专题倦怠:管理患者信息负荷和减少倦怠的人工智能驱动策略。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Stephon N Proctor, Greg Lawton, Shikha Sinha
{"title":"专题倦怠:管理患者信息负荷和减少倦怠的人工智能驱动策略。","authors":"Stephon N Proctor, Greg Lawton, Shikha Sinha","doi":"10.1055/a-2576-0579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of using a large language model (LLM) for generating draft responses to patient messages in the electronic health record (EHR) system on clinicians and support staff workload and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We partnered with Epic Systems to implement OpenAI's ChatGPT 4.0 for responding to patient messages. A pilot study was conducted from August 2023 to July 2024 across 13 ambulatory specialties involving 323 participants, including clinicians and support staff. Data on draft utilization rates and message response times were collected and analyzed using statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean generated draft utilization rate was 38%, with significant differences by role and specialty. Clinicians had a higher utilization rate (43%) than scheduling staff (33%). Draft message usage significantly reduced all users' message response time (13 seconds on average). Support staff experienced a more substantial and statistically significant time saving (23 seconds) compared to negligible time savings seen by clinicians (3 seconds). Variability in utilization rates and time savings was observed across different specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing LLMs for drafting patient message replies can reduce response times and alleviate message burden. However, the effectiveness of AI-generated draft responses varies by clinical role and specialty, indicating the need for tailored implementations. Further development and personalization of AI (Artificial Intelligence) tools are recommended to maximize their utility and ensure safe and effective use in diverse clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Topic Burnout: An AI-Powered Strategy for Managing Patient Messaging Load and Reducing Burnout.\",\"authors\":\"Stephon N Proctor, Greg Lawton, Shikha Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2576-0579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of using a large language model (LLM) for generating draft responses to patient messages in the electronic health record (EHR) system on clinicians and support staff workload and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We partnered with Epic Systems to implement OpenAI's ChatGPT 4.0 for responding to patient messages. A pilot study was conducted from August 2023 to July 2024 across 13 ambulatory specialties involving 323 participants, including clinicians and support staff. Data on draft utilization rates and message response times were collected and analyzed using statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean generated draft utilization rate was 38%, with significant differences by role and specialty. Clinicians had a higher utilization rate (43%) than scheduling staff (33%). Draft message usage significantly reduced all users' message response time (13 seconds on average). Support staff experienced a more substantial and statistically significant time saving (23 seconds) compared to negligible time savings seen by clinicians (3 seconds). Variability in utilization rates and time savings was observed across different specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing LLMs for drafting patient message replies can reduce response times and alleviate message burden. However, the effectiveness of AI-generated draft responses varies by clinical role and specialty, indicating the need for tailored implementations. Further development and personalization of AI (Artificial Intelligence) tools are recommended to maximize their utility and ensure safe and effective use in diverse clinical contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-0579\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-0579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估使用大型语言模型(LLM)在电子健康记录(EHR)系统中生成患者信息回复草稿对临床医生和支持人员工作量和效率的影响。方法:我们与Epic Systems合作,实施OpenAI的ChatGPT 4.0来响应患者信息。一项试点研究于2023年8月至2024年7月在13个门诊专科进行,涉及323名参与者,包括临床医生和支持人员。使用统计方法收集和分析草稿利用率和消息响应时间的数据。结果:总体平均生成草稿利用率为38%,角色和专业之间存在显著差异。临床医生的使用率(43%)高于调度人员(33%)。草稿消息的使用显著减少了所有用户的消息响应时间(平均为13秒)。与临床医生(3秒)相比,支持人员节省的时间(23秒)更大,在统计上也更显著。在不同的专业中观察到利用率和时间节约的差异。结论:在患者信息回复中实施llm可以减少响应时间,减轻信息负担。然而,人工智能生成的草案响应的有效性因临床角色和专业而异,这表明需要量身定制的实施。建议进一步开发和个性化AI(人工智能)工具,以最大限度地发挥其效用,并确保在各种临床环境中安全有效地使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special Topic Burnout: An AI-Powered Strategy for Managing Patient Messaging Load and Reducing Burnout.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of using a large language model (LLM) for generating draft responses to patient messages in the electronic health record (EHR) system on clinicians and support staff workload and efficiency.

Methods: We partnered with Epic Systems to implement OpenAI's ChatGPT 4.0 for responding to patient messages. A pilot study was conducted from August 2023 to July 2024 across 13 ambulatory specialties involving 323 participants, including clinicians and support staff. Data on draft utilization rates and message response times were collected and analyzed using statistical methods.

Results: The overall mean generated draft utilization rate was 38%, with significant differences by role and specialty. Clinicians had a higher utilization rate (43%) than scheduling staff (33%). Draft message usage significantly reduced all users' message response time (13 seconds on average). Support staff experienced a more substantial and statistically significant time saving (23 seconds) compared to negligible time savings seen by clinicians (3 seconds). Variability in utilization rates and time savings was observed across different specialties.

Conclusion: Implementing LLMs for drafting patient message replies can reduce response times and alleviate message burden. However, the effectiveness of AI-generated draft responses varies by clinical role and specialty, indicating the need for tailored implementations. Further development and personalization of AI (Artificial Intelligence) tools are recommended to maximize their utility and ensure safe and effective use in diverse clinical contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信