一项针对食品不安全和肥胖成年人的农产品处方计划的随机对照试验。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000001215
Ariana M Chao, Alexandra Paul, Nainika Vaidya, Aleena Ghanta
{"title":"一项针对食品不安全和肥胖成年人的农产品处方计划的随机对照试验。","authors":"Ariana M Chao, Alexandra Paul, Nainika Vaidya, Aleena Ghanta","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Produce prescription programs may improve dietary quality and health but have not been well tested among adults with food insecurity and obesity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim in this pilot randomized controlled trial was to examine the feasibility and preliminary effects of ProduceRx, a produce program combined with behavioral weight loss counseling, compared with wait-list control (WLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with obesity and food insecurity (N = 32) were randomly assigned to ProduceRx or WLC. ProduceRx had weekly counseling sessions and received $20 of produce vouchers weekly, whereas WLC had a 12-week wait period before enrolling in the program. All participants completed assessments at baseline and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The retention rate was 90.6%. Groups did not differ significantly in changes in dietary quality, food security, mood, and stress. ProduceRx lost 2.4% ± 0.7% of initial body weight, which was more than WLC who gained 0.4% ± 0.7% ( P = .01). Compared with WLC, ProduceRx had significantly greater improvements in eating self-efficacy ( P = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Produce prescriptions combined with behavioral weight loss demonstrated preliminary feasibility and efficacy in helping adults with food insecurity and obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"E182-E187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Produce Prescription Program for Adults With Food Insecurity and Obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Ariana M Chao, Alexandra Paul, Nainika Vaidya, Aleena Ghanta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Produce prescription programs may improve dietary quality and health but have not been well tested among adults with food insecurity and obesity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim in this pilot randomized controlled trial was to examine the feasibility and preliminary effects of ProduceRx, a produce program combined with behavioral weight loss counseling, compared with wait-list control (WLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with obesity and food insecurity (N = 32) were randomly assigned to ProduceRx or WLC. ProduceRx had weekly counseling sessions and received $20 of produce vouchers weekly, whereas WLC had a 12-week wait period before enrolling in the program. All participants completed assessments at baseline and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The retention rate was 90.6%. Groups did not differ significantly in changes in dietary quality, food security, mood, and stress. ProduceRx lost 2.4% ± 0.7% of initial body weight, which was more than WLC who gained 0.4% ± 0.7% ( P = .01). Compared with WLC, ProduceRx had significantly greater improvements in eating self-efficacy ( P = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Produce prescriptions combined with behavioral weight loss demonstrated preliminary feasibility and efficacy in helping adults with food insecurity and obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E182-E187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001215\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:农产品处方计划可以改善膳食质量和健康,但尚未在粮食不安全和肥胖的成年人中进行过很好的测试:我们在这项随机对照试验中的目的是研究 ProduceRx 的可行性和初步效果,ProduceRx 是一项与行为减肥咨询相结合的农产品计划,与等待名单对照组(WLC)进行了比较:方法:患有肥胖症和食物无保障的成年人(32 人)被随机分配到 ProduceRx 或 WLC。ProduceRx每周进行一次咨询,每周获得20美元的农产品券,而WLC则需要等待12周才能参加该计划。所有参与者都完成了基线和 12 周的评估:结果:保留率为 90.6%。各组在饮食质量、食品安全、情绪和压力方面的变化差异不大。ProduceRx 的体重减轻了 2.4% ± 0.7%,高于 WLC 的 0.4% ± 0.7%(P = .01)。与WLC相比,ProduceRx在饮食自我效能方面的改善幅度更大(P = .04):农产品处方与行为减肥相结合,在帮助食物不安全和肥胖的成年人方面显示出初步的可行性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Produce Prescription Program for Adults With Food Insecurity and Obesity.

Background: Produce prescription programs may improve dietary quality and health but have not been well tested among adults with food insecurity and obesity.

Objective: Our aim in this pilot randomized controlled trial was to examine the feasibility and preliminary effects of ProduceRx, a produce program combined with behavioral weight loss counseling, compared with wait-list control (WLC).

Methods: Adults with obesity and food insecurity (N = 32) were randomly assigned to ProduceRx or WLC. ProduceRx had weekly counseling sessions and received $20 of produce vouchers weekly, whereas WLC had a 12-week wait period before enrolling in the program. All participants completed assessments at baseline and 12 weeks.

Results: The retention rate was 90.6%. Groups did not differ significantly in changes in dietary quality, food security, mood, and stress. ProduceRx lost 2.4% ± 0.7% of initial body weight, which was more than WLC who gained 0.4% ± 0.7% ( P = .01). Compared with WLC, ProduceRx had significantly greater improvements in eating self-efficacy ( P = .04).

Conclusions: Produce prescriptions combined with behavioral weight loss demonstrated preliminary feasibility and efficacy in helping adults with food insecurity and obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信