{"title":"治疗策略和决策优化牛皮癣治疗:法国国家调查基于虚拟病例小插曲","authors":"Nathalie Quiles-Tsimaratos, Nicole Jouan, Annie Vermersch-Langlin, Anne-Bénédicte Duval-Modeste, Cristèle Nicolas, Caroline Lislaud, Baptiste Roux, Emmanuel Mahé","doi":"10.1155/dth/7294541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Despite current treatments for psoriasis, effective disease control remains challenging for physicians. Current recommendations provide information on when treatment should be optimized, but providing guidance on how to optimize treatments in real-word practice is complex. To examine the decision-making practices of dermatologists when optimizing the management of mild or moderate-to-severe psoriasis, we conducted a nationwide, virtual case vignette-based survey among French dermatologists. Participants reviewed four case vignettes. Data on management suggestions from the dermatologists were collected using questionnaires embedded in the case vignettes. Ninety dermatologists reviewed 356 virtual case vignettes. Of these, 99.4% contained a randomly generated profile describing a virtual psoriasis patient who had responded to current therapy but required treatment optimization, and 23.0% involved mild psoriasis treated with topical treatments, 77.0% involved moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated by conventional systemics or biologics, 59.9% involved psoriasis that had moderate or severe-to-very severe impact on HRQoL, 48.6% had joint involvement, and 58.7% had persistent skin lesions. For virtual patients with mild psoriasis involving topical treatments alone (<i>n</i> = 82), the dermatologists suggested switching or modifying the treatment in 81.7% of cases, most commonly by initiating conventional oral systemic therapy. For virtual cases with moderate-to severe psoriasis involving conventional oral systemic therapies (<i>N</i> = 90), the most common suggestion was to switch treatment (54.4% of cases), most notably to biologic therapy. Switching to a second-line or subsequent-line biologic was the most common suggestion for virtual cases already undergoing biologic therapy. Overall, modifying the existing treatment was suggested for 31.5% of the virtual cases, most notably by introducing new treatment combinations (biologics with conventional systemic and/or topical treatments). Impact on HRQoL, joint involvement, and persistent skin lesions were identified as factors influencing dermatologist decision-making (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Our findings provide valuable insights into the current decision-making practices of French dermatologists when optimizing the management of mild or moderate-to-severe psoriasis.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11045,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Therapy","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/dth/7294541","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Strategies and Decision-Making to Optimize Psoriasis Treatment: A French National Survey Based on Virtual Case Vignettes\",\"authors\":\"Nathalie Quiles-Tsimaratos, Nicole Jouan, Annie Vermersch-Langlin, Anne-Bénédicte Duval-Modeste, Cristèle Nicolas, Caroline Lislaud, Baptiste Roux, Emmanuel Mahé\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/dth/7294541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Despite current treatments for psoriasis, effective disease control remains challenging for physicians. Current recommendations provide information on when treatment should be optimized, but providing guidance on how to optimize treatments in real-word practice is complex. To examine the decision-making practices of dermatologists when optimizing the management of mild or moderate-to-severe psoriasis, we conducted a nationwide, virtual case vignette-based survey among French dermatologists. Participants reviewed four case vignettes. Data on management suggestions from the dermatologists were collected using questionnaires embedded in the case vignettes. Ninety dermatologists reviewed 356 virtual case vignettes. Of these, 99.4% contained a randomly generated profile describing a virtual psoriasis patient who had responded to current therapy but required treatment optimization, and 23.0% involved mild psoriasis treated with topical treatments, 77.0% involved moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated by conventional systemics or biologics, 59.9% involved psoriasis that had moderate or severe-to-very severe impact on HRQoL, 48.6% had joint involvement, and 58.7% had persistent skin lesions. For virtual patients with mild psoriasis involving topical treatments alone (<i>n</i> = 82), the dermatologists suggested switching or modifying the treatment in 81.7% of cases, most commonly by initiating conventional oral systemic therapy. For virtual cases with moderate-to severe psoriasis involving conventional oral systemic therapies (<i>N</i> = 90), the most common suggestion was to switch treatment (54.4% of cases), most notably to biologic therapy. Switching to a second-line or subsequent-line biologic was the most common suggestion for virtual cases already undergoing biologic therapy. Overall, modifying the existing treatment was suggested for 31.5% of the virtual cases, most notably by introducing new treatment combinations (biologics with conventional systemic and/or topical treatments). Impact on HRQoL, joint involvement, and persistent skin lesions were identified as factors influencing dermatologist decision-making (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Our findings provide valuable insights into the current decision-making practices of French dermatologists when optimizing the management of mild or moderate-to-severe psoriasis.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Therapy\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/dth/7294541\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/dth/7294541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/dth/7294541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Therapeutic Strategies and Decision-Making to Optimize Psoriasis Treatment: A French National Survey Based on Virtual Case Vignettes
Despite current treatments for psoriasis, effective disease control remains challenging for physicians. Current recommendations provide information on when treatment should be optimized, but providing guidance on how to optimize treatments in real-word practice is complex. To examine the decision-making practices of dermatologists when optimizing the management of mild or moderate-to-severe psoriasis, we conducted a nationwide, virtual case vignette-based survey among French dermatologists. Participants reviewed four case vignettes. Data on management suggestions from the dermatologists were collected using questionnaires embedded in the case vignettes. Ninety dermatologists reviewed 356 virtual case vignettes. Of these, 99.4% contained a randomly generated profile describing a virtual psoriasis patient who had responded to current therapy but required treatment optimization, and 23.0% involved mild psoriasis treated with topical treatments, 77.0% involved moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated by conventional systemics or biologics, 59.9% involved psoriasis that had moderate or severe-to-very severe impact on HRQoL, 48.6% had joint involvement, and 58.7% had persistent skin lesions. For virtual patients with mild psoriasis involving topical treatments alone (n = 82), the dermatologists suggested switching or modifying the treatment in 81.7% of cases, most commonly by initiating conventional oral systemic therapy. For virtual cases with moderate-to severe psoriasis involving conventional oral systemic therapies (N = 90), the most common suggestion was to switch treatment (54.4% of cases), most notably to biologic therapy. Switching to a second-line or subsequent-line biologic was the most common suggestion for virtual cases already undergoing biologic therapy. Overall, modifying the existing treatment was suggested for 31.5% of the virtual cases, most notably by introducing new treatment combinations (biologics with conventional systemic and/or topical treatments). Impact on HRQoL, joint involvement, and persistent skin lesions were identified as factors influencing dermatologist decision-making (p < 0.001). Our findings provide valuable insights into the current decision-making practices of French dermatologists when optimizing the management of mild or moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
期刊介绍:
Dermatologic Therapy has been created to fill an important void in the dermatologic literature: the lack of a readily available source of up-to-date information on the treatment of specific cutaneous diseases and the practical application of specific treatment modalities. Each issue of the journal consists of a series of scholarly review articles written by leaders in dermatology in which they describe, in very specific terms, how they treat particular cutaneous diseases and how they use specific therapeutic agents. The information contained in each issue is so practical and detailed that the reader should be able to directly apply various treatment approaches to daily clinical situations. Because of the specific and practical nature of this publication, Dermatologic Therapy not only serves as a readily available resource for the day-to-day treatment of patients, but also as an evolving therapeutic textbook for the treatment of dermatologic diseases.