Sandra Pareja-Ortega, Rafael A. Cabral-Tena, Alma Paola Rodríguez-Troncoso, Lorenzo Álvarez-Filip, Luis E. Calderon-Aguilera, J. Adán Avilés-Chávez, Raquel Negrete-Aranda, Amílcar L. Cupul-Magaña
{"title":"次生钙化剂在墨西哥太平洋珊瑚礁和岩石礁的形成和维持中的作用","authors":"Sandra Pareja-Ortega, Rafael A. Cabral-Tena, Alma Paola Rodríguez-Troncoso, Lorenzo Álvarez-Filip, Luis E. Calderon-Aguilera, J. Adán Avilés-Chávez, Raquel Negrete-Aranda, Amílcar L. Cupul-Magaña","doi":"10.1111/maec.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Carbonate production by sclerobionts was quantified with calcification-accretion units (CAUs) to evaluate the roles of different taxonomic groups in the construction and maintenance of coral reef structures in two sites in the Mexican Pacific with contrasting environmental characteristics: Yelapa and Isla Espíritu Santo (IES). Five CAUs were collected every 6 months for 2 years. The average calcification rate in Yelapa and IES was 1.04 ± 0.11 kg m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> and 1.01 ± 0.82 kg m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; no difference in calcification was found between sites (<i>H</i> = 0.13, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.71), although significant differences in calcification were found over time (<i>H</i> = 9.13, df = 3, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Barnacles exhibited the highest calcification rate (Yelapa: 0.63 ± 0.8 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.54 ± 0.6 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), followed by mollusks (Yelapa: 0.27 ± 0.35, IES: 0.18 ± 0.26 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), crustose coralline algae (CCA) (Yelapa: 0.025 ± 0.029 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.08 ± 0.11 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), and bryozoans (Yelapa: 0.04 ± 0.06 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.11 ± 0.11 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). Cover was dominated by barnacles (27.7%), CCA (16.5%), and mollusks (13.7%) in Yelapa and by bryozoans (27.9%), CCA (20.4%), and barnacles (17.4%) in IES. The coverage of all groups (except CCA) was different between sites, and all taxonomic groups (except foraminifera) exhibited differences over time. The role of each taxonomic group was attributed according to their substrate preference (exposed or cryptic). In Yelapa, bryozoans and polychaetes filled cavities, while CCAs and bryozoans contributed to vertical reef accretion in IES.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49883,"journal":{"name":"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Roles of Secondary Calcifiers in Reef Construction and Maintenance in Coral and Rocky Reefs of the Mexican Pacific\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Pareja-Ortega, Rafael A. Cabral-Tena, Alma Paola Rodríguez-Troncoso, Lorenzo Álvarez-Filip, Luis E. Calderon-Aguilera, J. Adán Avilés-Chávez, Raquel Negrete-Aranda, Amílcar L. Cupul-Magaña\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/maec.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Carbonate production by sclerobionts was quantified with calcification-accretion units (CAUs) to evaluate the roles of different taxonomic groups in the construction and maintenance of coral reef structures in two sites in the Mexican Pacific with contrasting environmental characteristics: Yelapa and Isla Espíritu Santo (IES). Five CAUs were collected every 6 months for 2 years. The average calcification rate in Yelapa and IES was 1.04 ± 0.11 kg m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup> and 1.01 ± 0.82 kg m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; no difference in calcification was found between sites (<i>H</i> = 0.13, df = 1, <i>p</i> = 0.71), although significant differences in calcification were found over time (<i>H</i> = 9.13, df = 3, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Barnacles exhibited the highest calcification rate (Yelapa: 0.63 ± 0.8 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.54 ± 0.6 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), followed by mollusks (Yelapa: 0.27 ± 0.35, IES: 0.18 ± 0.26 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), crustose coralline algae (CCA) (Yelapa: 0.025 ± 0.029 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.08 ± 0.11 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>), and bryozoans (Yelapa: 0.04 ± 0.06 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>; IES: 0.11 ± 0.11 kg CaCO<sub>3</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). Cover was dominated by barnacles (27.7%), CCA (16.5%), and mollusks (13.7%) in Yelapa and by bryozoans (27.9%), CCA (20.4%), and barnacles (17.4%) in IES. The coverage of all groups (except CCA) was different between sites, and all taxonomic groups (except foraminifera) exhibited differences over time. The role of each taxonomic group was attributed according to their substrate preference (exposed or cryptic). In Yelapa, bryozoans and polychaetes filled cavities, while CCAs and bryozoans contributed to vertical reef accretion in IES.