原发性外伤性前下肩脱位后肩袖撕裂,40岁或以上患者接受孤立式肩袖修复的功能效果极佳

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Felix Hochberger, Marco-Christopher Rupp, Felix Boenke, Bastian Scheiderer, Sebastian Siebenlist, Lukas N. Muench, Daniel P. Berthold
{"title":"原发性外伤性前下肩脱位后肩袖撕裂,40岁或以上患者接受孤立式肩袖修复的功能效果极佳","authors":"Felix Hochberger,&nbsp;Marco-Christopher Rupp,&nbsp;Felix Boenke,&nbsp;Bastian Scheiderer,&nbsp;Sebastian Siebenlist,&nbsp;Lukas N. Muench,&nbsp;Daniel P. Berthold","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05785-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the functional outcomes of patients over 40 years of age who underwent isolated rotator cuff (RC) repair (RCR) for full-thickness RC tears resulting from a primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation and to compare these outcomes with a control group of patients who underwent RCR for instability-independent RC tears, with a minimum follow-up of two years.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Patients aged 40 years and older were included for RCR following primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation between 01/2012 and 06/2020 with a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients were excluded if they received an additional labral repair or capsular shift. Outcomes were compared to a control group of patients who underwent RCR without history of previous dislocations. Primary outcome measures included passive range of motion (ROM) as well as patient reported outcomes comprising the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Rowe score. Rates of re-dislocation were evaluated as secondary outcomes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-six patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups (<i>n</i> = 18, respectively). Demographic characteristics did not significantly differ (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). At final follow-up, patients affected by instability-related RC tears showed comparable functional outcomes in terms of WOSI (427.2 ± 238.9<sub>instability group (IG)</sub> vs. 431.1 ± 252.1<sub>control group (CG)</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.962) and Rowe (87.5 ± 12.0<sub>IG</sub> vs. 91.1 ± 10.2<sub>CG</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.339) scores as well as in terms of passive ROM (abduction: 88.1 ± 4.6°<sub>IG</sub> vs. 86.7 ± 11.5°<sub>CG</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.637, forward elevation: 87.8 ± 6.2°<sub>IG</sub> vs. 88.3 ± 5.1°<sub>CG</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.772, external rotation: 55.3 ± 10.5°<sub>IG</sub> vs. 50.8 ± 15.3°<sub>CG</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.312, internal rotation: 65.3 ± 8.5<sub>IG</sub> vs. 68.8 ± 4.9<sub>CG</sub>, <i>p</i> = 0.388). No patient experienced a re-dislocation.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients ≥ 40 years who underwent isolated RCR without labral repair or capsular shift for a concurrent RC tear after experiencing a primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation, achieved favorable functional outcomes along with absence of re-dislocations.</p><h3>Study design</h3><p>Retrospective case series; Level of Evidence IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-025-05785-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excellent functional outcomes in patients aged 40 years or older undergoing isolated rotator cuff repair for rotator cuff tears after primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation\",\"authors\":\"Felix Hochberger,&nbsp;Marco-Christopher Rupp,&nbsp;Felix Boenke,&nbsp;Bastian Scheiderer,&nbsp;Sebastian Siebenlist,&nbsp;Lukas N. Muench,&nbsp;Daniel P. Berthold\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05785-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the functional outcomes of patients over 40 years of age who underwent isolated rotator cuff (RC) repair (RCR) for full-thickness RC tears resulting from a primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation and to compare these outcomes with a control group of patients who underwent RCR for instability-independent RC tears, with a minimum follow-up of two years.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Patients aged 40 years and older were included for RCR following primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation between 01/2012 and 06/2020 with a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients were excluded if they received an additional labral repair or capsular shift. Outcomes were compared to a control group of patients who underwent RCR without history of previous dislocations. Primary outcome measures included passive range of motion (ROM) as well as patient reported outcomes comprising the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Rowe score. Rates of re-dislocation were evaluated as secondary outcomes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-six patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups (<i>n</i> = 18, respectively). Demographic characteristics did not significantly differ (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). At final follow-up, patients affected by instability-related RC tears showed comparable functional outcomes in terms of WOSI (427.2 ± 238.9<sub>instability group (IG)</sub> vs. 431.1 ± 252.1<sub>control group (CG)</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.962) and Rowe (87.5 ± 12.0<sub>IG</sub> vs. 91.1 ± 10.2<sub>CG</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.339) scores as well as in terms of passive ROM (abduction: 88.1 ± 4.6°<sub>IG</sub> vs. 86.7 ± 11.5°<sub>CG</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.637, forward elevation: 87.8 ± 6.2°<sub>IG</sub> vs. 88.3 ± 5.1°<sub>CG</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.772, external rotation: 55.3 ± 10.5°<sub>IG</sub> vs. 50.8 ± 15.3°<sub>CG</sub>; <i>p</i> = 0.312, internal rotation: 65.3 ± 8.5<sub>IG</sub> vs. 68.8 ± 4.9<sub>CG</sub>, <i>p</i> = 0.388). No patient experienced a re-dislocation.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients ≥ 40 years who underwent isolated RCR without labral repair or capsular shift for a concurrent RC tear after experiencing a primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation, achieved favorable functional outcomes along with absence of re-dislocations.</p><h3>Study design</h3><p>Retrospective case series; Level of Evidence IV.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-025-05785-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05785-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05785-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究40岁以上的外伤性肩关节前下位脱位致全层肩袖撕裂患者接受孤立式肩袖修复术(RCR)后的功能结局,并将这些结果与不稳定性无关的肩袖撕裂患者接受RCR的对照组进行比较,随访时间至少为两年。材料和方法在2012年1月1日至2020年6月期间,年龄在40岁及以上的患者因原发性外伤性前下肩关节脱位而进行RCR,随访时间至少为2年。如果患者接受了额外的唇部修复或囊移位,则排除在外。结果与没有既往脱位史的RCR患者对照组进行比较。主要结果测量包括被动活动度(ROM)以及患者报告的结果,包括西安大略省肩部不稳定指数(WOSI)和Rowe评分。再脱位率作为次要结果进行评估。结果36例患者入组,分为2组(n = 18)。人口学特征差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。在最终随访中,受不稳定相关RC撕裂影响的患者在WOSI方面的功能结果相当(不稳定组(IG)为427.2±238.9,对照组(CG)为431.1±252.1;p = 0.962)和罗(87.5±12.0搞笑和91.1±10.2 cg;p = 0.339)评分以及被动ROM(外展:88.1±4.6°IG vs 86.7±11.5°CG;p = 0.637,高度:87.8±6.2°搞笑和88.3±5.1°CG;p = 0.772、外部旋转:55.3±10.5°搞笑和50.8±15.3°CG;p = 0.312,内部旋转:65.3±8.5搞笑和68.8±4.9 cg, p = 0.388)。没有患者发生再脱位。结论:≥40岁的患者在经历了原发性外伤性前下位肩关节脱位后,在不进行唇部修复或囊移位的情况下,接受了孤立的RCR治疗,获得了良好的功能结果,并且没有再脱位。研究设计:回顾性病例系列;证据级别IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Excellent functional outcomes in patients aged 40 years or older undergoing isolated rotator cuff repair for rotator cuff tears after primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation

