综合老年评估对老年前列腺癌患者治疗决策的影响。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Maëva Bonneau, Zara Steinmeyer, Mathilde Morisseau, Stéphanie Lozano, Patricia Barbe, Catherine Chauvet, Delphine Brechemier, Loïc Mourey, Laurent Balardy
{"title":"综合老年评估对老年前列腺癌患者治疗决策的影响。","authors":"Maëva Bonneau, Zara Steinmeyer, Mathilde Morisseau, Stéphanie Lozano, Patricia Barbe, Catherine Chauvet, Delphine Brechemier, Loïc Mourey, Laurent Balardy","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13961-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men aged above 75 years old. Given their heterogeneity, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology recommends using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to adapt anticancer treatment management according to their geriatric status. While the theoretical value of this approach is in no doubt, the impact of the CGA on the final therapeutic decision remains elusive. This study therefore investigated the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and described the factors associated with a change in treatment plan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective study included prostate cancer patients who received a CGA prior to a therapeutic decision from January 2012 to December 2022. The CGA included medical, nutritional, cognitive, social, functional and psychological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>140 patients were included, of whom 57 (40.7%) benefited from a change in their therapeutic plan after CGA, all in favour of a less aggressive treatment. There was no difference in event-free (EFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients with or without a therapeutic modification (HR for OS = 1.12 [0.68;1.84] p = 0.048). Factors associated with a change in treatment plan were a WHO performance status > 1, a high age-adjusted Charlson score, polymedication, an impaired functional independence with the ADL (Activities of Daily Living) scale and a 'frail' or 'vulnerable' geriatric profile according to Balducci's classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to prostate cancer treatment plan initiation lead to therapeutic de-escalation in 40% of cases of without affecting overall survival or event-free survival. This adaptation offering a more tailored cancer management while preventing functional impact of treatment due to toxicity and improving patient quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered as (number's register: F20240123102237) and MR004 (CNIL number: 23RDUROL01).</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"642"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older prostate cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Maëva Bonneau, Zara Steinmeyer, Mathilde Morisseau, Stéphanie Lozano, Patricia Barbe, Catherine Chauvet, Delphine Brechemier, Loïc Mourey, Laurent Balardy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-025-13961-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men aged above 75 years old. Given their heterogeneity, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology recommends using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to adapt anticancer treatment management according to their geriatric status. While the theoretical value of this approach is in no doubt, the impact of the CGA on the final therapeutic decision remains elusive. This study therefore investigated the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and described the factors associated with a change in treatment plan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective study included prostate cancer patients who received a CGA prior to a therapeutic decision from January 2012 to December 2022. The CGA included medical, nutritional, cognitive, social, functional and psychological evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>140 patients were included, of whom 57 (40.7%) benefited from a change in their therapeutic plan after CGA, all in favour of a less aggressive treatment. There was no difference in event-free (EFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients with or without a therapeutic modification (HR for OS = 1.12 [0.68;1.84] p = 0.048). Factors associated with a change in treatment plan were a WHO performance status > 1, a high age-adjusted Charlson score, polymedication, an impaired functional independence with the ADL (Activities of Daily Living) scale and a 'frail' or 'vulnerable' geriatric profile according to Balducci's classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to prostate cancer treatment plan initiation lead to therapeutic de-escalation in 40% of cases of without affecting overall survival or event-free survival. This adaptation offering a more tailored cancer management while preventing functional impact of treatment due to toxicity and improving patient quality of life.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered as (number's register: F20240123102237) and MR004 (CNIL number: 23RDUROL01).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"642\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13961-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13961-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺癌是75岁以上男性最常见的癌症。鉴于他们的异质性,国际老年肿瘤学会建议使用综合老年评估(CGA)来根据他们的老年状态调整抗癌治疗管理。虽然这种方法的理论价值是毫无疑问的,但CGA对最终治疗决策的影响仍然难以捉摸。因此,本研究调查了综合老年评估对诊断为前列腺癌的老年患者治疗决策的影响,并描述了与治疗计划改变相关的因素。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2012年1月至2022年12月在治疗决定之前接受CGA的前列腺癌患者。CGA包括医学、营养、认知、社会、功能和心理评价。结果:纳入140例患者,其中57例(40.7%)受益于CGA后治疗方案的改变,均倾向于较少的积极治疗。无事件(EFS)或总生存期(OS)在接受或未接受治疗的患者之间没有差异(OS的HR = 1.12 [0.68;1.84] p = 0.048)。根据Balducci的分类,与治疗计划改变相关的因素是WHO的表现状态为bbb1,年龄调整后的Charlson评分较高,多种药物治疗,ADL(日常生活活动)量表的功能独立性受损以及“虚弱”或“易受伤害”的老年特征。结论:在前列腺癌治疗计划开始前的全面老年评估导致40%的病例的治疗降级,而不影响总生存期或无事件生存期。这种适应提供了更有针对性的癌症管理,同时防止由于毒性治疗的功能影响,提高患者的生活质量。试验注册:本研究注册号为F20240123102237, MR004 (CNIL号:23RDUROL01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older prostate cancer patients.

Background: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men aged above 75 years old. Given their heterogeneity, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology recommends using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to adapt anticancer treatment management according to their geriatric status. While the theoretical value of this approach is in no doubt, the impact of the CGA on the final therapeutic decision remains elusive. This study therefore investigated the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and described the factors associated with a change in treatment plan.

Methods: This single-centre retrospective study included prostate cancer patients who received a CGA prior to a therapeutic decision from January 2012 to December 2022. The CGA included medical, nutritional, cognitive, social, functional and psychological evaluation.

Results: 140 patients were included, of whom 57 (40.7%) benefited from a change in their therapeutic plan after CGA, all in favour of a less aggressive treatment. There was no difference in event-free (EFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients with or without a therapeutic modification (HR for OS = 1.12 [0.68;1.84] p = 0.048). Factors associated with a change in treatment plan were a WHO performance status > 1, a high age-adjusted Charlson score, polymedication, an impaired functional independence with the ADL (Activities of Daily Living) scale and a 'frail' or 'vulnerable' geriatric profile according to Balducci's classification.

Conclusion: A comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to prostate cancer treatment plan initiation lead to therapeutic de-escalation in 40% of cases of without affecting overall survival or event-free survival. This adaptation offering a more tailored cancer management while preventing functional impact of treatment due to toxicity and improving patient quality of life.

Trial registration: The study was registered as (number's register: F20240123102237) and MR004 (CNIL number: 23RDUROL01).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信