中游天然气压缩站点传感器连续监测系统性能评估

Shuting Lydia Yang*,  and , Arvind P. Ravikumar, 
{"title":"中游天然气压缩站点传感器连续监测系统性能评估","authors":"Shuting Lydia Yang*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Arvind P. Ravikumar,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0022710.1021/acsestair.4c00227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS) are a promising technology to detect and quantify intermittent and high-volume methane emissions across the oil and gas supply chain. This is particularly salient at midstream compressor stations, where the contribution of short-duration emission events to total emissions makes survey-type technologies less suitable for developing accurate measurement-informed inventories. In this work, we report on the first concurrent and long-term test of five CMS technologies to detect, localize, and quantify methane emission from two major types of midstream compressor stations found in the US – a turbine-only station and an engine-only station. We find that CMS technologies can distinguish between different operational states of engine-driven compressors with large CH<sub>4</sub> emissions contribution from compressor exhaust. Combining known events at these facilities with in situ controlled releases, we observe that all CMS technologies generally struggle in identifying short-duration (&lt;30 min) or low emission rate (relative to baseline) events. Critically, we find that positive event detection, based on analysis of underlying methane signals, frequently did not translate to alerts sent to the operators. Deployment of CMS at midstream compressor stations must proceed with caution based on specific applications, site configuration, and the nature of baseline emissions.</p><p >This study reports on the concurrent test of five Continuous Monitoring Systems to detect, localize, and quantify methane emission and informs the practical deployment and limits of Continuous Monitoring Systems at midstream natural gas facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 4","pages":"466–475 466–475"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00227","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Performance of Point Sensor Continuous Monitoring Systems at Midstream Natural Gas Compressor Stations\",\"authors\":\"Shuting Lydia Yang*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Arvind P. Ravikumar,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestair.4c0022710.1021/acsestair.4c00227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS) are a promising technology to detect and quantify intermittent and high-volume methane emissions across the oil and gas supply chain. This is particularly salient at midstream compressor stations, where the contribution of short-duration emission events to total emissions makes survey-type technologies less suitable for developing accurate measurement-informed inventories. In this work, we report on the first concurrent and long-term test of five CMS technologies to detect, localize, and quantify methane emission from two major types of midstream compressor stations found in the US – a turbine-only station and an engine-only station. We find that CMS technologies can distinguish between different operational states of engine-driven compressors with large CH<sub>4</sub> emissions contribution from compressor exhaust. Combining known events at these facilities with in situ controlled releases, we observe that all CMS technologies generally struggle in identifying short-duration (&lt;30 min) or low emission rate (relative to baseline) events. Critically, we find that positive event detection, based on analysis of underlying methane signals, frequently did not translate to alerts sent to the operators. Deployment of CMS at midstream compressor stations must proceed with caution based on specific applications, site configuration, and the nature of baseline emissions.</p><p >This study reports on the concurrent test of five Continuous Monitoring Systems to detect, localize, and quantify methane emission and informs the practical deployment and limits of Continuous Monitoring Systems at midstream natural gas facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"466–475 466–475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00227\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

连续监测系统(CMS)是一项很有前途的技术,可以检测和量化油气供应链中间歇性和大量的甲烷排放。这在中游压缩站尤其突出,在中游压缩站,短时间排放事件对总排放量的贡献使得调查型技术不太适合开发精确的测量信息清单。在这项工作中,我们报告了五种CMS技术的首次同步和长期测试,以检测、定位和量化美国两种主要类型的中流压缩站的甲烷排放——仅涡轮站和仅发动机站。我们发现CMS技术可以区分压缩机排气中CH4排放量较大的发动机驱动压缩机的不同运行状态。结合这些设施的已知事件和原位控制释放,我们观察到所有CMS技术通常难以识别短时间(30分钟)或低排放率(相对于基线)事件。至关重要的是,我们发现基于底层甲烷信号分析的积极事件检测通常不会转化为发送给运营商的警报。在中游压缩站部署CMS必须根据具体应用、现场配置和基线排放的性质谨慎进行。本研究报告了五个连续监测系统的并发测试,以检测、定位和量化甲烷排放,并告知连续监测系统在中游天然气设施中的实际部署和限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Performance of Point Sensor Continuous Monitoring Systems at Midstream Natural Gas Compressor Stations

Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS) are a promising technology to detect and quantify intermittent and high-volume methane emissions across the oil and gas supply chain. This is particularly salient at midstream compressor stations, where the contribution of short-duration emission events to total emissions makes survey-type technologies less suitable for developing accurate measurement-informed inventories. In this work, we report on the first concurrent and long-term test of five CMS technologies to detect, localize, and quantify methane emission from two major types of midstream compressor stations found in the US – a turbine-only station and an engine-only station. We find that CMS technologies can distinguish between different operational states of engine-driven compressors with large CH4 emissions contribution from compressor exhaust. Combining known events at these facilities with in situ controlled releases, we observe that all CMS technologies generally struggle in identifying short-duration (<30 min) or low emission rate (relative to baseline) events. Critically, we find that positive event detection, based on analysis of underlying methane signals, frequently did not translate to alerts sent to the operators. Deployment of CMS at midstream compressor stations must proceed with caution based on specific applications, site configuration, and the nature of baseline emissions.

This study reports on the concurrent test of five Continuous Monitoring Systems to detect, localize, and quantify methane emission and informs the practical deployment and limits of Continuous Monitoring Systems at midstream natural gas facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信