CAMP 阴性的无乳链球菌菌株表现出 CAMP 因子编码基因 cfb 的染色体完全或部分缺失。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2025-05-06 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.03257-24
Xixi Lai, Meihong Chen, Jianwei Wang, Junjun Wang, Hui Lv, Haihua Xie, Wenjuan He, Dongjie Chen, Yi Huang, Pengwei Cai, Lilan Zheng
{"title":"CAMP 阴性的无乳链球菌菌株表现出 CAMP 因子编码基因 cfb 的染色体完全或部分缺失。","authors":"Xixi Lai, Meihong Chen, Jianwei Wang, Junjun Wang, Hui Lv, Haihua Xie, Wenjuan He, Dongjie Chen, Yi Huang, Pengwei Cai, Lilan Zheng","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.03257-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Universal antepartum group B streptococcus (GBS) screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) have effectively reduced early-onset GBS infections. However, GBS strains with chromosomal deletions affecting the <i>cfb</i> gene may produce false negatives in both the CAMP test and <i>cfb</i>-based molecular diagnostics, potentially increasing the risk of neonatal infections. Vaginal swabs were collected from pregnant women at 35-37 weeks of gestation in our hospital and cultured on agar. Suspected GBS strains were initially identified using the CAMP test and then confirmed with the VITEK-2 system. CAMP-negative GBS strains underwent additional testing by qPCR, 16S rDNA, serotyping, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). PCR for the <i>cfb</i> gene and whole-genome sequencing were performed on CAMP-negative strains. From 5,794 samples, 526 (9.1%) GBS strains, including 19 (3.6%) CAMP-negative strains and 2 strains from the same patient, were isolated. All 19 CAMP-negative strains were serotypes III and ST862. Among these strains, only one strain was <i>cfb</i> positive by qPCR, whereas all tested positive with a multitarget qPCR kit for <i>cfb</i> and <i>cps</i>. PCR amplification upstream of the <i>cfb</i> gene produced a specific band in strain PP669713 only, suggesting N-terminal <i>cfb</i> gene retention in PP669713 and complete <i>cfb</i> loss in the other strains. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed a chromosomal deletion in PP669713. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed no resistance to penicillin. However, CAMP-positive strains presented a greater prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin than CAMP-negative strains did. Our study highlights the potential risk of missed GBS detection using CAMP tests and <i>cfb</i>-targeted molecular assays.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Our work makes several novel contributions to the field. (i) We report the first documented case of a C-terminal deletion of the <i>cfb</i> gene in a CAMP-negative GBS strain, demonstrating that both N-terminal and C-terminal regions are essential for cohemolytic activity. (ii) Our findings reveal that CAMP-negative GBS strains (3.6% of isolates) are more prevalent than previously recognized, with most cases resulting from complete chromosomal deletions of the <i>cfb</i> gene. (iii) We provide evidence that single-target molecular assays targeting only the <i>cfb</i> gene may miss GBS detection, highlighting the necessity for multi-target approaches in clinical diagnostics. (iv) We demonstrate a unique antibiotic resistance pattern in CAMP-negative strains, showing significantly lower resistance to certain antibiotics compared to CAMP-positive strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0325724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CAMP-negative <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i> strains exhibited complete or partial chromosomal deletions of the CAMP-factor encoding gene <i>cfb</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Xixi Lai, Meihong Chen, Jianwei Wang, Junjun Wang, Hui Lv, Haihua Xie, Wenjuan He, Dongjie Chen, Yi Huang, Pengwei Cai, Lilan Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.03257-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Universal antepartum group B streptococcus (GBS) screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) have effectively reduced early-onset GBS infections. However, GBS strains with chromosomal deletions affecting the <i>cfb</i> gene may produce false negatives in both the CAMP test and <i>cfb</i>-based molecular diagnostics, potentially increasing the risk of neonatal infections. Vaginal swabs were collected from pregnant women at 35-37 weeks of gestation in our hospital and cultured on agar. Suspected GBS strains were initially identified using the CAMP test and then confirmed with the VITEK-2 system. CAMP-negative GBS strains underwent additional testing by qPCR, 16S rDNA, serotyping, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). PCR for the <i>cfb</i> gene and whole-genome sequencing were performed on CAMP-negative strains. From 5,794 samples, 526 (9.1%) GBS strains, including 19 (3.6%) CAMP-negative strains and 2 strains from the same patient, were isolated. All 19 CAMP-negative strains were serotypes III and ST862. Among these strains, only one strain was <i>cfb</i> positive by qPCR, whereas all tested positive with a multitarget qPCR kit for <i>cfb</i> and <i>cps</i>. PCR amplification upstream of the <i>cfb</i> gene produced a specific band in strain PP669713 only, suggesting N-terminal <i>cfb</i> gene retention in PP669713 and complete <i>cfb</i> loss in the other strains. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed a chromosomal deletion in PP669713. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed no resistance to penicillin. However, CAMP-positive strains presented a greater prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin than CAMP-negative strains did. Our study highlights the potential risk of missed GBS detection using CAMP tests and <i>cfb</i>-targeted molecular assays.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Our work makes several novel contributions to the field. (i) We report the first documented case of a C-terminal deletion of the <i>cfb</i> gene in a CAMP-negative GBS strain, demonstrating that both N-terminal and C-terminal regions are essential for cohemolytic activity. (ii) Our findings reveal that CAMP-negative GBS strains (3.6% of isolates) are more prevalent than previously recognized, with most cases resulting from complete chromosomal deletions of the <i>cfb</i> gene. (iii) We provide evidence that single-target molecular assays targeting only the <i>cfb</i> gene may miss GBS detection, highlighting the necessity for multi-target approaches in clinical diagnostics. (iv) We demonstrate a unique antibiotic resistance pattern in CAMP-negative strains, showing significantly lower resistance to certain antibiotics compared to CAMP-positive strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0325724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054153/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03257-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03257-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产前普遍进行B族链球菌(GBS)筛查和产时抗生素预防(IAP)可有效减少早发性GBS感染。然而,影响cfb基因的染色体缺失的GBS菌株可能在CAMP测试和基于cfb的分子诊断中产生假阴性,潜在地增加了新生儿感染的风险。收集我院妊娠35-37周孕妇阴道拭子,琼脂培养。采用CAMP试验初步鉴定疑似GBS菌株,然后用VITEK-2系统进行确认。对camp阴性GBS菌株进行qPCR、16S rDNA、血清分型和多位点序列分型(MLST)检测。对camp阴性菌株进行cfb基因PCR和全基因组测序。从5794份样本中分离出GBS菌株526株(9.1%),其中camp阴性19株(3.6%),同一例患者分离出2株。19株camp阴性菌株均为血清III型和ST862型。在这些菌株中,只有一株菌株qPCR检测为cfb阳性,而cfb和cps的多靶点qPCR试剂盒检测均为阳性。cfb基因上游的PCR扩增仅在菌株PP669713中产生特异性条带,表明n端cfb基因在PP669713中保留,而在其他菌株中完全丢失。全基因组测序证实PP669713存在染色体缺失。抗生素敏感性试验显示对青霉素无耐药性。然而,与camp阴性菌株相比,camp阳性菌株对环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星的耐药率更高。我们的研究强调了使用CAMP测试和cfb靶向分子分析错过GBS检测的潜在风险。重要性:我们的工作对该领域做出了一些新的贡献。(i)我们报道了首例在camp阴性的GBS菌株中发现cfb基因c端缺失的病例,这表明n端和c端区域对溶血活性都是必不可少的。(ii)我们的研究结果显示,camp阴性的GBS菌株(占分离株的3.6%)比以前认识到的更为普遍,大多数病例是由cfb基因的染色体完全缺失引起的。(iii)我们提供的证据表明,仅针对cfb基因的单靶点分子检测可能会错过GBS检测,这突出了临床诊断中多靶点方法的必要性。(iv)我们在camp阴性菌株中证明了一种独特的抗生素耐药模式,与camp阳性菌株相比,对某些抗生素的耐药性显着降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

