Briony Hill, Helia Khalesi, Chloe Tran, Helen Skouteris, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Jacqueline Boyle, Angela C. Incollingo Rodriguez, Jane Martin, Lucie Rychetnik
{"title":"将体重污名镜头应用于澳大利亚和国际上孕前、怀孕和产后妇女的肥胖相关政策：一项地图审查","authors":"Briony Hill, Helia Khalesi, Chloe Tran, Helen Skouteris, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Jacqueline Boyle, Angela C. Incollingo Rodriguez, Jane Martin, Lucie Rychetnik","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>Weight stigma significantly affects preconception, pregnant and postpartum (PPP) women. Existing policies and guidelines do not adequately address weight stigma and may inadvertently contribute to it. This mapping review aimed to identify gaps in addressing weight stigma in current Australian and international obesity-related policies relevant to PPP women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a mapping review of Australian state-based and national and international obesity-related policies relevant to PPP women through government websites and guideline databases. Policy screening and data extraction followed three frameworks (Attribution Theory; Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework; Framework for Policy Mobilisation). Analyses were stratified by the policy's direct or indirect relevance to PPP women, and Australian and international policies were compared. Strength and gaps in relation to weight stigma were identified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-one Australian and 18 international policies were included. Ten (24%) Australian policies explicitly mentioned weight stigma and 13 (31%) met criteria for potentially blaming people for their weight or body size. Acknowledgement of drivers and impacts of weight stigma and adequate mobilisation plans were scarce. Findings were consistent across state and national Australian policies, PPP populations and international comparisons. Strengths of policies comprehensively addressing weight stigma were incorporating lived experience consumers' voices and acknowledging obesity's complex and multifactorial nature. Potential improvements included focussing on nonstigmatising language and discourse.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Weight stigma is rarely recognised or not adequately addressed in obesity-related policies for PPP women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>Eliminating weight stigma in policies can improve public narratives around obesity, clinical practice and reproductive-aged women's experiences and outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying a Weight Stigma Lens to Australian and International Obesity-Related Policies for Women Across the Preconception, Pregnancy and Postpartum Periods: A Mapping Review\",\"authors\":\"Briony Hill, Helia Khalesi, Chloe Tran, Helen Skouteris, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Jacqueline Boyle, Angela C. Incollingo Rodriguez, Jane Martin, Lucie Rychetnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpja.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\\n \\n <p>Weight stigma significantly affects preconception, pregnant and postpartum (PPP) women. Existing policies and guidelines do not adequately address weight stigma and may inadvertently contribute to it. This mapping review aimed to identify gaps in addressing weight stigma in current Australian and international obesity-related policies relevant to PPP women.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a mapping review of Australian state-based and national and international obesity-related policies relevant to PPP women through government websites and guideline databases. Policy screening and data extraction followed three frameworks (Attribution Theory; Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework; Framework for Policy Mobilisation). Analyses were stratified by the policy's direct or indirect relevance to PPP women, and Australian and international policies were compared. Strength and gaps in relation to weight stigma were identified.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-one Australian and 18 international policies were included. Ten (24%) Australian policies explicitly mentioned weight stigma and 13 (31%) met criteria for potentially blaming people for their weight or body size. Acknowledgement of drivers and impacts of weight stigma and adequate mobilisation plans were scarce. Findings were consistent across state and national Australian policies, PPP populations and international comparisons. Strengths of policies comprehensively addressing weight stigma were incorporating lived experience consumers' voices and acknowledging obesity's complex and multifactorial nature. Potential improvements included focussing on nonstigmatising language and discourse.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Weight stigma is rarely recognised or not adequately addressed in obesity-related policies for PPP women.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> So What?</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eliminating weight stigma in policies can improve public narratives around obesity, clinical practice and reproductive-aged women's experiences and outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Applying a Weight Stigma Lens to Australian and International Obesity-Related Policies for Women Across the Preconception, Pregnancy and Postpartum Periods: A Mapping Review
Issue Addressed
Weight stigma significantly affects preconception, pregnant and postpartum (PPP) women. Existing policies and guidelines do not adequately address weight stigma and may inadvertently contribute to it. This mapping review aimed to identify gaps in addressing weight stigma in current Australian and international obesity-related policies relevant to PPP women.
Methods
We conducted a mapping review of Australian state-based and national and international obesity-related policies relevant to PPP women through government websites and guideline databases. Policy screening and data extraction followed three frameworks (Attribution Theory; Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework; Framework for Policy Mobilisation). Analyses were stratified by the policy's direct or indirect relevance to PPP women, and Australian and international policies were compared. Strength and gaps in relation to weight stigma were identified.
Results
Forty-one Australian and 18 international policies were included. Ten (24%) Australian policies explicitly mentioned weight stigma and 13 (31%) met criteria for potentially blaming people for their weight or body size. Acknowledgement of drivers and impacts of weight stigma and adequate mobilisation plans were scarce. Findings were consistent across state and national Australian policies, PPP populations and international comparisons. Strengths of policies comprehensively addressing weight stigma were incorporating lived experience consumers' voices and acknowledging obesity's complex and multifactorial nature. Potential improvements included focussing on nonstigmatising language and discourse.
Conclusions
Weight stigma is rarely recognised or not adequately addressed in obesity-related policies for PPP women.
So What?
Eliminating weight stigma in policies can improve public narratives around obesity, clinical practice and reproductive-aged women's experiences and outcomes.
期刊介绍：
The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
