重新审视技术偏见缓解战略。

IF 7 Q1 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Artem A Trotsyuk
{"title":"重新审视技术偏见缓解战略。","authors":"Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Artem A Trotsyuk","doi":"10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-095737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efforts to mitigate bias and enhance fairness in the artificial intelligence (AI) community have predominantly focused on technical solutions. While numerous reviews have addressed bias in AI, this review uniquely focuses on the practical limitations of technical solutions in healthcare settings, providing a structured analysis across five key dimensions affecting their real-world implementation: who defines bias and fairness, which mitigation strategy to use and prioritize among dozens that are inconsistent and incompatible, when in the AI development stages the solutions are most effective, for which populations, and the context for which the solutions are designed. We illustrate each limitation with empirical studies focusing on healthcare and biomedical applications. Moreover, we discuss how value-sensitive AI, a framework derived from technology design, can engage stakeholders and ensure that their values are embodied in bias and fairness mitigation solutions. Finally, we discuss areas that require further investigation and provide practical recommendations to address the limitations covered in the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":29775,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Technical Bias Mitigation Strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Artem A Trotsyuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-095737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Efforts to mitigate bias and enhance fairness in the artificial intelligence (AI) community have predominantly focused on technical solutions. While numerous reviews have addressed bias in AI, this review uniquely focuses on the practical limitations of technical solutions in healthcare settings, providing a structured analysis across five key dimensions affecting their real-world implementation: who defines bias and fairness, which mitigation strategy to use and prioritize among dozens that are inconsistent and incompatible, when in the AI development stages the solutions are most effective, for which populations, and the context for which the solutions are designed. We illustrate each limitation with empirical studies focusing on healthcare and biomedical applications. Moreover, we discuss how value-sensitive AI, a framework derived from technology design, can engage stakeholders and ensure that their values are embodied in bias and fairness mitigation solutions. Finally, we discuss areas that require further investigation and provide practical recommendations to address the limitations covered in the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-095737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-103123-095737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人工智能(AI)社区,减轻偏见和提高公平性的努力主要集中在技术解决方案上。虽然许多综述已经解决了人工智能中的偏见,但本综述独特地关注了医疗保健环境中技术解决方案的实际局限性,并在影响其现实世界实施的五个关键维度上提供了结构化分析:世卫组织定义了偏见和公平,在数十种不一致和不相容的缓解策略中使用哪种策略并优先考虑哪种策略,在人工智能开发阶段,解决方案何时最有效,针对哪些人群,以及设计解决方案的背景。我们通过关注医疗保健和生物医学应用的实证研究来说明每个限制。此外,我们还讨论了价值敏感的人工智能(源自技术设计的框架)如何吸引利益相关者,并确保他们的价值观体现在偏见和公平缓解解决方案中。最后,我们讨论了需要进一步调查的领域,并提供了实际的建议,以解决研究中所涵盖的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting Technical Bias Mitigation Strategies.

Efforts to mitigate bias and enhance fairness in the artificial intelligence (AI) community have predominantly focused on technical solutions. While numerous reviews have addressed bias in AI, this review uniquely focuses on the practical limitations of technical solutions in healthcare settings, providing a structured analysis across five key dimensions affecting their real-world implementation: who defines bias and fairness, which mitigation strategy to use and prioritize among dozens that are inconsistent and incompatible, when in the AI development stages the solutions are most effective, for which populations, and the context for which the solutions are designed. We illustrate each limitation with empirical studies focusing on healthcare and biomedical applications. Moreover, we discuss how value-sensitive AI, a framework derived from technology design, can engage stakeholders and ensure that their values are embodied in bias and fairness mitigation solutions. Finally, we discuss areas that require further investigation and provide practical recommendations to address the limitations covered in the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science provides comprehensive expert reviews in biomedical data science, focusing on advanced methods to store, retrieve, analyze, and organize biomedical data and knowledge. The scope of the journal encompasses informatics, computational, artificial intelligence (AI), and statistical approaches to biomedical data, including the sub-fields of bioinformatics, computational biology, biomedical informatics, clinical and clinical research informatics, biostatistics, and imaging informatics. The mission of the journal is to identify both emerging and established areas of biomedical data science, and the leaders in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信