α-胎蛋白模型与米兰标准预测肝细胞癌肝切除术后预后的比较:多中心研究

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf041
Chao Li, Yong-Kang Diao, Yi-Fan Li, Shao-Dong Lv, Xian-Ming Wang, Xue-Dong Wang, Qi-Xuan Zheng, Hong Wang, Han Liu, Kong-Ying Lin, Ying-Jian Liang, Ya-Hao Zhou, Wei-Min Gu, Ming-Da Wang, Lan-Qing Yao, Xin-Fei Xu, Jia-Hao Xu, Li-Hui Gu, Timothy M Pawlik, Feng Shen, Tian Yang
{"title":"α-胎蛋白模型与米兰标准预测肝细胞癌肝切除术后预后的比较:多中心研究","authors":"Chao Li, Yong-Kang Diao, Yi-Fan Li, Shao-Dong Lv, Xian-Ming Wang, Xue-Dong Wang, Qi-Xuan Zheng, Hong Wang, Han Liu, Kong-Ying Lin, Ying-Jian Liang, Ya-Hao Zhou, Wei-Min Gu, Ming-Da Wang, Lan-Qing Yao, Xin-Fei Xu, Jia-Hao Xu, Li-Hui Gu, Timothy M Pawlik, Feng Shen, Tian Yang","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Milan criteria and the French α-fetoprotein (AFP) model have both been validated for predicting outcomes after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, with the Milan criteria also used for predicting outcomes after hepatic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the AFP model's predictive value for recurrence and survival following hepatocellular carcinoma resection and compare its performance with that of the Milan criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for patients who underwent hepatocellular carcinoma resection between 2002 and 2021 were analysed. For both the AFP model and Milan criteria, patients were divided into two groups: those with hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the AFP model (scores ≤ 2 and > 2 points, respectively) and the Milan criteria. Cumulative recurrence and overall survival rates were compared between patients within and beyond the AFP model. Predictions of recurrence and overall survival by the AFP model and Milan criteria were compared using net reclassification improvement and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1968 patients evaluated, 1058 (53.8%) and 940 (47.8%) were classified as beyond on the AFP model and Milan criteria, respectively. After controlling for competing factors on multivariable analyses, being beyond the AFP model was independently associated with recurrence and worse overall survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Time-dependent net reclassification improvement and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated that the AFP model was superior to the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence. Of note, patients who were classified as beyond both the Milan criteria and AFP model had an even higher risk of postoperative recurrence and mortality (hazard ratios 1.51 and 1.47, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The French AFP model demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy to the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence and survival after hepatocellular carcinoma resection. The AFP model not only effectively stratified patient risk but also identified a subgroup of high-risk patients among those beyond the Milan criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"α-Fetoprotein model versus Milan criteria in predicting outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentre study.\",\"authors\":\"Chao Li, Yong-Kang Diao, Yi-Fan Li, Shao-Dong Lv, Xian-Ming Wang, Xue-Dong Wang, Qi-Xuan Zheng, Hong Wang, Han Liu, Kong-Ying Lin, Ying-Jian Liang, Ya-Hao Zhou, Wei-Min Gu, Ming-Da Wang, Lan-Qing Yao, Xin-Fei Xu, Jia-Hao Xu, Li-Hui Gu, Timothy M Pawlik, Feng Shen, Tian Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Milan criteria and the French α-fetoprotein (AFP) model have both been validated for predicting outcomes after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, with the Milan criteria also used for predicting outcomes after hepatic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the AFP model's predictive value for recurrence and survival following hepatocellular carcinoma resection and compare its performance with that of the Milan criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for patients who underwent hepatocellular carcinoma resection between 2002 and 2021 were analysed. For both the AFP model and Milan criteria, patients were divided into two groups: those with hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the AFP model (scores ≤ 2 and > 2 points, respectively) and the Milan criteria. Cumulative recurrence and overall survival rates were compared between patients within and beyond the AFP model. Predictions of recurrence and overall survival by the AFP model and Milan criteria were compared using net reclassification improvement and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1968 patients evaluated, 1058 (53.8%) and 940 (47.8%) were classified as beyond on the AFP model and Milan criteria, respectively. After controlling for competing factors on multivariable analyses, being beyond the AFP model was independently associated with recurrence and worse overall survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Time-dependent net reclassification improvement and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated that the AFP model was superior to the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence. Of note, patients who were classified as beyond both the Milan criteria and AFP model had an even higher risk of postoperative recurrence and mortality (hazard ratios 1.51 and 1.47, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The French AFP model demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy to the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence and survival after hepatocellular carcinoma resection. The AFP model not only effectively stratified patient risk but also identified a subgroup of high-risk patients among those beyond the Milan criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJS Open\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf041\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraf041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:米兰标准和法国α-胎蛋白(AFP)模型均已被证实可用于预测肝癌肝移植后的预后,米兰标准也可用于预测肝切除术后的预后。本研究的目的是评估AFP模型对肝细胞癌切除术后复发和生存的预测价值,并将其与米兰标准的表现进行比较。方法:分析2002年至2021年间接受肝细胞癌切除术的患者资料。对于AFP模型和米兰标准,患者分为两组:AFP模型内和AFP模型外的肝细胞癌(评分分别≤2分和bb0 2分)和米兰标准。比较AFP模型内和模型外患者的累积复发率和总生存率。使用净再分类改善和受试者工作特征曲线下面积分析比较AFP模型和Milan标准预测的复发和总生存期。结果:1968例患者中,AFP模型和Milan标准分别为1058例(53.8%)和940例(47.8%)。在多变量分析中控制了竞争因素后,超出AFP模型与肝细胞癌切除术后的复发和更差的总生存率独立相关。时间依赖的净重分类改善和受试者工作特征曲线下面积分析表明,AFP模型在预测复发方面优于米兰标准。值得注意的是,超出米兰标准和AFP模型的患者术后复发和死亡风险更高(风险比分别为1.51和1.47)。结论:法国AFP模型在预测肝细胞癌切除术后的复发和生存方面比米兰标准具有更高的预后准确性。AFP模型不仅有效地对患者风险进行分层,而且还在超出米兰标准的患者中确定了高风险患者亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
α-Fetoprotein model versus Milan criteria in predicting outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentre study.

