V. J. S. Costa , A. Maurin Souvignet , L. Lafraia , P. Castanho
{"title":"Pas un rêve de vous, mais un rêve pour vous","authors":"V. J. S. Costa ,&nbsp;A. Maurin Souvignet ,&nbsp;L. Lafraia ,&nbsp;P. Castanho","doi":"10.1016/j.inan.2025.100512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Within the framework of contemporary psychoanalysis, particularly an “expanded psychoanalysis,” we follow René Kaës proposition that dreams occur within a polyphonic network of interdiscursivity. Based on this theoretical perspective, we implemented a device called “Group Dreaming” with elderly participants. To overcome the resistances encountered, we progressively supported an operative group (a device inspired by Pichon-Rivière), centered on the following task: “Reflecting on how dreams can help us understand both the inner world and the outer world.” This group took place in a residential care facility for dependent elderly persons over five weekly sessions.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The analysis method used is qualitative and is based on the “construction of cases” as proposed by Pierre Fédida. This construction follows four steps: the enigma that arises in the analyst's mind, clinical work, supervision, and the production of metapsychology. In this case, the enigma includes the questions that guided the research: “Is it possible to dream knowing that we have little time left to live?”.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this article is to gain a better understanding of the status of dreams and the ability to dream in elderly individuals. However, this study is part of a broader project aimed at re-examining the role of dreams within psychoanalytic theory, as well as in group and contemporary social clinics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Consistent with our previous clinical experiences and René Kaës work, our clinical observations confirm the dual status of subjects, who are always both group subjects and singular subjects. In particular, the data collected reveals that at the end of life, the ability to dream can be reinforced by shifting the act of dreaming for oneself toward an altruistic act: dreaming for another, dreaming for others.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ultimately, the group, composed of elderly individuals and dedicated to exploring dreams as a means of understanding both the inner and outer worlds, allowed us to consider that sharing dreams provided a psychic outlet for death anxiety, fostering the desire to transmit one's lived experiences to future generations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100661,"journal":{"name":"In Analysis","volume":"9 1","pages":"Article 100512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542360625000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在当代精神分析,尤其是 "扩展精神分析 "的框架下,我们遵循勒内-卡尔斯(René Kaës)的主张,即梦境发生在一个多声道的相互传播网络中。基于这一理论视角,我们对老年参与者实施了一种名为 "集体做梦 "的方法。为了克服所遇到的阻力,我们逐步支持了一个操作小组(受 Pichon-Rivière 的启发而设计的装置),其中心任务是:"思考梦境如何帮助我们理解内心世界和外部世界"。该小组活动在一家为依赖他人生活的老年人提供的护理机构中进行,每周举行五次会议。 方法采用的分析方法是定性分析法,以皮埃尔-费迪达提出的 "案例建构法 "为基础。这种建构遵循四个步骤:分析师头脑中产生的谜团、临床工作、督导和元心理学的产生。在本案例中,谜团包括引导研究的问题:"本文旨在更好地了解老年人的梦境和做梦能力。然而,这项研究也是一个更广泛的项目的一部分,旨在重新审视梦在精神分析理论中的作用,以及在团体和当代社会诊所中的作用。结果与我们以往的临床经验和勒内-卡尔斯(René Kaës)的著作相一致,我们的临床观察证实了受试者的双重身份,他们总是既是团体受试者,又是单个受试者。特别是,收集到的数据显示,在生命的最后阶段,做梦的能力可以通过将为自己做梦的行为转变为利他行为而得到加强:为他人做梦,为他人而做梦。结论最终,这个由老年人组成的小组致力于探索梦境,将梦境作为了解内心世界和外部世界的一种手段,这让我们能够考虑到,分享梦境为死亡焦虑提供了一种心理宣泄方式,促进了将自己的生活经历传递给后代的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pas un rêve de vous, mais un rêve pour vous

Context

Within the framework of contemporary psychoanalysis, particularly an “expanded psychoanalysis,” we follow René Kaës proposition that dreams occur within a polyphonic network of interdiscursivity. Based on this theoretical perspective, we implemented a device called “Group Dreaming” with elderly participants. To overcome the resistances encountered, we progressively supported an operative group (a device inspired by Pichon-Rivière), centered on the following task: “Reflecting on how dreams can help us understand both the inner world and the outer world.” This group took place in a residential care facility for dependent elderly persons over five weekly sessions.

Method

The analysis method used is qualitative and is based on the “construction of cases” as proposed by Pierre Fédida. This construction follows four steps: the enigma that arises in the analyst's mind, clinical work, supervision, and the production of metapsychology. In this case, the enigma includes the questions that guided the research: “Is it possible to dream knowing that we have little time left to live?”.

Objective

The aim of this article is to gain a better understanding of the status of dreams and the ability to dream in elderly individuals. However, this study is part of a broader project aimed at re-examining the role of dreams within psychoanalytic theory, as well as in group and contemporary social clinics.

Results

Consistent with our previous clinical experiences and René Kaës work, our clinical observations confirm the dual status of subjects, who are always both group subjects and singular subjects. In particular, the data collected reveals that at the end of life, the ability to dream can be reinforced by shifting the act of dreaming for oneself toward an altruistic act: dreaming for another, dreaming for others.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the group, composed of elderly individuals and dedicated to exploring dreams as a means of understanding both the inner and outer worlds, allowed us to consider that sharing dreams provided a psychic outlet for death anxiety, fostering the desire to transmit one's lived experiences to future generations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信