在特拉华州推行全州避孕措施后发生了什么?

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Constanza Hurtado-Acuna, Michael S Rendall
{"title":"在特拉华州推行全州避孕措施后发生了什么?","authors":"Constanza Hurtado-Acuna, Michael S Rendall","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy Points The 2015 to 2020 Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative followed other long-acting reversible contraception-focused contraceptive initiatives in Colorado and in St. Louis, Missouri. and preceded statewide contraceptive-access initiatives in South Carolina, Massachusetts, and North Carolina with additional initiatives planned. Our principle conclusion is that the DelCAN did not achieve its goal of reducing the fraction of births from unintended pregnancies. However, we find evidence of a substantial magnitude of decrease in unplanned pregnancies that can be attributed to the initiative, and that this decrease occurred entirely among Medicaid-covered women.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>The 2015 to 2020 Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative was motivated by Delaware's having among the highest rates of unintended pregnancies in the United States, of which were either wanted later or unwanted. The expectation of the DelCAN initiative was that by providing greater contraceptive access, especially to long-acting reversible contraception, Delaware's unintended-pregnancy rates could be substantially reduced. In this study, we assess the role of the DelCAN in explaining, for live births, changes in women's pregnancy intentions around the time of conception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examine not only pregnancy intentions, but also the planned status of the pregnancies, including whether the woman was trying to get pregnant and whether she or her partner was using contraception when an unplanned pregnancy occurred. We use the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data with difference-in-difference estimators to compare Delaware with six states in 2007 to 2020 with respect to the planned status of pregnancies ending in births and with 14 states in 2012 to 2020 with respect to the intended status of pregnancies ending in births. Because several components of the DelCAN were designed to facilitate contraceptive access for low-income women, we conduct both an overall analysis and separate analyses for Medicaid-covered and non-Medicaid-covered women.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The DelCAN was not associated with reductions in unintended pregnancies ending in births in Delaware relative to comparison states but was associated with an increase in pregnancies that were wanted sooner. DelCAN was also associated with an increase in planned pregnancies concentrated among Medicaid-insured women and produced through reductions in pregnancies occurring when not using contraception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnancy intentions and pregnancy planning should be treated as distinct concepts in contraceptive-access program design and evaluation. Programs should attend to both pregnancies wanted later and pregnancies wanted sooner to address public health goals in concert with enhancing women's reproductive autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49810,"journal":{"name":"Milbank Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Happened in Delaware Following a Statewide Contraceptive Initiative?\",\"authors\":\"Constanza Hurtado-Acuna, Michael S Rendall\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-0009.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Policy Points The 2015 to 2020 Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative followed other long-acting reversible contraception-focused contraceptive initiatives in Colorado and in St. Louis, Missouri. and preceded statewide contraceptive-access initiatives in South Carolina, Massachusetts, and North Carolina with additional initiatives planned. Our principle conclusion is that the DelCAN did not achieve its goal of reducing the fraction of births from unintended pregnancies. However, we find evidence of a substantial magnitude of decrease in unplanned pregnancies that can be attributed to the initiative, and that this decrease occurred entirely among Medicaid-covered women.</p><p><strong>Context: </strong>The 2015 to 2020 Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative was motivated by Delaware's having among the highest rates of unintended pregnancies in the United States, of which were either wanted later or unwanted. The expectation of the DelCAN initiative was that by providing greater contraceptive access, especially to long-acting reversible contraception, Delaware's unintended-pregnancy rates could be substantially reduced. In this study, we assess the role of the DelCAN in explaining, for live births, changes in women's pregnancy intentions around the time of conception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examine not only pregnancy intentions, but also the planned status of the pregnancies, including whether the woman was trying to get pregnant and whether she or her partner was using contraception when an unplanned pregnancy occurred. We use the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data with difference-in-difference estimators to compare Delaware with six states in 2007 to 2020 with respect to the planned status of pregnancies ending in births and with 14 states in 2012 to 2020 with respect to the intended status of pregnancies ending in births. Because several components of the DelCAN were designed to facilitate contraceptive access for low-income women, we conduct both an overall analysis and separate analyses for Medicaid-covered and non-Medicaid-covered women.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The DelCAN was not associated with reductions in unintended pregnancies ending in births in Delaware relative to comparison states but was associated with an increase in pregnancies that were wanted sooner. DelCAN was also associated with an increase in planned pregnancies concentrated among Medicaid-insured women and produced through reductions in pregnancies occurring when not using contraception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pregnancy intentions and pregnancy planning should be treated as distinct concepts in contraceptive-access program design and evaluation. Programs should attend to both pregnancies wanted later and pregnancies wanted sooner to address public health goals in concert with enhancing women's reproductive autonomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milbank Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milbank Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milbank Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.70008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年至2020年特拉华州避孕措施立即获取(DelCAN)倡议是继科罗拉多州和密苏里州圣路易斯市的其他长效可逆避孕措施之后开展的。在南卡罗来纳、马萨诸塞和北卡罗来纳全州范围内实施避孕措施之前,还计划实施其他措施。我们的主要结论是,DelCAN没有实现其减少意外怀孕分娩比例的目标。然而,我们发现有证据表明,计划外怀孕的大幅减少可以归因于这一举措,而且这种减少完全发生在医疗补助覆盖的妇女中。背景:2015年至2020年特拉华州避孕措施立即获得(DelCAN)倡议的动机是特拉华州是美国意外怀孕率最高的州之一,其中要么是想要的,要么是不想要的。DelCAN倡议的期望是,通过提供更多的避孕手段,特别是长效可逆避孕,特拉华州的意外怀孕率可以大大降低。在这项研究中,我们评估了DelCAN在解释活产的作用,在怀孕期间妇女怀孕意图的变化。方法:我们不仅检查了怀孕意图,还检查了怀孕的计划状态,包括女性是否试图怀孕,以及她或她的伴侣在意外怀孕时是否采取了避孕措施。我们使用妊娠风险评估监测系统数据和差中差估计器,将特拉华州与2007年至2020年6个州的计划终止妊娠状况和2012年至2020年14个州的计划终止妊娠状况进行比较。由于DelCAN的几个组成部分旨在促进低收入妇女获得避孕药具,因此我们对医疗补助覆盖和非医疗补助覆盖的妇女进行了全面分析和单独分析。研究结果:与比较州相比,DelCAN与特拉华州意外怀孕的减少没有关系,但与希望尽早怀孕的增加有关。DelCAN还与计划怀孕的增加有关,计划怀孕集中在医疗补助保险的妇女中,并通过不使用避孕措施的怀孕减少而产生。结论:在避孕方案设计和评价中,妊娠意图和妊娠计划应作为两个不同的概念来对待。计划应该兼顾想要晚怀孕和想要早怀孕,以实现公共卫生目标,同时增强妇女的生殖自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Happened in Delaware Following a Statewide Contraceptive Initiative?