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maec.70015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Ecology-An Evolutionary Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maec.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用钙化-增生单元(CAUs)定量分析了墨西哥太平洋两个环境特征不同的地点:Yelapa和Isla Espíritu Santo (IES),以评价不同分类类群在珊瑚礁结构建设和维护中的作用。每6个月收集5例cau,随访2年。Yelapa和IES的平均钙化率分别为1.04±0.11 kg m−2 year−1和1.01±0.82 kg m−2 year−1;不同部位的钙化没有差异(H = 0.13, df = 1, p = 0.71),但随着时间的推移,钙化有显著差异(H = 9.13, df = 3, p = 0.03)。藤壶的钙化率最高(叶拉巴:0.63±0.8 kg CaCO3 m−2年−1;IES: 0.54±0.6 kg CaCO3 m−2年−1),其次是软体动物(Yelapa: 0.27±0.35,IES: 0.18±0.26 kg CaCO3 m−2年−1),甲壳珊瑚藻(CCA) (Yelapa: 0.025±0.029 kg CaCO3 m−2年−1;IES: 0.08±0.11 kg CaCO3 m−2年−1),苔藓虫(Yelapa: 0.04±0.06 kg CaCO3 m−2年−1;IES: 0.11±0.11 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1)。叶拉帕以藤壶(27.7%)、CCA(16.5%)和软体动物(13.7%)为主,IES以苔藓虫(27.9%)、CCA(20.4%)和藤壶(17.4%)为主。所有类群(CCA除外)的覆盖度在不同的站点之间存在差异,所有分类类群(有孔虫除外)都表现出不同的时间差异。每个分类类群的作用是根据它们对底物的偏好(暴露的或隐蔽的)来确定的。在叶拉帕,苔藓虫和多毛体填充空腔,而在IES中,cca和苔藓虫对垂直礁体增生有贡献。
The Roles of Secondary Calcifiers in Reef Construction and Maintenance in Coral and Rocky Reefs of the Mexican Pacific
Carbonate production by sclerobionts was quantified with calcification-accretion units (CAUs) to evaluate the roles of different taxonomic groups in the construction and maintenance of coral reef structures in two sites in the Mexican Pacific with contrasting environmental characteristics: Yelapa and Isla Espíritu Santo (IES). Five CAUs were collected every 6 months for 2 years. The average calcification rate in Yelapa and IES was 1.04 ± 0.11 kg m−2 year−1 and 1.01 ± 0.82 kg m−2 year−1; no difference in calcification was found between sites (H = 0.13, df = 1, p = 0.71), although significant differences in calcification were found over time (H = 9.13, df = 3, p = 0.03). Barnacles exhibited the highest calcification rate (Yelapa: 0.63 ± 0.8 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1; IES: 0.54 ± 0.6 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1), followed by mollusks (Yelapa: 0.27 ± 0.35, IES: 0.18 ± 0.26 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1), crustose coralline algae (CCA) (Yelapa: 0.025 ± 0.029 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1; IES: 0.08 ± 0.11 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1), and bryozoans (Yelapa: 0.04 ± 0.06 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1; IES: 0.11 ± 0.11 kg CaCO3 m−2 year−1). Cover was dominated by barnacles (27.7%), CCA (16.5%), and mollusks (13.7%) in Yelapa and by bryozoans (27.9%), CCA (20.4%), and barnacles (17.4%) in IES. The coverage of all groups (except CCA) was different between sites, and all taxonomic groups (except foraminifera) exhibited differences over time. The role of each taxonomic group was attributed according to their substrate preference (exposed or cryptic). In Yelapa, bryozoans and polychaetes filled cavities, while CCAs and bryozoans contributed to vertical reef accretion in IES.
期刊介绍:
Marine Ecology publishes original contributions on the structure and dynamics of marine benthic and pelagic ecosystems, communities and populations, and on the critical links between ecology and the evolution of marine organisms.
The journal prioritizes contributions elucidating fundamental aspects of species interaction and adaptation to the environment through integration of information from various organizational levels (molecules to ecosystems) and different disciplines (molecular biology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, marine biology, natural history, geography, oceanography, palaeontology and modelling) as viewed from an ecological perspective. The journal also focuses on population genetic processes, evolution of life histories, morphological traits and behaviour, historical ecology and biogeography, macro-ecology and seascape ecology, palaeo-ecological reconstruction, and ecological changes due to introduction of new biota, human pressure or environmental change.
Most applied marine science, including fisheries biology, aquaculture, natural-products chemistry, toxicology, and local pollution studies lie outside the scope of the journal. Papers should address ecological questions that would be of interest to a worldwide readership of ecologists; papers of mostly local interest, including descriptions of flora and fauna, taxonomic descriptions, and range extensions will not be considered.