眶内缝合技术与中断角膜缝合技术、松散缝合和角膜结暴露的比较研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1177/15533506251328456
Kaan Ozkan, Bahri Aydın, Ahmet Yucel Ucgul, Kemal Bayrakceken, Mehmet Cuneyt Ozmen, Rustu Fikret Akata
{"title":"眶内缝合技术与中断角膜缝合技术、松散缝合和角膜结暴露的比较研究。","authors":"Kaan Ozkan, Bahri Aydın, Ahmet Yucel Ucgul, Kemal Bayrakceken, Mehmet Cuneyt Ozmen, Rustu Fikret Akata","doi":"10.1177/15533506251328456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an innovative intrastromal suturing technique in an experimental rabbit model, comparing it to standard interrupted suturing, loose suture, and suturing with knot exposure.MethodsFourteen adult male New Zealand White rabbits were included in this study. Each rabbit underwent suturing in both eyes, divided into four groups based on suturing techniques. The novel intrastromal suturing technique involved burying the entire suture material within the corneal stroma. Corneal neovascularisation (CoNV) areas were evaluated by image analysis and immune cell densities by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).ResultsThe intrastromal suturing group demonstrated significantly smaller CoNV areas at both 1 week and 1 month post-suturing compared to other interventional groups, indicating effective mitigation of CoNV development and progression. Moreover, this group exhibited lower immune cell densities in the superficial stromal layer and endothelial layer, suggesting a reduced inflammatory response. Both the loose suture and the knot exposure groups exhibited significant levels of CoNV and heightened immune cell densities.ConclusionThis experimental study demonstrated effectiveness of intrastromal suturing technique in limiting CoNV and immune cell infiltration, common contributors to graft rejection and complications. Furthermore, the study revealed that loose sutures and those with exposed knots are likely to cause more severe CoNV and inflammation, compared to the traditional interrupted suturing technique and intrastromal suturing.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"325-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrastromal Suturing Technique Compared With Interrupted Corneal Suturing Technique, Loose Suture and Knot Exposure: A Comparative Rabbit Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kaan Ozkan, Bahri Aydın, Ahmet Yucel Ucgul, Kemal Bayrakceken, Mehmet Cuneyt Ozmen, Rustu Fikret Akata\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15533506251328456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an innovative intrastromal suturing technique in an experimental rabbit model, comparing it to standard interrupted suturing, loose suture, and suturing with knot exposure.MethodsFourteen adult male New Zealand White rabbits were included in this study. Each rabbit underwent suturing in both eyes, divided into four groups based on suturing techniques. The novel intrastromal suturing technique involved burying the entire suture material within the corneal stroma. Corneal neovascularisation (CoNV) areas were evaluated by image analysis and immune cell densities by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).ResultsThe intrastromal suturing group demonstrated significantly smaller CoNV areas at both 1 week and 1 month post-suturing compared to other interventional groups, indicating effective mitigation of CoNV development and progression. Moreover, this group exhibited lower immune cell densities in the superficial stromal layer and endothelial layer, suggesting a reduced inflammatory response. Both the loose suture and the knot exposure groups exhibited significant levels of CoNV and heightened immune cell densities.ConclusionThis experimental study demonstrated effectiveness of intrastromal suturing technique in limiting CoNV and immune cell infiltration, common contributors to graft rejection and complications. Furthermore, the study revealed that loose sutures and those with exposed knots are likely to cause more severe CoNV and inflammation, compared to the traditional interrupted suturing technique and intrastromal suturing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"325-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251328456\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251328456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估一种创新的眶内缝合技术在实验兔模型上的有效性,并将其与标准的间断缝合、松散缝合和结暴露缝合进行比较。方法选择成年雄性新西兰大白兔14只。每只兔双眼缝合,根据缝合技术分为四组。这种新颖的角膜间质缝合技术涉及将整个缝合线材料埋入角膜间质。通过图像分析和体内共聚焦显微镜(IVCM)免疫细胞密度评估角膜新生血管(CoNV)区域。结果与其他干预组相比,术中缝合组在缝合后1周和1个月的CoNV面积均明显缩小,表明有效缓解了CoNV的发生和进展。此外,该组在浅表间质层和内皮层表现出较低的免疫细胞密度,表明炎症反应减少。松散缝线组和结暴露组均表现出显著水平的CoNV和免疫细胞密度升高。结论真皮内缝合技术可有效地抑制CoNV和免疫细胞浸润,这是导致移植排斥反应和并发症的常见原因。此外,研究显示,与传统的间断缝合技术和间质内缝合相比,松散的缝线和暴露的结可能导致更严重的CoNV和炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intrastromal Suturing Technique Compared With Interrupted Corneal Suturing Technique, Loose Suture and Knot Exposure: A Comparative Rabbit Study.

PurposeThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an innovative intrastromal suturing technique in an experimental rabbit model, comparing it to standard interrupted suturing, loose suture, and suturing with knot exposure.MethodsFourteen adult male New Zealand White rabbits were included in this study. Each rabbit underwent suturing in both eyes, divided into four groups based on suturing techniques. The novel intrastromal suturing technique involved burying the entire suture material within the corneal stroma. Corneal neovascularisation (CoNV) areas were evaluated by image analysis and immune cell densities by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).ResultsThe intrastromal suturing group demonstrated significantly smaller CoNV areas at both 1 week and 1 month post-suturing compared to other interventional groups, indicating effective mitigation of CoNV development and progression. Moreover, this group exhibited lower immune cell densities in the superficial stromal layer and endothelial layer, suggesting a reduced inflammatory response. Both the loose suture and the knot exposure groups exhibited significant levels of CoNV and heightened immune cell densities.ConclusionThis experimental study demonstrated effectiveness of intrastromal suturing technique in limiting CoNV and immune cell infiltration, common contributors to graft rejection and complications. Furthermore, the study revealed that loose sutures and those with exposed knots are likely to cause more severe CoNV and inflammation, compared to the traditional interrupted suturing technique and intrastromal suturing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信