对低收入和中等收入国家感染预防和控制规划现状的全面审查。

Saima Asghar, Muhammad Atif, Imran Masood, Madiha Khan
{"title":"对低收入和中等收入国家感染预防和控制规划现状的全面审查。","authors":"Saima Asghar, Muhammad Atif, Imran Masood, Madiha Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to underscore the adoption and implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices based on the World Health Organization's Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods and design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Guiding methodology: </strong>Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, grey literature and reference lists of studies published between January 2018 and September 2024.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria to recruit studies: </strong>Peer reviewed full length, cross-sectional, mixed method and quasi-experimental studies written in English, conducted in LMICs and used IPCAF as assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted on a data extraction form and quality of studies was evaluated by using the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields. Evidence was generated as a group of themes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 24 studies were selected based on eligibility criteria. IPC program was implemented to a varying degree in healthcare facilities (HCFs) of LMICs. Key barriers reported were; no allocation of budget for IPC, insufficient staffing of full-time IPC professionals, absence of clear IPC goals, challenges in staff training, lack of resources, no periodic monitoring and inconsistent availability of IPC supplies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was an evidence on implementation of IPC program in the HCFs of LMICs, however, LMICs faced substantial challenges in achieving consistent and effective IPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive review of current status of infection prevention and control program in low- and middle-income countries.\",\"authors\":\"Saima Asghar, Muhammad Atif, Imran Masood, Madiha Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idh.2025.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to underscore the adoption and implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices based on the World Health Organization's Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods and design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Guiding methodology: </strong>Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, grey literature and reference lists of studies published between January 2018 and September 2024.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria to recruit studies: </strong>Peer reviewed full length, cross-sectional, mixed method and quasi-experimental studies written in English, conducted in LMICs and used IPCAF as assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted on a data extraction form and quality of studies was evaluated by using the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields. Evidence was generated as a group of themes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 24 studies were selected based on eligibility criteria. IPC program was implemented to a varying degree in healthcare facilities (HCFs) of LMICs. Key barriers reported were; no allocation of budget for IPC, insufficient staffing of full-time IPC professionals, absence of clear IPC goals, challenges in staff training, lack of resources, no periodic monitoring and inconsistent availability of IPC supplies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was an evidence on implementation of IPC program in the HCFs of LMICs, however, LMICs faced substantial challenges in achieving consistent and effective IPC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection, disease & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection, disease & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.03.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection, disease & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.03.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述旨在强调在低收入和中等收入国家采用和实施基于世界卫生组织感染预防和控制评估框架(IPCAF)的感染预防和控制(IPC)做法。方法与设计:系统评价。指导方法:Cochrane系统评价手册和首选报告项目的系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南。数据来源:PubMed,谷歌Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, 2018年1月至2024年9月间发表的灰色文献和参考文献列表。纳入研究的资格标准:同行评议的完整长度、横断面、混合方法和准实验研究,用英文撰写,在低收入国家进行,并使用IPCAF作为评估工具。数据提取和综合:从数据提取表中提取数据,并使用评估不同领域主要研究论文的标准质量评估标准对研究质量进行评估。证据是作为一组主题生成的。结果:根据入选标准共入选24项研究。IPC计划在低收入和中等收入国家的医疗机构(hcf)中得到了不同程度的实施。报告的主要障碍有:没有为IPC分配预算,全职IPC专业人员配备不足,缺乏明确的IPC目标,工作人员培训面临挑战,缺乏资源,没有定期监测,IPC供应不稳定。结论:有证据表明在中低收入国家的hcf中实施了IPC计划,然而,中低收入国家在实现一致和有效的IPC方面面临着重大挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive review of current status of infection prevention and control program in low- and middle-income countries.

Objective: This systematic review aims to underscore the adoption and implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices based on the World Health Organization's Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods and design: Systematic review.

Guiding methodology: Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Data sources: PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, grey literature and reference lists of studies published between January 2018 and September 2024.

Eligibility criteria to recruit studies: Peer reviewed full length, cross-sectional, mixed method and quasi-experimental studies written in English, conducted in LMICs and used IPCAF as assessment tool.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted on a data extraction form and quality of studies was evaluated by using the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields. Evidence was generated as a group of themes.

Findings: In total, 24 studies were selected based on eligibility criteria. IPC program was implemented to a varying degree in healthcare facilities (HCFs) of LMICs. Key barriers reported were; no allocation of budget for IPC, insufficient staffing of full-time IPC professionals, absence of clear IPC goals, challenges in staff training, lack of resources, no periodic monitoring and inconsistent availability of IPC supplies.

Conclusions: There was an evidence on implementation of IPC program in the HCFs of LMICs, however, LMICs faced substantial challenges in achieving consistent and effective IPC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信