approach, grounded in three interrelated critical concepts: multilingualism, universities as sites for liberation, and English as an international language. EMI policy and quality are structured around three cyclic stages, with academic learning outcomes at the core. Rather than offering a rigid framework, this paper introduces the EMI Professionalisation Framework (EMI ProF) as a guiding political normative model informed by prior research to drive the EMI reform and support the professionalisation agenda. Key definitions of EMI quality, professionalisation of EMI, EMI professionals, and EMI content-teacher competence are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Development
International Journal of Educational Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Educational Development is to foster critical debate about the role that education plays in development. IJED seeks both to develop new theoretical insights into the education-development relationship and new understandings of the extent and nature of educational change in diverse settings. It stresses the importance of understanding the interplay of local, national, regional and global contexts and dynamics in shaping education and development. Orthodox notions of development as being about growth, industrialisation or poverty reduction are increasingly questioned. There are competing accounts that stress the human dimensions of development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信