逻辑控制课程中混合与在线工程实验的学生体验

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Yihua Zhang, Christian Stöhr, Susanne Strömberg Jämsvi, Jens Kabo, Johan Malmqvist
{"title":"逻辑控制课程中混合与在线工程实验的学生体验","authors":"Yihua Zhang,&nbsp;Christian Stöhr,&nbsp;Susanne Strömberg Jämsvi,&nbsp;Jens Kabo,&nbsp;Johan Malmqvist","doi":"10.1002/cae.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the rapidly evolving landscape of engineering education, the shift toward online and hybrid lab formats requires a critical examination of their impact on students' learning experiences. This study investigates the experiences of 82 students in a logic control course with campus, remote, and simulation labs, through the lens of the Community of Inquiry framework. Although our qualitative thematic analysis confirms students' general preference for campus labs, we extend this observation through nuanced insights into the cognitive, teaching, and social elements of students' perceptions of their learning experiences in the different lab formats. Students appreciate the increased accessibility and flexibility of remote options, while also identifying challenges and limitations for cognitive engagement, instructional support, and social connection. Our results suggest that with targeted improvements, online and hybrid labs can enhance students' learning experience considerably, particularly if integrated purposefully with campus labs. We discuss theoretical and practical key implications for designing blended lab environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Experiences of Hybrid and Online Engineering Labs in a Logic Control Course\",\"authors\":\"Yihua Zhang,&nbsp;Christian Stöhr,&nbsp;Susanne Strömberg Jämsvi,&nbsp;Jens Kabo,&nbsp;Johan Malmqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cae.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the rapidly evolving landscape of engineering education, the shift toward online and hybrid lab formats requires a critical examination of their impact on students' learning experiences. This study investigates the experiences of 82 students in a logic control course with campus, remote, and simulation labs, through the lens of the Community of Inquiry framework. Although our qualitative thematic analysis confirms students' general preference for campus labs, we extend this observation through nuanced insights into the cognitive, teaching, and social elements of students' perceptions of their learning experiences in the different lab formats. Students appreciate the increased accessibility and flexibility of remote options, while also identifying challenges and limitations for cognitive engagement, instructional support, and social connection. Our results suggest that with targeted improvements, online and hybrid labs can enhance students' learning experience considerably, particularly if integrated purposefully with campus labs. We discuss theoretical and practical key implications for designing blended lab environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.70032\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.70032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在快速发展的工程教育环境中,向在线和混合实验室形式的转变需要对其对学生学习体验的影响进行批判性检查。本研究通过探究社区框架的视角,调查了82名学生在校园、远程和模拟实验室的逻辑控制课程中的经历。虽然我们的定性主题分析证实了学生对校园实验室的普遍偏好,但我们通过细致入微的洞察来扩展这一观察,了解学生对不同实验室形式的学习经历的认知、教学和社会因素。学生们欣赏远程选择的可访问性和灵活性,同时也认识到认知参与、教学支持和社会联系方面的挑战和限制。我们的研究结果表明,通过有针对性的改进,在线和混合实验室可以大大提高学生的学习体验,特别是如果有目的地与校园实验室相结合。我们讨论了设计混合实验室环境的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Student Experiences of Hybrid and Online Engineering Labs in a Logic Control Course

Student Experiences of Hybrid and Online Engineering Labs in a Logic Control Course

In the rapidly evolving landscape of engineering education, the shift toward online and hybrid lab formats requires a critical examination of their impact on students' learning experiences. This study investigates the experiences of 82 students in a logic control course with campus, remote, and simulation labs, through the lens of the Community of Inquiry framework. Although our qualitative thematic analysis confirms students' general preference for campus labs, we extend this observation through nuanced insights into the cognitive, teaching, and social elements of students' perceptions of their learning experiences in the different lab formats. Students appreciate the increased accessibility and flexibility of remote options, while also identifying challenges and limitations for cognitive engagement, instructional support, and social connection. Our results suggest that with targeted improvements, online and hybrid labs can enhance students' learning experience considerably, particularly if integrated purposefully with campus labs. We discuss theoretical and practical key implications for designing blended lab environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信