高危糖尿病患者在COVID-19临床减速前后的门诊用药安全事件

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Richard A Young, Somer Blair, Kari Teigen, David Li, Kimberly G Fulda, Anna Espinoza, Ayse P Gurses, Samantha I Pitts, Zachary N Hendrix, Yan Xiao
{"title":"高危糖尿病患者在COVID-19临床减速前后的门诊用药安全事件","authors":"Richard A Young, Somer Blair, Kari Teigen, David Li, Kimberly G Fulda, Anna Espinoza, Ayse P Gurses, Samantha I Pitts, Zachary N Hendrix, Yan Xiao","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess possible changes in medication safety over a mandatory pre-/post- COVID-19 clinic slowdown in a high-risk population of patients with diabetes seen at a safety net clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of all patient encounters 1 year before and after the slowdown. The study cohort were all patients with poorly controlled diabetes established pre-COVID-19 who were prescribed 4+ chronic medications. Each clinic note was abstracted for reports of any medication-related problems. The primary outcomes were measures of health care system utilization and potential adverse drug events (ADEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 762 patients with diabetes, 59 were poorly controlled and formed the high-risk study cohort: age 53.0±11 years, 69% female, 17% White, 29% Hispanic, and 43% African American. There were similar numbers of patient encounters pre-/post-slowdown (7.68 clinic visits vs. 4.2 clinic visits plus 3.19 telehealth visits), cancellations (2.54 vs. 2.97), and no-shows (2.17 vs. 1.98). There was no change in the number of prescribed medications pre-/post-slowdown (12.1 vs. 11.7), but more potential adverse medication events (6/380 (1.6%) vs. 17/429 (4.0%), P=0.04). Of all abstracted medication-related problems, the majority were in diabetic medications 57/78 (73.1%), and of those, most involved insulin 43/57 (75.4%). Eleven preventable ADEs over the 2-year period were observed, all involved insulin, and were often affected by patient work system challenges such as self-administration and timing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a small increase in potential adverse medication events among a cohort of high-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common ADE was hypoglycemia associated with insulin.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory Medication Safety Events in High-risk Patients With Diabetes Before and After a COVID-19 Clinic Slowdown.\",\"authors\":\"Richard A Young, Somer Blair, Kari Teigen, David Li, Kimberly G Fulda, Anna Espinoza, Ayse P Gurses, Samantha I Pitts, Zachary N Hendrix, Yan Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess possible changes in medication safety over a mandatory pre-/post- COVID-19 clinic slowdown in a high-risk population of patients with diabetes seen at a safety net clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of all patient encounters 1 year before and after the slowdown. The study cohort were all patients with poorly controlled diabetes established pre-COVID-19 who were prescribed 4+ chronic medications. Each clinic note was abstracted for reports of any medication-related problems. The primary outcomes were measures of health care system utilization and potential adverse drug events (ADEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 762 patients with diabetes, 59 were poorly controlled and formed the high-risk study cohort: age 53.0±11 years, 69% female, 17% White, 29% Hispanic, and 43% African American. There were similar numbers of patient encounters pre-/post-slowdown (7.68 clinic visits vs. 4.2 clinic visits plus 3.19 telehealth visits), cancellations (2.54 vs. 2.97), and no-shows (2.17 vs. 1.98). There was no change in the number of prescribed medications pre-/post-slowdown (12.1 vs. 11.7), but more potential adverse medication events (6/380 (1.6%) vs. 17/429 (4.0%), P=0.04). Of all abstracted medication-related problems, the majority were in diabetic medications 57/78 (73.1%), and of those, most involved insulin 43/57 (75.4%). Eleven preventable ADEs over the 2-year period were observed, all involved insulin, and were often affected by patient work system challenges such as self-administration and timing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a small increase in potential adverse medication events among a cohort of high-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common ADE was hypoglycemia associated with insulin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001352\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在评估在安全网诊所就诊的高风险糖尿病患者在COVID-19前/后强制性临床减速后药物安全性可能发生的变化。方法:回顾性分析所有患者减速前后1年的病历。该研究队列是所有在covid -19前确诊的糖尿病控制不佳的患者,他们服用了4种以上的慢性药物。每份临床记录都摘录了与任何药物相关问题的报告。主要结局是卫生保健系统利用率和潜在药物不良事件(ADEs)的测量。结果:762例糖尿病患者中,59例控制不良,构成高危研究队列:年龄53.0±11岁,女性69%,白人17%,西班牙裔29%,非裔43%。患者就诊前后的就诊次数相似(7.68次诊所就诊对4.2次诊所就诊加上3.19次远程医疗就诊)、取消就诊(2.54次对2.97次)和未就诊(2.17次对1.98次)。减缓前后的处方药物数量没有变化(12.1比11.7),但潜在的不良药物事件更多(6/380(1.6%)比17/429 (4.0%),P=0.04)。在所有被抽象化的药物相关问题中,以糖尿病药物57/78(73.1%)居多,其中以胰岛素43/57(75.4%)居多。在2年期间观察到11例可预防的ade,均与胰岛素有关,并且经常受到患者工作系统挑战(如自我给药和时间安排)的影响。结论:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,高危患者队列中潜在的药物不良事件略有增加。最常见的ADE是与胰岛素相关的低血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ambulatory Medication Safety Events in High-risk Patients With Diabetes Before and After a COVID-19 Clinic Slowdown.

Objectives: We aimed to assess possible changes in medication safety over a mandatory pre-/post- COVID-19 clinic slowdown in a high-risk population of patients with diabetes seen at a safety net clinic.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patient encounters 1 year before and after the slowdown. The study cohort were all patients with poorly controlled diabetes established pre-COVID-19 who were prescribed 4+ chronic medications. Each clinic note was abstracted for reports of any medication-related problems. The primary outcomes were measures of health care system utilization and potential adverse drug events (ADEs).

Results: Out of 762 patients with diabetes, 59 were poorly controlled and formed the high-risk study cohort: age 53.0±11 years, 69% female, 17% White, 29% Hispanic, and 43% African American. There were similar numbers of patient encounters pre-/post-slowdown (7.68 clinic visits vs. 4.2 clinic visits plus 3.19 telehealth visits), cancellations (2.54 vs. 2.97), and no-shows (2.17 vs. 1.98). There was no change in the number of prescribed medications pre-/post-slowdown (12.1 vs. 11.7), but more potential adverse medication events (6/380 (1.6%) vs. 17/429 (4.0%), P=0.04). Of all abstracted medication-related problems, the majority were in diabetic medications 57/78 (73.1%), and of those, most involved insulin 43/57 (75.4%). Eleven preventable ADEs over the 2-year period were observed, all involved insulin, and were often affected by patient work system challenges such as self-administration and timing.

Conclusions: There was a small increase in potential adverse medication events among a cohort of high-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common ADE was hypoglycemia associated with insulin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信