[德国老年劳动力中的运营整合管理(OIM)——来自lidA队列研究的发现]。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1055/a-2536-3364
Hans Martin Hasselhorn, Merle Riechmann-Wolf, Wiebke Wrage, Uta Wegewitz, Alexandra Sikora
{"title":"[德国老年劳动力中的运营整合管理(OIM)——来自lidA队列研究的发现]。","authors":"Hans Martin Hasselhorn, Merle Riechmann-Wolf, Wiebke Wrage, Uta Wegewitz, Alexandra Sikora","doi":"10.1055/a-2536-3364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of the statutory operational integration management (OIM) among the older workforce in Germany.Since 2011, the representative lidA cohort study (www.lida-studie.de) has been investigating work, health and employment among the socially insured working population, born in 1959, 1965, and (since 2022/23) in 1971 in Germany. The recent assessment wave 2022/2023 included a newly developed OIM module.Of 7,335 employed participants, 819 (11.2%) reported more than 30 days sickness absence in the past 12 months, thus indicating eligibility to OIM. Of those, 282 (34.4%) had received an OIM offer proactively by their employer. Higher odds of receiving an offer were found for those with longer sickness absence, in larger enterprises, in enterprises which value the workers' health, and among those who, during the COVID-19 pandemic, had used the option to work from home. About a third of those who had received an offer declined it, mainly because they felt no need for it; 132 of the 819 OIM eligible participants (16.1%) reported they had been offered and had accepted at least one measure implemented by the enterprise, most often \"stepwise reintegration\", followed by \"regular feedback talks with the superior\". Among them, 114 (90.8% of 132) rated the measures implemented as \"somewhat\", or \"very helpful\".Twenty years after the legal introduction of OIM, it is still insufficiently implemented, although - where measures have been implemented - these are almost always rated as helpful by those who have received them. The barriers to implementation of this obviously useful instrument in enterprises and proposals as to how to overcome them need to be investigated more intensively. National stakeholders in Occupational Safety and Health, the statutory occupational health insurance, labour authorities, and the statutory health insurances, as well as the statutory pension insurance could contribute in raising awareness in the course of their consultation activities in the enterprises.</p>","PeriodicalId":54504,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation","volume":"64 2","pages":"101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Operational integration management (OIM) among the Older Work Force in Germany - Findings from the lidA Cohort Study].\",\"authors\":\"Hans Martin Hasselhorn, Merle Riechmann-Wolf, Wiebke Wrage, Uta Wegewitz, Alexandra Sikora\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2536-3364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of the statutory operational integration management (OIM) among the older workforce in Germany.Since 2011, the representative lidA cohort study (www.lida-studie.de) has been investigating work, health and employment among the socially insured working population, born in 1959, 1965, and (since 2022/23) in 1971 in Germany. The recent assessment wave 2022/2023 included a newly developed OIM module.Of 7,335 employed participants, 819 (11.2%) reported more than 30 days sickness absence in the past 12 months, thus indicating eligibility to OIM. Of those, 282 (34.4%) had received an OIM offer proactively by their employer. Higher odds of receiving an offer were found for those with longer sickness absence, in larger enterprises, in enterprises which value the workers' health, and among those who, during the COVID-19 pandemic, had used the option to work from home. About a third of those who had received an offer declined it, mainly because they felt no need for it; 132 of the 819 OIM eligible participants (16.1%) reported they had been offered and had accepted at least one measure implemented by the enterprise, most often \\\"stepwise reintegration\\\", followed by \\\"regular feedback talks with the superior\\\". Among them, 114 (90.8% of 132) rated the measures implemented as \\\"somewhat\\\", or \\\"very helpful\\\".Twenty years after the legal introduction of OIM, it is still insufficiently implemented, although - where measures have been implemented - these are almost always rated as helpful by those who have received them. The barriers to implementation of this obviously