软件和硬件版本对 Apple Watch 活动测量的影响:COVFIT 回顾性队列研究的二次分析。

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-04-08 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000727
Shelby L Sturrock, Rahim Moineddin, Dionne Gesink, Sarah Woodruff, Daniel Fuller
{"title":"软件和硬件版本对 Apple Watch 活动测量的影响:COVFIT 回顾性队列研究的二次分析。","authors":"Shelby L Sturrock, Rahim Moineddin, Dionne Gesink, Sarah Woodruff, Daniel Fuller","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of software and hardware version on Apple Watch activity measurement using data from the COVFIT retrospective cohort study. We estimated the impact of software and hardware versions on activity measurement by comparing daily active calories and daily exercise minutes in the 7 days before and 7 days after upgrading from watchOS 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9 or between two hardware versions. For each transition, we fit mixed effect negative binomial regression models to estimate the effect of the upgrade on daily (a) exercise minutes and (b) active calories, overall and stratified by sex, with and without adjusting for weekday. We also calculated and plotted the mean person-level change in average activity levels between the two weeks. As a control, we repeated the entire analysis comparing activity data two weeks before vs. one week before each upgrade. 253 participants contributed data about at least one transition (software = 250, hardware = 74). Hardware upgrades were not associated with either outcome; however, some software upgrades were. Upgrading from watchOS 7 to 8 was associated with a large, statistically significant increase in daily exercise minutes (unadjusted rate ratio (RR) = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.20). WatchOS 6 to 7 and 8 to 9 transitions were associated with statistically significant decreases in daily exercise minutes (6 to 7: unadjusted RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99; 8 to 9: unadjusted RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.96) and active calories (6 to 7: RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99); 8 to 9: RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99). There was no significant change in either outcome during in the two-week control period for most transitions. Differences in software version over time or between people may confound physical activity analyses using Apple Watch data.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 4","pages":"e0000727"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of software and hardware version on Apple Watch activity measurement: A secondary analysis of the COVFIT retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Shelby L Sturrock, Rahim Moineddin, Dionne Gesink, Sarah Woodruff, Daniel Fuller\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of software and hardware version on Apple Watch activity measurement using data from the COVFIT retrospective cohort study. We estimated the impact of software and hardware versions on activity measurement by comparing daily active calories and daily exercise minutes in the 7 days before and 7 days after upgrading from watchOS 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9 or between two hardware versions. For each transition, we fit mixed effect negative binomial regression models to estimate the effect of the upgrade on daily (a) exercise minutes and (b) active calories, overall and stratified by sex, with and without adjusting for weekday. We also calculated and plotted the mean person-level change in average activity levels between the two weeks. As a control, we repeated the entire analysis comparing activity data two weeks before vs. one week before each upgrade. 253 participants contributed data about at least one transition (software = 250, hardware = 74). Hardware upgrades were not associated with either outcome; however, some software upgrades were. Upgrading from watchOS 7 to 8 was associated with a large, statistically significant increase in daily exercise minutes (unadjusted rate ratio (RR) = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.20). WatchOS 6 to 7 and 8 to 9 transitions were associated with statistically significant decreases in daily exercise minutes (6 to 7: unadjusted RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99; 8 to 9: unadjusted RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.96) and active calories (6 to 7: RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99); 8 to 9: RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99). There was no significant change in either outcome during in the two-week control period for most transitions. Differences in software version over time or between people may confound physical activity analyses using Apple Watch data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"e0000727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977988/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是利用COVFIT回顾性队列研究的数据,估计软件和硬件版本对Apple Watch活动测量的影响。我们通过比较从watchOS 5升级到6、6升级到7、7升级到8、8升级到9或两个硬件版本之间的7天内每日活动卡路里和每日运动分钟数,来估计软件和硬件版本对活动测量的影响。对于每个转变,我们拟合混合效应负二项回归模型来估计升级对每日(a)运动时间和(b)活跃卡路里的影响,总体上和按性别分层,有无调整工作日。我们还计算并绘制了两周内平均活动水平的平均个人水平变化。作为对照,我们重复整个分析,比较每次升级前两周和一周的活动数据。253名参与者提供了至少一次转变的数据(软件= 250,硬件= 74)。硬件升级与两种结果都无关;然而,一些软件升级是。从watchOS 7升级到8与每日运动时间显著增加相关(未调整比率比(RR) = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.20)。WatchOS 6 - 7和8 - 9转换与每日运动时间显著减少相关(6 - 7:未调整RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99;8 - 9:未经调整的RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.96)和活性卡路里(6 - 7:RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99);8 ~ 9: RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99)。在大多数过渡的两周对照期内,两种结果都没有显著变化。随着时间的推移或人与人之间软件版本的差异可能会混淆使用Apple Watch数据进行的身体活动分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of software and hardware version on Apple Watch activity measurement: A secondary analysis of the COVFIT retrospective cohort study.

The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of software and hardware version on Apple Watch activity measurement using data from the COVFIT retrospective cohort study. We estimated the impact of software and hardware versions on activity measurement by comparing daily active calories and daily exercise minutes in the 7 days before and 7 days after upgrading from watchOS 5 to 6, 6 to 7, 7 to 8, 8 to 9 or between two hardware versions. For each transition, we fit mixed effect negative binomial regression models to estimate the effect of the upgrade on daily (a) exercise minutes and (b) active calories, overall and stratified by sex, with and without adjusting for weekday. We also calculated and plotted the mean person-level change in average activity levels between the two weeks. As a control, we repeated the entire analysis comparing activity data two weeks before vs. one week before each upgrade. 253 participants contributed data about at least one transition (software = 250, hardware = 74). Hardware upgrades were not associated with either outcome; however, some software upgrades were. Upgrading from watchOS 7 to 8 was associated with a large, statistically significant increase in daily exercise minutes (unadjusted rate ratio (RR) = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.20). WatchOS 6 to 7 and 8 to 9 transitions were associated with statistically significant decreases in daily exercise minutes (6 to 7: unadjusted RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.99; 8 to 9: unadjusted RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.96) and active calories (6 to 7: RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99); 8 to 9: RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.99). There was no significant change in either outcome during in the two-week control period for most transitions. Differences in software version over time or between people may confound physical activity analyses using Apple Watch data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信