{"title":"创建健全的患者群体以研究电子健康记录的不同条件的策略。","authors":"Grace D Ramey, Hannah Takasuka, John A Capra","doi":"10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-114525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The growth of electronic health record (EHR) databases in size and availability has created an unprecedented opportunity to better understand human health and disease. However, conducting robust EHR studies requires careful filtering criteria and study design, as EHRs pose several challenges that can confound analyses and lead to inaccurate results. Here we review these challenges and make suggestions about how to avoid or adjust for major confounders and biases in common EHR study designs. We further highlight qualities of EHR data that make different diseases more or less feasible for study. These recommendations for conducting research using EHRs will help inform database selection, improve reproducibility of results across the field, and enhance the validity of study results.</p>","PeriodicalId":29775,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Creating Robust Patient Groups to Study Diverse Conditions with Electronic Health Records.\",\"authors\":\"Grace D Ramey, Hannah Takasuka, John A Capra\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-114525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The growth of electronic health record (EHR) databases in size and availability has created an unprecedented opportunity to better understand human health and disease. However, conducting robust EHR studies requires careful filtering criteria and study design, as EHRs pose several challenges that can confound analyses and lead to inaccurate results. Here we review these challenges and make suggestions about how to avoid or adjust for major confounders and biases in common EHR study designs. We further highlight qualities of EHR data that make different diseases more or less feasible for study. These recommendations for conducting research using EHRs will help inform database selection, improve reproducibility of results across the field, and enhance the validity of study results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-114525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-020722-114525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strategies for Creating Robust Patient Groups to Study Diverse Conditions with Electronic Health Records.
The growth of electronic health record (EHR) databases in size and availability has created an unprecedented opportunity to better understand human health and disease. However, conducting robust EHR studies requires careful filtering criteria and study design, as EHRs pose several challenges that can confound analyses and lead to inaccurate results. Here we review these challenges and make suggestions about how to avoid or adjust for major confounders and biases in common EHR study designs. We further highlight qualities of EHR data that make different diseases more or less feasible for study. These recommendations for conducting research using EHRs will help inform database selection, improve reproducibility of results across the field, and enhance the validity of study results.
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science provides comprehensive expert reviews in biomedical data science, focusing on advanced methods to store, retrieve, analyze, and organize biomedical data and knowledge. The scope of the journal encompasses informatics, computational, artificial intelligence (AI), and statistical approaches to biomedical data, including the sub-fields of bioinformatics, computational biology, biomedical informatics, clinical and clinical research informatics, biostatistics, and imaging informatics. The mission of the journal is to identify both emerging and established areas of biomedical data science, and the leaders in these fields.