一个身心活动计划的可行性,为英语和西班牙语老年人慢性疼痛在共享医疗访问在社区诊所。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Katherine A McDermott, Claire L Szapary, Elizabeth M Allen, Julie R Brewer, Clara C Vonderheide, Natalia Giraldo-Santiago, Nadine S Levey, Danielle E La Camera, Roger Pasinski, Jonathan Greenberg, Christine S Ritchie, Ana-Maria Vranceanu
{"title":"一个身心活动计划的可行性,为英语和西班牙语老年人慢性疼痛在共享医疗访问在社区诊所。","authors":"Katherine A McDermott, Claire L Szapary, Elizabeth M Allen, Julie R Brewer, Clara C Vonderheide, Natalia Giraldo-Santiago, Nadine S Levey, Danielle E La Camera, Roger Pasinski, Jonathan Greenberg, Christine S Ritchie, Ana-Maria Vranceanu","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Underserved older adults with chronic pain receive pain treatment predominantly in primary care. However, these clinics often lack resources and access to evidence-based psychosocial pain management. Shared medical visits, in which patients receive care in a group setting, offer a practical avenue for implementing psychosocial pain management. We conducted an open pilot study with exit interviews (NIH stage 1a) assessing the feasibility of GetActive+, an efficacious mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain in a community clinic delivered via shared medical visits.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Twenty English-speaking and 13 Spanish-speaking older adults with chronic pain from a community primary care clinic participated in GetActive+. Our a priori set primary outcomes were feasibility (≥75% of patients approached agree to participate), acceptability (≥75% of patients enrolled complete 8/10 sessions), and fidelity (≥75% of session components delivered as intended). We also assessed preliminary quantitative outcomes, including multimodal physical function (ActiGraph, PROMIS physical function, 6-minute walk test), pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory; PEG), and emotional function (depression and anxiety symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We exceeded our benchmarks for feasibility (86.8%), acceptability (93.9%), and fidelity (97.9%). Participants demonstrated improvement in self-reported physical function and 6-minute walk test, pain intensity and interference, and depressive symptoms but not in ActiGraph step count or anxiety symptoms. Exit interviews supported the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>GetActive+ exceeded feasibility benchmarks and offers promise in making psychosocial pain management more accessible in the community via group delivery by any available provider.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a Mind-Body Activity Program for English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults With Chronic Pain Delivered Within Shared Medical Visits in a Community Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine A McDermott, Claire L Szapary, Elizabeth M Allen, Julie R Brewer, Clara C Vonderheide, Natalia Giraldo-Santiago, Nadine S Levey, Danielle E La Camera, Roger Pasinski, Jonathan Greenberg, Christine S Ritchie, Ana-Maria Vranceanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnaf124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Underserved older adults with chronic pain receive pain treatment predominantly in primary care. However, these clinics often lack resources and access to evidence-based psychosocial pain management. Shared medical visits, in which patients receive care in a group setting, offer a practical avenue for implementing psychosocial pain management. We conducted an open pilot study with exit interviews (NIH stage 1a) assessing the feasibility of GetActive+, an efficacious mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain in a community clinic delivered via shared medical visits.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Twenty English-speaking and 13 Spanish-speaking older adults with chronic pain from a community primary care clinic participated in GetActive+. Our a priori set primary outcomes were feasibility (≥75% of patients approached agree to participate), acceptability (≥75% of patients enrolled complete 8/10 sessions), and fidelity (≥75% of session components delivered as intended). We also assessed preliminary quantitative outcomes, including multimodal physical function (ActiGraph, PROMIS physical function, 6-minute walk test), pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory; PEG), and emotional function (depression and anxiety symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We exceeded our benchmarks for feasibility (86.8%), acceptability (93.9%), and fidelity (97.9%). Participants demonstrated improvement in self-reported physical function and 6-minute walk test, pain intensity and interference, and depressive symptoms but not in ActiGraph step count or anxiety symptoms. Exit interviews supported the quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>GetActive+ exceeded feasibility benchmarks and offers promise in making psychosocial pain management more accessible in the community via group delivery by any available provider.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:缺医少药的慢性疼痛老年人主要在初级保健中接受疼痛治疗。然而,这些诊所往往缺乏资源和获得循证心理社会疼痛管理的途径。患者在集体环境中接受护理的共同就诊,为实施心理社会疼痛管理提供了切实可行的途径。我们进行了一项开放的试点研究,通过退出访谈(NIH阶段1a)评估GetActive+的可行性,GetActive+是一种有效的身心活动干预,用于通过共享医疗访问在社区诊所提供慢性疼痛的老年人。研究设计和方法:来自社区初级保健诊所的20名说英语和13名说西班牙语的慢性疼痛老年人参加了GetActive+。我们的先验主要结局包括可行性(≥75%的患者同意参与)、可接受性(≥75%的患者完成了8/10个疗程)和保真度(≥75%的疗程成分如期交付)。我们还评估了初步的定量结果,包括多模态身体功能(ActiGraph、PROMIS身体功能、6分钟步行测试)、疼痛强度和干扰(Brief pain Inventory;PEG)和情绪功能(抑郁和焦虑症状)。结果:可行性(86.8%)、可接受性(93.9%)和保真度(97.9%)均超过了我们的标准。参与者在自我报告的身体功能和6分钟步行测试、疼痛强度和干扰以及抑郁症状方面表现出改善,但在ActiGraph步数或焦虑症状方面没有改善。离职访谈支持了定量调查结果。讨论和影响:GetActive+超过了可行性基准,并承诺通过任何可用提供者的小组交付,使社会心理疼痛管理更容易在社区获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of a Mind-Body Activity Program for English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults With Chronic Pain Delivered Within Shared Medical Visits in a Community Clinic.

Background and objectives: Underserved older adults with chronic pain receive pain treatment predominantly in primary care. However, these clinics often lack resources and access to evidence-based psychosocial pain management. Shared medical visits, in which patients receive care in a group setting, offer a practical avenue for implementing psychosocial pain management. We conducted an open pilot study with exit interviews (NIH stage 1a) assessing the feasibility of GetActive+, an efficacious mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain in a community clinic delivered via shared medical visits.

Research design and methods: Twenty English-speaking and 13 Spanish-speaking older adults with chronic pain from a community primary care clinic participated in GetActive+. Our a priori set primary outcomes were feasibility (≥75% of patients approached agree to participate), acceptability (≥75% of patients enrolled complete 8/10 sessions), and fidelity (≥75% of session components delivered as intended). We also assessed preliminary quantitative outcomes, including multimodal physical function (ActiGraph, PROMIS physical function, 6-minute walk test), pain intensity and interference (Brief Pain Inventory; PEG), and emotional function (depression and anxiety symptoms).

Results: We exceeded our benchmarks for feasibility (86.8%), acceptability (93.9%), and fidelity (97.9%). Participants demonstrated improvement in self-reported physical function and 6-minute walk test, pain intensity and interference, and depressive symptoms but not in ActiGraph step count or anxiety symptoms. Exit interviews supported the quantitative findings.

Discussion and implications: GetActive+ exceeded feasibility benchmarks and offers promise in making psychosocial pain management more accessible in the community via group delivery by any available provider.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信