Richard A Young, Somer Blair, Kari Teigen, David Li, Kimberly G Fulda, Anna Espinoza, Ayse P Gurses, Samantha I Pitts, Zachary N Hendrix, Yan Xiao
{"title":"高危糖尿病患者在COVID-19临床减速前后的门诊用药安全事件","authors":"Richard A Young, Somer Blair, Kari Teigen, David Li, Kimberly G Fulda, Anna Espinoza, Ayse P Gurses, Samantha I Pitts, Zachary N Hendrix, Yan Xiao","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess possible changes in medication safety over a mandatory pre-/post- COVID-19 clinic slowdown in a high-risk population of patients with diabetes seen at a safety net clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of all patient encounters 1 year before and after the slowdown. The study cohort were all patients with poorly controlled diabetes established pre-COVID-19 who were prescribed 4+ chronic medications. Each clinic note was abstracted for reports of any medication-related problems. The primary outcomes were measures of health care system utilization and potential adverse drug events (ADEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 762 patients with diabetes, 59 were poorly controlled and formed the high-risk study cohort: age 53.0±11 years, 69% female, 17% White, 29% Hispanic, and 43% African American. There were similar numbers of patient encounters pre-/post-slowdown (7.68 clinic visits vs. 4.2 clinic visits plus 3.19 telehealth visits), cancellations (2.54 vs. 2.97), and no-shows (2.17 vs. 1.98). There was no change in the number of prescribed medications pre-/post-slowdown (12.1 vs. 11.7), but more potential adverse medication events (6/380 (1.6%) vs. 17/429 (4.0%), P=0.04). Of all abstracted medication-related problems, the majority were in diabetic medications 57/78 (73.1%), and of those, most involved insulin 43/57 (75.4%). Eleven preventable ADEs over the 2-year period were observed, all involved insulin, and were often affected by patient work system challenges such as self-administration and timing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a small increase in potential adverse medication events among a cohort of high-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common ADE was hypoglycemia associated with insulin.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory Medication Safety Events in High-risk Patients With Diabetes Before and After a COVID-19 Clinic Slowdown.\",\"authors\":\"Richard A Young, Somer Blair, Kari Teigen, David Li, Kimberly G Fulda, Anna Espinoza, Ayse P Gurses, Samantha I Pitts, Zachary N Hendrix, Yan Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess possible changes in medication safety over a mandatory pre-/post- COVID-19 clinic slowdown in a high-risk population of patients with diabetes seen at a safety net clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of all patient encounters 1 year before and after the slowdown. The study cohort were all patients with poorly controlled diabetes established pre-COVID-19 who were prescribed 4+ chronic medications. Each clinic note was abstracted for reports of any medication-related problems. The primary outcomes were measures of health care system utilization and potential adverse drug events (ADEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 762 patients with diabetes, 59 were poorly controlled and formed the high-risk study cohort: age 53.0±11 years, 69% female, 17% White, 29% Hispanic, and 43% African American. There were similar numbers of patient encounters pre-/post-slowdown (7.68 clinic visits vs. 4.2 clinic visits plus 3.19 telehealth visits), cancellations (2.54 vs. 2.97), and no-shows (2.17 vs. 1.98). There was no change in the number of prescribed medications pre-/post-slowdown (12.1 vs. 11.7), but more potential adverse medication events (6/380 (1.6%) vs. 17/429 (4.0%), P=0.04). Of all abstracted medication-related problems, the majority were in diabetic medications 57/78 (73.1%), and of those, most involved insulin 43/57 (75.4%). Eleven preventable ADEs over the 2-year period were observed, all involved insulin, and were often affected by patient work system challenges such as self-administration and timing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a small increase in potential adverse medication events among a cohort of high-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common ADE was hypoglycemia associated with insulin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001352\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ambulatory Medication Safety Events in High-risk Patients With Diabetes Before and After a COVID-19 Clinic Slowdown.
Objectives: We aimed to assess possible changes in medication safety over a mandatory pre-/post- COVID-19 clinic slowdown in a high-risk population of patients with diabetes seen at a safety net clinic.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patient encounters 1 year before and after the slowdown. The study cohort were all patients with poorly controlled diabetes established pre-COVID-19 who were prescribed 4+ chronic medications. Each clinic note was abstracted for reports of any medication-related problems. The primary outcomes were measures of health care system utilization and potential adverse drug events (ADEs).
Results: Out of 762 patients with diabetes, 59 were poorly controlled and formed the high-risk study cohort: age 53.0±11 years, 69% female, 17% White, 29% Hispanic, and 43% African American. There were similar numbers of patient encounters pre-/post-slowdown (7.68 clinic visits vs. 4.2 clinic visits plus 3.19 telehealth visits), cancellations (2.54 vs. 2.97), and no-shows (2.17 vs. 1.98). There was no change in the number of prescribed medications pre-/post-slowdown (12.1 vs. 11.7), but more potential adverse medication events (6/380 (1.6%) vs. 17/429 (4.0%), P=0.04). Of all abstracted medication-related problems, the majority were in diabetic medications 57/78 (73.1%), and of those, most involved insulin 43/57 (75.4%). Eleven preventable ADEs over the 2-year period were observed, all involved insulin, and were often affected by patient work system challenges such as self-administration and timing.
Conclusions: There was a small increase in potential adverse medication events among a cohort of high-risk patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common ADE was hypoglycemia associated with insulin.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.