CAMP-negative <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i> strains exhibited complete or partial chromosomal deletions of the CAMP-factor encoding gene <i>cfb</i>.

CAMP-negative <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i> strains exhibited complete or partial chromosomal deletions of the CAMP-factor encoding gene <i>cfb</i>.

CAMP-negative <i>Streptococcus agalactiae</i> strains exhibited complete or partial chromosomal deletions of the CAMP-factor encoding gene <i>cfb</i>.

CAMP-negative Streptococcus agalactiae strains exhibited complete or partial chromosomal deletions of the CAMP-factor encoding gene cfb.

Universal antepartum group B streptococcus (GBS) screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) have effectively reduced early-onset GBS infections. However, GBS strains with chromosomal deletions affecting the cfb gene may produce false negatives in both the CAMP test and cfb-based molecular diagnostics, potentially increasing the risk of neonatal infections. Vaginal swabs were collected from pregnant women at 35-37 weeks of gestation in our hospital and cultured on agar. Suspected GBS strains were initially identified using the CAMP test and then confirmed with the VITEK-2 system. CAMP-negative GBS strains underwent additional testing by qPCR, 16S rDNA, serotyping, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). PCR for the cfb gene and whole-genome sequencing were performed on CAMP-negative strains. From 5,794 samples, 526 (9.1%) GBS strains, including 19 (3.6%) CAMP-negative strains and 2 strains from the same patient, were isolated. All 19 CAMP-negative strains were serotypes III and ST862. Among these strains, only one strain was cfb positive by qPCR, whereas all tested positive with a multitarget qPCR kit for cfb and cps. PCR amplification upstream of the cfb gene produced a specific band in strain PP669713 only, suggesting N-terminal cfb gene retention in PP669713 and complete cfb loss in the other strains. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed a chromosomal deletion in PP669713. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed no resistance to penicillin. However, CAMP-positive strains presented a greater prevalence of resistance to ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin than CAMP-negative strains did. Our study highlights the potential risk of missed GBS detection using CAMP tests and cfb-targeted molecular assays.

Importance: Our work makes several novel contributions to the field. (i) We report the first documented case of a C-terminal deletion of the cfb gene in a CAMP-negative GBS strain, demonstrating that both N-terminal and C-terminal regions are essential for cohemolytic activity. (ii) Our findings reveal that CAMP-negative GBS strains (3.6% of isolates) are more prevalent than previously recognized, with most cases resulting from complete chromosomal deletions of the cfb gene. (iii) We provide evidence that single-target molecular assays targeting only the cfb gene may miss GBS detection, highlighting the necessity for multi-target approaches in clinical diagnostics. (iv) We demonstrate a unique antibiotic resistance pattern in CAMP-negative strains, showing significantly lower resistance to certain antibiotics compared to CAMP-positive strains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书