危重患者肠内喂养不耐受的危险因素:最新的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Si Wang, Yang He, Jing Yi, Liyan Sha
{"title":"危重患者肠内喂养不耐受的危险因素:最新的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Si Wang, Yang He, Jing Yi, Liyan Sha","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03837-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the factors influencing enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WanFang and CBM databases were searched. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to explore the influence of individual studies on the pooled results of the included studies using a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model. The pooled results were expressed as the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls). Finally, a funnel plot was developed to describe the publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies involving 30,688 participants were included. Meta-analysis results showed that age, body mass index (BMI), APACHE II score, renal insufficiency, digestive system diseases, hypoproteinemia, sepsis, and post-pyloric feeding, starting feeding within 48 h, feeding pattern, nutritional formula, sedative drugs, vasoactive drugs, use of more than two antibiotics, oral potassium preparation, mechanical ventilation, days of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and mortality were the influencing factors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the direction of the pooled effect size did not change after excluding each study one by one, suggesting that the results of the meta-analysis were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the influencing factors, medical staff can pay attention to the high-risk patients at ICU admission to reduce the risk of feeding intolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Si Wang, Yang He, Jing Yi, Liyan Sha\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-025-03837-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the factors influencing enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WanFang and CBM databases were searched. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to explore the influence of individual studies on the pooled results of the included studies using a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model. The pooled results were expressed as the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls). Finally, a funnel plot was developed to describe the publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies involving 30,688 participants were included. Meta-analysis results showed that age, body mass index (BMI), APACHE II score, renal insufficiency, digestive system diseases, hypoproteinemia, sepsis, and post-pyloric feeding, starting feeding within 48 h, feeding pattern, nutritional formula, sedative drugs, vasoactive drugs, use of more than two antibiotics, oral potassium preparation, mechanical ventilation, days of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and mortality were the influencing factors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the direction of the pooled effect size did not change after excluding each study one by one, suggesting that the results of the meta-analysis were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the influencing factors, medical staff can pay attention to the high-risk patients at ICU admission to reduce the risk of feeding intolerance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03837-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03837-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本荟萃分析旨在评估危重患者肠内营养喂养不耐受的影响因素。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Medline、Web of Science、CNKI、VIP、万方、CBM等数据库。采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型进行敏感性分析,探讨单个研究对纳入研究的汇总结果的影响。合并结果用比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(Cls)表示。最后,绘制漏斗图来描述发表偏倚。结果:共纳入23项研究,涉及30,688名受试者。meta分析结果显示,年龄、体重指数(BMI)、APACHEⅱ评分、肾功能不全、消化系统疾病、低蛋白血症、脓毒症、幽门后喂养、48 h内开始喂养、喂养方式、营养配方、镇静药物、血管活性药物、使用两种以上抗生素、口服钾制剂、机械通气、机械通气天数、ICU住院时间、危重病人肠内营养喂养不耐受的影响因素是死亡率。敏感度分析结果显示,逐一排除各研究后,汇总效应大小的方向没有改变,说明meta分析结果是稳健的。结论:根据影响因素,医护人员可在ICU入院时对高危患者给予关注,降低喂养不耐受的发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk factors for enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the factors influencing enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, WanFang and CBM databases were searched. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to explore the influence of individual studies on the pooled results of the included studies using a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model. The pooled results were expressed as the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls). Finally, a funnel plot was developed to describe the publication bias.

Results: Twenty-three studies involving 30,688 participants were included. Meta-analysis results showed that age, body mass index (BMI), APACHE II score, renal insufficiency, digestive system diseases, hypoproteinemia, sepsis, and post-pyloric feeding, starting feeding within 48 h, feeding pattern, nutritional formula, sedative drugs, vasoactive drugs, use of more than two antibiotics, oral potassium preparation, mechanical ventilation, days of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and mortality were the influencing factors of enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the direction of the pooled effect size did not change after excluding each study one by one, suggesting that the results of the meta-analysis were robust.

Conclusions: According to the influencing factors, medical staff can pay attention to the high-risk patients at ICU admission to reduce the risk of feeding intolerance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信