腰椎退行性变的诊断与治疗。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frank Beyer, Peer Eysel, Jan Bredow
{"title":"腰椎退行性变的诊断与治疗。","authors":"Frank Beyer, Peer Eysel, Jan Bredow","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Certain specific degenerative changes of the lumbar spine call for a meticulous assessment of the patient's symptoms and of the findings on physical examination and diagnostic imaging. Degenerative disc disease, spinal canal stenosis, facet joint arthrosis, and the resulting deformities are discussed here, along with the appropriate treatment for each condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review is based on information from pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The history and physical examination are determinative. The findings of imaging studies are not necessarily correlated with the clinical manifestations. In the absence of red flags such as a new neurologic deficit or a suspected tumor, the patient can be treated conservatively with analgesics, physiotherapy, or specific infiltrations. If no improvement ensues, or if there is an absolute indication for surgery, decompressive and/or fusion techniques are used, depending on the particular abnormality that is present. A randomized controlled trial has shown the superiority of decompression over nonsurgical management for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] mean difference 7.8, 95% confidence interval [0.8; 14.9]). On the other hand, a study of pooled data on fusion procedures yielded a mean difference of -7.39 points in the ODI score favoring surgery [-20.26; 5.47] [p = 0.26]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For many surgical techniques, the supporting scientific evidence is sparse. The authors recommend treatment in a specialized center.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"249-256"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Changes of the Lumbar Spine.\",\"authors\":\"Frank Beyer, Peer Eysel, Jan Bredow\",\"doi\":\"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Certain specific degenerative changes of the lumbar spine call for a meticulous assessment of the patient's symptoms and of the findings on physical examination and diagnostic imaging. Degenerative disc disease, spinal canal stenosis, facet joint arthrosis, and the resulting deformities are discussed here, along with the appropriate treatment for each condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review is based on information from pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The history and physical examination are determinative. The findings of imaging studies are not necessarily correlated with the clinical manifestations. In the absence of red flags such as a new neurologic deficit or a suspected tumor, the patient can be treated conservatively with analgesics, physiotherapy, or specific infiltrations. If no improvement ensues, or if there is an absolute indication for surgery, decompressive and/or fusion techniques are used, depending on the particular abnormality that is present. A randomized controlled trial has shown the superiority of decompression over nonsurgical management for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] mean difference 7.8, 95% confidence interval [0.8; 14.9]). On the other hand, a study of pooled data on fusion procedures yielded a mean difference of -7.39 points in the ODI score favoring surgery [-20.26; 5.47] [p = 0.26]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For many surgical techniques, the supporting scientific evidence is sparse. The authors recommend treatment in a specialized center.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"volume\":\" Forthcoming\",\"pages\":\"249-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰椎某些特定的退行性改变需要对患者的症状以及体格检查和诊断成像的结果进行细致的评估。椎间盘退行性疾病、椎管狭窄、小关节关节和由此导致的畸形在此讨论,以及针对每种情况的适当治疗。方法:这篇叙述性综述是基于PubMed检索到的相关出版物的信息。结果:病史和体格检查具有决定性。影像学检查结果与临床表现不一定相关。在没有危险信号的情况下,如新的神经功能缺陷或疑似肿瘤,患者可以使用镇痛药、物理治疗或特异性浸润进行保守治疗。如果没有改善,或者有手术的绝对指征,则根据存在的特殊异常使用减压和/或融合技术。一项随机对照试验显示减压治疗腰椎管狭窄优于非手术治疗(Oswestry残疾指数[ODI]均值差7.8,95%可信区间[0.8;14.9])。另一方面,一项关于融合手术的汇总数据研究显示,ODI评分平均差-7.39分,有利于手术[-20.26;[p = 0.26])。结论:对于许多外科技术,支持的科学证据很少。作者建议在专门的中心进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Changes of the Lumbar Spine.

Background: Certain specific degenerative changes of the lumbar spine call for a meticulous assessment of the patient's symptoms and of the findings on physical examination and diagnostic imaging. Degenerative disc disease, spinal canal stenosis, facet joint arthrosis, and the resulting deformities are discussed here, along with the appropriate treatment for each condition.

Methods: This narrative review is based on information from pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed.

Results: The history and physical examination are determinative. The findings of imaging studies are not necessarily correlated with the clinical manifestations. In the absence of red flags such as a new neurologic deficit or a suspected tumor, the patient can be treated conservatively with analgesics, physiotherapy, or specific infiltrations. If no improvement ensues, or if there is an absolute indication for surgery, decompressive and/or fusion techniques are used, depending on the particular abnormality that is present. A randomized controlled trial has shown the superiority of decompression over nonsurgical management for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] mean difference 7.8, 95% confidence interval [0.8; 14.9]). On the other hand, a study of pooled data on fusion procedures yielded a mean difference of -7.39 points in the ODI score favoring surgery [-20.26; 5.47] [p = 0.26]).

Conclusion: For many surgical techniques, the supporting scientific evidence is sparse. The authors recommend treatment in a specialized center.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信