支持水循环风险框架的定量相关化学评估

IF 4.8 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Christopher H. Jones*, Riley E. Mulhern, Varsha Wylie, John Fawell, Shubhashini Oza, Melanie Holmer and Katherine Bell, 
{"title":"支持水循环风险框架的定量相关化学评估","authors":"Christopher H. Jones*,&nbsp;Riley E. Mulhern,&nbsp;Varsha Wylie,&nbsp;John Fawell,&nbsp;Shubhashini Oza,&nbsp;Melanie Holmer and Katherine Bell,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0114010.1021/acsestwater.4c01140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Water resources around the world are increasingly affected by the pressures of population growth and climate change, with substantial risks of water shortages for public supply, agriculture, energy generation, and industry, with impacts on freshwater ecology. Thus, many water utilities are turning to or considering water recycling to augment existing supplies. It is incumbent on a utility to demonstrate that augmenting its water supply with recycled water does not create undue excess risk compared to existing sources that are considered protective of public health. This research quantified the chemical risks associated with using recycled water as a source of water supply. Linear cancer slope factors and threshold dose values were used with chemical concentrations measured at an advanced water recycling pilot in the southern UK to quantify chemical risk profiles of six waters: two existing drinking water source waters, a secondary treated wastewater effluent serving as the influent to the advanced water treatment pilot, and after each treatment step in the pilot (ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet advanced oxidation). This study builds on previous work by considering risks throughout the advanced water recycling treatment train via Monte Carlo simulation and evaluating several approaches to handling censored data sets; the analysis leveraged data from an extensive sampling campaign including 37 cancer risk chemicals and 289 threshold-based risk chemicals. Overall, conclusions around relative risk were relatively insensitive to the approach used for handling censored data, while using a stochastic method provided improved insights into the variability of risk. Cancer and noncancer risk profiles of water treated through the advanced treatment train were comparable or better than existing water supply works source waters. This finding provides strong evidence that use of highly treated recycled water as a source of supply is protective of public health from chemical risks when compared to existing source water supplies.</p><p >This risk assessment approach uses novel methods to provide public health insights into the use of recycled water as a water supply source.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"5 4","pages":"1779–1788 1779–1788"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01140","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Relative Chemical Assessment to Support Risk Frameworks for Water Recycling\",\"authors\":\"Christopher H. Jones*,&nbsp;Riley E. Mulhern,&nbsp;Varsha Wylie,&nbsp;John Fawell,&nbsp;Shubhashini Oza,&nbsp;Melanie Holmer and Katherine Bell,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestwater.4c0114010.1021/acsestwater.4c01140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Water resources around the world are increasingly affected by the pressures of population growth and climate change, with substantial risks of water shortages for public supply, agriculture, energy generation, and industry, with impacts on freshwater ecology. Thus, many water utilities are turning to or considering water recycling to augment existing supplies. It is incumbent on a utility to demonstrate that augmenting its water supply with recycled water does not create undue excess risk compared to existing sources that are considered protective of public health. This research quantified the chemical risks associated with using recycled water as a source of water supply. Linear cancer slope factors and threshold dose values were used with chemical concentrations measured at an advanced water recycling pilot in the southern UK to quantify chemical risk profiles of six waters: two existing drinking water source waters, a secondary treated wastewater effluent serving as the influent to the advanced water treatment pilot, and after each treatment step in the pilot (ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet advanced oxidation). This study builds on previous work by considering risks throughout the advanced water recycling treatment train via Monte Carlo simulation and evaluating several approaches to handling censored data sets; the analysis leveraged data from an extensive sampling campaign including 37 cancer risk chemicals and 289 threshold-based risk chemicals. Overall, conclusions around relative risk were relatively insensitive to the approach used for handling censored data, while using a stochastic method provided improved insights into the variability of risk. Cancer and noncancer risk profiles of water treated through the advanced treatment train were comparable or better than existing water supply works source waters. This finding provides strong evidence that use of highly treated recycled water as a source of supply is protective of public health from chemical risks when compared to existing source water supplies.</p><p >This risk assessment approach uses novel methods to provide public health insights into the use of recycled water as a water supply source.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"1779–1788 1779–1788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01140\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的水资源正日益受到人口增长和气候变化压力的影响,公共供应、农业、能源生产和工业面临水资源短缺的重大风险,并对淡水生态产生影响。因此,许多自来水公司正在转向或考虑水循环利用,以增加现有的供应。公用事业公司有责任证明,与被认为可以保护公众健康的现有水源相比,用再生水增加供水不会造成过度的风险。这项研究量化了使用循环水作为供水来源所带来的化学风险。线性癌症斜率因子和阈值剂量值与在英国南部高级水循环试验中测量的化学浓度一起使用,以量化六种水的化学风险概况:两种现有的饮用水源水,一种二级处理的废水作为高级水处理试验的进水,以及在试验中的每个处理步骤(超滤,反渗透和紫外线高级氧化)之后。本研究建立在以前的工作基础上,通过蒙特卡罗模拟考虑了整个高级水循环处理流程的风险,并评估了处理审查数据集的几种方法;该分析利用了来自广泛抽样活动的数据,包括37种癌症风险化学品和289种基于阈值的风险化学品。总的来说,关于相对风险的结论对处理审查数据的方法相对不敏感,而使用随机方法可以更好地了解风险的可变性。通过高级处理系统处理的水的癌症和非癌症风险概况与现有供水工程的水源相当或更好。这一发现提供了强有力的证据,证明与现有水源供应相比,使用经过高度处理的再生水作为供应水源可以保护公众健康,避免化学品风险。这种风险评估方法采用新颖的方法,为使用循环水作为供水水源提供公共卫生方面的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Relative Chemical Assessment to Support Risk Frameworks for Water Recycling

Water resources around the world are increasingly affected by the pressures of population growth and climate change, with substantial risks of water shortages for public supply, agriculture, energy generation, and industry, with impacts on freshwater ecology. Thus, many water utilities are turning to or considering water recycling to augment existing supplies. It is incumbent on a utility to demonstrate that augmenting its water supply with recycled water does not create undue excess risk compared to existing sources that are considered protective of public health. This research quantified the chemical risks associated with using recycled water as a source of water supply. Linear cancer slope factors and threshold dose values were used with chemical concentrations measured at an advanced water recycling pilot in the southern UK to quantify chemical risk profiles of six waters: two existing drinking water source waters, a secondary treated wastewater effluent serving as the influent to the advanced water treatment pilot, and after each treatment step in the pilot (ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet advanced oxidation). This study builds on previous work by considering risks throughout the advanced water recycling treatment train via Monte Carlo simulation and evaluating several approaches to handling censored data sets; the analysis leveraged data from an extensive sampling campaign including 37 cancer risk chemicals and 289 threshold-based risk chemicals. Overall, conclusions around relative risk were relatively insensitive to the approach used for handling censored data, while using a stochastic method provided improved insights into the variability of risk. Cancer and noncancer risk profiles of water treated through the advanced treatment train were comparable or better than existing water supply works source waters. This finding provides strong evidence that use of highly treated recycled water as a source of supply is protective of public health from chemical risks when compared to existing source water supplies.

This risk assessment approach uses novel methods to provide public health insights into the use of recycled water as a water supply source.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信