{"title":"关节内注射对单间室膝关节置换术后感染风险和治疗效果的影响:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jiahao Chen, Xiaofeng Zhang, Wanjuan Li, Hongguang Wang, Jiemei Zhang, Hongxian Pan, Junwu Huang, Chi Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05817-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for single-compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, some patients experience lateral compartment pain after UKA. The impact of lateral compartment intra-articular injection on infection risk of the medial prosthesis and therapeutic outcomes in these patients remains controversial.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the impact of lateral compartment intra-articular injection after UKA on the risk of medial prosthetic joint infection, as well as its therapeutic effect on lateral compartment pain and inflammation. We hypothesized that lateral compartment intra-articular injection in patients with post-UKA lateral pain could provide better pain relief and functional outcomes without increasing the risk of medial prosthetic infection.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included patients who experienced lateral compartment pain after UKA at Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received lateral compartment intra-articular injection for pain management (injection group) and those who received only oral medication (control group). The primary outcome was medial prosthetic infection rate within 6 months post-injection. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, knee function, and quality of life.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 249 patients with post-UKA lateral compartment pain were included (144 in the injection group, 105 in the control group). There was no significant difference in medial prosthetic infection rates between the two groups (2.1% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.812). The injection group showed significantly better pain relief (VAS score) and knee function (KSS score) at 1 week and 1 month post-injection (p < 0.05). Quality of life measures (SF- 36) also showed improvements in the injection group at these early time points.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intra-articular injection after UKA does not increase the risk of infection and may provide better short-term pain relief and functional outcomes. These findings support the safety and potential efficacy of this approach in managing apparent lateral knee post-operative pain and enhancing early recovery after UKA. However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and further explore the long-term impact of this intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of intra-articular injection on infection risk and therapeutic effect after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Jiahao Chen, Xiaofeng Zhang, Wanjuan Li, Hongguang Wang, Jiemei Zhang, Hongxian Pan, Junwu Huang, Chi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05817-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for single-compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, some patients experience lateral compartment pain after UKA. The impact of lateral compartment intra-articular injection on infection risk of the medial prosthesis and therapeutic outcomes in these patients remains controversial.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the impact of lateral compartment intra-articular injection after UKA on the risk of medial prosthetic joint infection, as well as its therapeutic effect on lateral compartment pain and inflammation. We hypothesized that lateral compartment intra-articular injection in patients with post-UKA lateral pain could provide better pain relief and functional outcomes without increasing the risk of medial prosthetic infection.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included patients who experienced lateral compartment pain after UKA at Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received lateral compartment intra-articular injection for pain management (injection group) and those who received only oral medication (control group). The primary outcome was medial prosthetic infection rate within 6 months post-injection. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, knee function, and quality of life.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 249 patients with post-UKA lateral compartment pain were included (144 in the injection group, 105 in the control group). There was no significant difference in medial prosthetic infection rates between the two groups (2.1% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.812). The injection group showed significantly better pain relief (VAS score) and knee function (KSS score) at 1 week and 1 month post-injection (p < 0.05). Quality of life measures (SF- 36) also showed improvements in the injection group at these early time points.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intra-articular injection after UKA does not increase the risk of infection and may provide better short-term pain relief and functional outcomes. These findings support the safety and potential efficacy of this approach in managing apparent lateral knee post-operative pain and enhancing early recovery after UKA. However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and further explore the long-term impact of this intervention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05817-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05817-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:单腔室膝关节置换术(UKA)是治疗单腔室膝骨关节炎的有效方法。然而,一些患者在UKA后会出现侧室疼痛。外侧腔室关节内注射对这些患者内侧假体感染风险和治疗结果的影响仍然存在争议。目的评价UKA术后外侧腔室关节内注射对假体内侧关节感染风险的影响,以及对外侧腔室疼痛和炎症的治疗效果。我们假设,对uka后外侧疼痛患者进行外侧腔室关节内注射可以提供更好的疼痛缓解和功能预后,而不会增加内侧假体感染的风险。方法回顾性队列研究纳入2018年1月至2020年12月在上海市第六人民医院金山分院进行的UKA术后发生外侧筋膜间室疼痛的患者。患者分为两组:接受外侧隔室关节内注射治疗疼痛组(注射组)和仅接受口服药物治疗组(对照组)。主要观察指标为注射后6个月内假体内侧感染率。次要结局包括疼痛评分、膝关节功能和生活质量。结果共纳入249例uka后外侧筋膜间室疼痛患者,其中注射组144例,对照组105例。两组假体内侧感染率比较差异无统计学意义(2.1% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.812)。注射组在注射后1周和1个月的疼痛缓解(VAS评分)和膝关节功能(KSS评分)均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。在这些早期时间点,注射组的生活质量测量(SF- 36)也显示出改善。结论UKA术后关节内注射不增加感染风险,可提供较好的短期疼痛缓解和功能预后。这些发现支持了该入路在处理明显外侧膝关节术后疼痛和增强UKA术后早期恢复方面的安全性和潜在有效性。然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些结果,并进一步探索这种干预措施的长期影响。
Impact of intra-articular injection on infection risk and therapeutic effect after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study
Background
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for single-compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, some patients experience lateral compartment pain after UKA. The impact of lateral compartment intra-articular injection on infection risk of the medial prosthesis and therapeutic outcomes in these patients remains controversial.
Objective
This study aims to evaluate the impact of lateral compartment intra-articular injection after UKA on the risk of medial prosthetic joint infection, as well as its therapeutic effect on lateral compartment pain and inflammation. We hypothesized that lateral compartment intra-articular injection in patients with post-UKA lateral pain could provide better pain relief and functional outcomes without increasing the risk of medial prosthetic infection.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included patients who experienced lateral compartment pain after UKA at Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received lateral compartment intra-articular injection for pain management (injection group) and those who received only oral medication (control group). The primary outcome was medial prosthetic infection rate within 6 months post-injection. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, knee function, and quality of life.
Results
A total of 249 patients with post-UKA lateral compartment pain were included (144 in the injection group, 105 in the control group). There was no significant difference in medial prosthetic infection rates between the two groups (2.1% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.812). The injection group showed significantly better pain relief (VAS score) and knee function (KSS score) at 1 week and 1 month post-injection (p < 0.05). Quality of life measures (SF- 36) also showed improvements in the injection group at these early time points.
Conclusion
Intra-articular injection after UKA does not increase the risk of infection and may provide better short-term pain relief and functional outcomes. These findings support the safety and potential efficacy of this approach in managing apparent lateral knee post-operative pain and enhancing early recovery after UKA. However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and further explore the long-term impact of this intervention.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).