Purpose

To investigate the functional outcomes of patients over 40 years of age who underwent isolated rotator cuff (RC) repair (RCR) for full-thickness RC tears resulting from a primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation and to compare these outcomes with a control group of patients who underwent RCR for instability-independent RC tears, with a minimum follow-up of two years.

Materials and methods

Patients aged 40 years and older were included for RCR following primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation between 01/2012 and 06/2020 with a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients were excluded if they received an additional labral repair or capsular shift. Outcomes were compared to a control group of patients who underwent RCR without history of previous dislocations. Primary outcome measures included passive range of motion (ROM) as well as patient reported outcomes comprising the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Rowe score. Rates of re-dislocation were evaluated as secondary outcomes.

Results

Thirty-six patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups (n = 18, respectively). Demographic characteristics did not significantly differ (p > 0.05). At final follow-up, patients affected by instability-related RC tears showed comparable functional outcomes in terms of WOSI (427.2 ± 238.9instability group (IG) vs. 431.1 ± 252.1control group (CG); p = 0.962) and Rowe (87.5 ± 12.0IG vs. 91.1 ± 10.2CG; p = 0.339) scores as well as in terms of passive ROM (abduction: 88.1 ± 4.6°IG vs. 86.7 ± 11.5°CG; p = 0.637, forward elevation: 87.8 ± 6.2°IG vs. 88.3 ± 5.1°CG; p = 0.772, external rotation: 55.3 ± 10.5°IG vs. 50.8 ± 15.3°CG; p = 0.312, internal rotation: 65.3 ± 8.5IG vs. 68.8 ± 4.9CG, p = 0.388). No patient experienced a re-dislocation.

Conclusion

Patients ≥ 40 years who underwent isolated RCR without labral repair or capsular shift for a concurrent RC tear after experiencing a primary traumatic anteroinferior shoulder dislocation, achieved favorable functional outcomes along with absence of re-dislocations.

Study design

Retrospective case series; Level of Evidence IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信