Background: The Milan criteria and the French α-fetoprotein (AFP) model have both been validated for predicting outcomes after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, with the Milan criteria also used for predicting outcomes after hepatic resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the AFP model's predictive value for recurrence and survival following hepatocellular carcinoma resection and compare its performance with that of the Milan criteria.

Methods: Data for patients who underwent hepatocellular carcinoma resection between 2002 and 2021 were analysed. For both the AFP model and Milan criteria, patients were divided into two groups: those with hepatocellular carcinoma within and beyond the AFP model (scores ≤ 2 and > 2 points, respectively) and the Milan criteria. Cumulative recurrence and overall survival rates were compared between patients within and beyond the AFP model. Predictions of recurrence and overall survival by the AFP model and Milan criteria were compared using net reclassification improvement and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

Results: Among 1968 patients evaluated, 1058 (53.8%) and 940 (47.8%) were classified as beyond on the AFP model and Milan criteria, respectively. After controlling for competing factors on multivariable analyses, being beyond the AFP model was independently associated with recurrence and worse overall survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Time-dependent net reclassification improvement and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated that the AFP model was superior to the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence. Of note, patients who were classified as beyond both the Milan criteria and AFP model had an even higher risk of postoperative recurrence and mortality (hazard ratios 1.51 and 1.47, respectively).

Conclusion: The French AFP model demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy to the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence and survival after hepatocellular carcinoma resection. The AFP model not only effectively stratified patient risk but also identified a subgroup of high-risk patients among those beyond the Milan criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信