在应用健康人工智能中寻找价值敏感设计:叙述回顾。

Yearbook of medical informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1800723
Yufei Long, Laurie Novak, Colin G Walsh
{"title":"在应用健康人工智能中寻找价值敏感设计:叙述回顾。","authors":"Yufei Long, Laurie Novak, Colin G Walsh","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1800723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent advances in the implementation of healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) have drawn attention toward design methods to address the impacts on workflow. Lesser known than human-centered design, Value Sensitive Design (VSD) is an established framework integrating values into conceptual, technical, and empirical investigations of technology. We sought to study the current state of the literature intersecting elements of VSD with practical applications of healthcare AI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a modified VSD framework attentive to AI-specific values, we conducted a narrative review informed by PRISMA guidelines and assessed VSD elements across design and implementation case studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search produced 819 articles that went through multiple rounds of review. Nine studies qualified for full-text review. Most of the studies focused on values for the individual or professional practice such as trust and autonomy. Attention to organizational (e.g., stewardship, employee well-being) and societal (e.g., equity, justice) values was lacking. Studies were primarily from the U.S. and Western Europe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future design studies might better incorporate components of VSD by considering larger domains, organizational and societal, in value identification and to bridge to design processes that are not just human-centered but value sensitive. The small number of heterogeneous studies underlines the importance of broader studies of elements of VSD to inform healthcare AI in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":"75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Searching for Value Sensitive Design in Applied Health AI: A Narrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Yufei Long, Laurie Novak, Colin G Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1800723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent advances in the implementation of healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) have drawn attention toward design methods to address the impacts on workflow. Lesser known than human-centered design, Value Sensitive Design (VSD) is an established framework integrating values into conceptual, technical, and empirical investigations of technology. We sought to study the current state of the literature intersecting elements of VSD with practical applications of healthcare AI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a modified VSD framework attentive to AI-specific values, we conducted a narrative review informed by PRISMA guidelines and assessed VSD elements across design and implementation case studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search produced 819 articles that went through multiple rounds of review. Nine studies qualified for full-text review. Most of the studies focused on values for the individual or professional practice such as trust and autonomy. Attention to organizational (e.g., stewardship, employee well-being) and societal (e.g., equity, justice) values was lacking. Studies were primarily from the U.S. and Western Europe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future design studies might better incorporate components of VSD by considering larger domains, organizational and societal, in value identification and to bridge to design processes that are not just human-centered but value sensitive. The small number of heterogeneous studies underlines the importance of broader studies of elements of VSD to inform healthcare AI in practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of medical informatics\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"75-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020519/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of medical informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800723\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医疗人工智能(AI)实施的最新进展引起了人们对设计方法的关注,以解决对工作流程的影响。与以人为中心的设计相比,价值敏感设计(VSD)鲜为人知,它是一个已建立的框架,将价值整合到技术的概念、技术和实证研究中。我们试图研究交叉VSD元素与医疗人工智能实际应用的文献现状。方法:使用关注ai特定价值的改进VSD框架,我们根据PRISMA指南进行了叙述性回顾,并评估了设计和实施案例研究中的VSD元素。结果:我们的搜索产生了819篇经过多轮评审的文章。9项研究符合全文综述的条件。大多数研究集中在个人或专业实践的价值观,如信任和自主。缺乏对组织(例如,管理、员工福利)和社会(例如,公平、正义)价值观的关注。研究主要来自美国和西欧。结论:未来的设计研究可能会更好地结合VSD的组成部分,通过考虑更大的领域,组织和社会,在价值识别和桥梁设计过程中,不仅以人为中心,而且价值敏感。少数异质性研究强调了对VSD要素进行更广泛研究的重要性,以便为实践中的医疗人工智能提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Searching for Value Sensitive Design in Applied Health AI: A Narrative Review.

Objective: Recent advances in the implementation of healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) have drawn attention toward design methods to address the impacts on workflow. Lesser known than human-centered design, Value Sensitive Design (VSD) is an established framework integrating values into conceptual, technical, and empirical investigations of technology. We sought to study the current state of the literature intersecting elements of VSD with practical applications of healthcare AI.

Methods: Using a modified VSD framework attentive to AI-specific values, we conducted a narrative review informed by PRISMA guidelines and assessed VSD elements across design and implementation case studies.

Results: Our search produced 819 articles that went through multiple rounds of review. Nine studies qualified for full-text review. Most of the studies focused on values for the individual or professional practice such as trust and autonomy. Attention to organizational (e.g., stewardship, employee well-being) and societal (e.g., equity, justice) values was lacking. Studies were primarily from the U.S. and Western Europe.

Conclusion: Future design studies might better incorporate components of VSD by considering larger domains, organizational and societal, in value identification and to bridge to design processes that are not just human-centered but value sensitive. The small number of heterogeneous studies underlines the importance of broader studies of elements of VSD to inform healthcare AI in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信