Policy Points The 2015 to 2020 Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative followed other long-acting reversible contraception-focused contraceptive initiatives in Colorado and in St. Louis, Missouri. and preceded statewide contraceptive-access initiatives in South Carolina, Massachusetts, and North Carolina with additional initiatives planned. Our principle conclusion is that the DelCAN did not achieve its goal of reducing the fraction of births from unintended pregnancies. However, we find evidence of a substantial magnitude of decrease in unplanned pregnancies that can be attributed to the initiative, and that this decrease occurred entirely among Medicaid-covered women.

Context: The 2015 to 2020 Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative was motivated by Delaware's having among the highest rates of unintended pregnancies in the United States, of which were either wanted later or unwanted. The expectation of the DelCAN initiative was that by providing greater contraceptive access, especially to long-acting reversible contraception, Delaware's unintended-pregnancy rates could be substantially reduced. In this study, we assess the role of the DelCAN in explaining, for live births, changes in women's pregnancy intentions around the time of conception.

Methods: We examine not only pregnancy intentions, but also the planned status of the pregnancies, including whether the woman was trying to get pregnant and whether she or her partner was using contraception when an unplanned pregnancy occurred. We use the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data with difference-in-difference estimators to compare Delaware with six states in 2007 to 2020 with respect to the planned status of pregnancies ending in births and with 14 states in 2012 to 2020 with respect to the intended status of pregnancies ending in births. Because several components of the DelCAN were designed to facilitate contraceptive access for low-income women, we conduct both an overall analysis and separate analyses for Medicaid-covered and non-Medicaid-covered women.

Findings: The DelCAN was not associated with reductions in unintended pregnancies ending in births in Delaware relative to comparison states but was associated with an increase in pregnancies that were wanted sooner. DelCAN was also associated with an increase in planned pregnancies concentrated among Medicaid-insured women and produced through reductions in pregnancies occurring when not using contraception.

Conclusions: Pregnancy intentions and pregnancy planning should be treated as distinct concepts in contraceptive-access program design and evaluation. Programs should attend to both pregnancies wanted later and pregnancies wanted sooner to address public health goals in concert with enhancing women's reproductive autonomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milbank Quarterly
Milbank Quarterly 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Milbank Quarterly is devoted to scholarly analysis of significant issues in health and health care policy. It presents original research, policy analysis, and commentary from academics, clinicians, and policymakers. The in-depth, multidisciplinary approach of the journal permits contributors to explore fully the social origins of health in our society and to examine in detail the implications of different health policies. Topics addressed in The Milbank Quarterly include the impact of social factors on health, prevention, allocation of health care resources, legal and ethical issues in health policy, health and health care administration, and the organization and financing of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信