useful instrument in enterprises and proposals as to how to overcome them need to be investigated more intensively. National stakeholders in Occupational Safety and Health, the statutory occupational health insurance, labour authorities, and the statutory health insurances, as well as the statutory pension insurance could contribute in raising awareness in the course of their consultation activities in the enterprises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"64 2\",\"pages\":\"101-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2536-3364\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2536-3364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是调查德国老年劳动力中法定运营整合管理(OIM)的实施情况。自2011年以来,具有代表性的lidA队列研究(www.lida-studie.de)一直在调查1959年、1965年出生和1971年(自2022/23年以来)在德国参加社会保险的工作人口的工作、健康和就业情况。最近的2022/2023年评估浪潮包括一个新开发的OIM模块。在7,335名受雇参加者中,819人(11.2%)报告在过去12个月内病假超过30天,从而表明有资格参加OIM。其中,282人(34.4%)曾获雇主主动提供海外进修机会。在病假时间较长的员工、大型企业员工、重视员工健康的企业员工以及在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间选择在家工作的员工中,获得工作机会的几率更高。约有三分之一收到工作邀请的人拒绝了,主要是因为他们觉得没有这个必要;在819名合格的OIM参与者中,有132人(16.1%)报告说,企业向他们提供并接受了至少一项措施,最常见的是“逐步重返社会”,然后是“与上级进行定期反馈会谈”。其中,114名受访者(占132名受访者的90.8%)对实施的措施评价为“有些”或“非常有帮助”。在OIM法律上实行二十年后,它仍然没有得到充分的执行,尽管在已经执行措施的地方,这些措施几乎总是被接受这些措施的人评价为有帮助。需要更深入地调查妨碍企业执行这一显然有用的文书的障碍以及如何克服这些障碍的建议。职业安全和健康方面的国家利益攸关方、法定职业健康保险、劳工当局、法定健康保险以及法定养恤金保险可以在其对企业进行咨询活动的过程中为提高认识作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Operational integration management (OIM) among the Older Work Force in Germany - Findings from the lidA Cohort Study].

The aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of the statutory operational integration management (OIM) among the older workforce in Germany.Since 2011, the representative lidA cohort study (www.lida-studie.de) has been investigating work, health and employment among the socially insured working population, born in 1959, 1965, and (since 2022/23) in 1971 in Germany. The recent assessment wave 2022/2023 included a newly developed OIM module.Of 7,335 employed participants, 819 (11.2%) reported more than 30 days sickness absence in the past 12 months, thus indicating eligibility to OIM. Of those, 282 (34.4%) had received an OIM offer proactively by their employer. Higher odds of receiving an offer were found for those with longer sickness absence, in larger enterprises, in enterprises which value the workers' health, and among those who, during the COVID-19 pandemic, had used the option to work from home. About a third of those who had received an offer declined it, mainly because they felt no need for it; 132 of the 819 OIM eligible participants (16.1%) reported they had been offered and had accepted at least one measure implemented by the enterprise, most often "stepwise reintegration", followed by "regular feedback talks with the superior". Among them, 114 (90.8% of 132) rated the measures implemented as "somewhat", or "very helpful".Twenty years after the legal introduction of OIM, it is still insufficiently implemented, although - where measures have been implemented - these are almost always rated as helpful by those who have received them. The barriers to implementation of this obviously useful instrument in enterprises and proposals as to how to overcome them need to be investigated more intensively. National stakeholders in Occupational Safety and Health, the statutory occupational health insurance, labour authorities, and the statutory health insurances, as well as the statutory pension insurance could contribute in raising awareness in the course of their consultation activities in the enterprises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift Die Rehabilitation richtet sich an Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeiter in Einrichtungen, Forschungsinstitutionen und Trägern der Rehabilitation. Sie berichtet über die medizinischen, gesetzlichen, politischen und gesellschaftlichen Grundlagen und Rahmenbedingungen der Rehabilitation und über internationale Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet. Schwerpunkte sind dabei Beiträge zu Rehabilitationspraxis (medizinische, berufliche und soziale Rehabilitation, Qualitätsmanagement, neue Konzepte und Versorgungsmodelle zur Anwendung der ICF, Bewegungstherapie etc.), Rehabilitationsforschung (praxisrelevante Ergebnisse, Methoden und Assessments, Leitlinienentwicklung, sozialmedizinische Fragen), Public Health, Sozialmedizin Gesundheits-System-Forschung sowie die daraus resultierenden Probleme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信