使用二甲双胍对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后的影响

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Angel Bueno, Andrea Becerril-Gaitan, Collins Mokua, Kristina Ramirez-Garcia, Justin Nguyen, Faris Shaker, Tien Nguyen, Antonio Dono, Spiros Blackburn, Peng Roc Chen, Mark Dannenbaum, H. Alex Choi, Arthur L. Day, Jacques J. Morcos, Ching-Jen Chen
{"title":"使用二甲双胍对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后的影响","authors":"Angel Bueno,&nbsp;Andrea Becerril-Gaitan,&nbsp;Collins Mokua,&nbsp;Kristina Ramirez-Garcia,&nbsp;Justin Nguyen,&nbsp;Faris Shaker,&nbsp;Tien Nguyen,&nbsp;Antonio Dono,&nbsp;Spiros Blackburn,&nbsp;Peng Roc Chen,&nbsp;Mark Dannenbaum,&nbsp;H. Alex Choi,&nbsp;Arthur L. Day,&nbsp;Jacques J. Morcos,&nbsp;Ching-Jen Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06516-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Metformin is widely prescribed and has neuroprotective effects in animals, but its impact on brain injury after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in humans is unclear.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective review assessed patients with aSAH from 2009 to 2023, categorizing them based on pre-admission metformin use. The primary outcome was delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), while secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, rebleeding, angiographic cerebral vasospasm (CVS), and favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge and the 3-month follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression. Sensitivity analysis was performed after excluding patients receiving comfort care.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 900 patients were included (47 metformin and 853 non-metformin). DCI rates were similar between groups (38.3% vs. 29.3%, aOR = 1.06 [0.49–2.28]). Rebleeding rates were 4.3% for metformin users and 5.6% for non-users (aOR = 0.47 [0.09–2.51]). In-hospital mortality was 4.3% in metformin users vs. 9.7% in non-users (aOR = 0.47 [0.08–2.84]). Angiographic CVS was 38.3% in metformin users and 52.8% in non-users (aOR = 0.49 [0.23–1.05]), and at 7 days, CVS was 29.8% vs. 47.6% (aOR = 0.46 [0.21–1.01]). Sensitivity analysis showed similar DCI rates (39.1% vs. 30.9%, aOR = 0.98 [0.45–2.15]) but lower CVS at 7 days for metformin users (aOR = 0.44 [0.20–0.98]).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Metformin use before aSAH did not significantly affect the risk of DCI or CVS. However, after excluding comfort care patients, the findings are highly speculative of reduced CVS risk at 7 days post-aSAH. Rebleeding and mortality rates were similar across groups. Future research with larger, multi-institutional datasets is needed to better understand metformin's impact, particularly during and after aSAH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06516-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of metformin use on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Angel Bueno,&nbsp;Andrea Becerril-Gaitan,&nbsp;Collins Mokua,&nbsp;Kristina Ramirez-Garcia,&nbsp;Justin Nguyen,&nbsp;Faris Shaker,&nbsp;Tien Nguyen,&nbsp;Antonio Dono,&nbsp;Spiros Blackburn,&nbsp;Peng Roc Chen,&nbsp;Mark Dannenbaum,&nbsp;H. Alex Choi,&nbsp;Arthur L. Day,&nbsp;Jacques J. Morcos,&nbsp;Ching-Jen Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-025-06516-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Metformin is widely prescribed and has neuroprotective effects in animals, but its impact on brain injury after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in humans is unclear.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center retrospective review assessed patients with aSAH from 2009 to 2023, categorizing them based on pre-admission metformin use. The primary outcome was delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), while secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, rebleeding, angiographic cerebral vasospasm (CVS), and favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge and the 3-month follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression. Sensitivity analysis was performed after excluding patients receiving comfort care.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 900 patients were included (47 metformin and 853 non-metformin). DCI rates were similar between groups (38.3% vs. 29.3%, aOR = 1.06 [0.49–2.28]). Rebleeding rates were 4.3% for metformin users and 5.6% for non-users (aOR = 0.47 [0.09–2.51]). In-hospital mortality was 4.3% in metformin users vs. 9.7% in non-users (aOR = 0.47 [0.08–2.84]). Angiographic CVS was 38.3% in metformin users and 52.8% in non-users (aOR = 0.49 [0.23–1.05]), and at 7 days, CVS was 29.8% vs. 47.6% (aOR = 0.46 [0.21–1.01]). Sensitivity analysis showed similar DCI rates (39.1% vs. 30.9%, aOR = 0.98 [0.45–2.15]) but lower CVS at 7 days for metformin users (aOR = 0.44 [0.20–0.98]).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Metformin use before aSAH did not significantly affect the risk of DCI or CVS. However, after excluding comfort care patients, the findings are highly speculative of reduced CVS risk at 7 days post-aSAH. Rebleeding and mortality rates were similar across groups. Future research with larger, multi-institutional datasets is needed to better understand metformin's impact, particularly during and after aSAH.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00701-025-06516-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06516-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-025-06516-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二甲双胍被广泛使用,在动物中具有神经保护作用,但其对人类动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后脑损伤的影响尚不清楚。方法本研究对2009 - 2023年aSAH患者进行单中心回顾性评价,根据入院前二甲双胍使用情况对患者进行分类。主要结局是延迟性脑缺血(DCI),次要结局包括院内死亡率、再出血、血管造影脑血管痉挛(CVS)、出院时和3个月随访时良好的修正兰金量表(mRS)评分。结果采用逻辑回归分析。在排除接受舒适护理的患者后进行敏感性分析。结果共纳入900例患者,其中二甲双胍47例,非二甲双胍853例。两组间DCI率相似(38.3% vs 29.3%, aOR = 1.06[0.49-2.28])。二甲双胍服用者再出血率为4.3%,未服用者为5.6% (aOR = 0.47[0.09-2.51])。二甲双胍服用者的住院死亡率为4.3%,非服用者为9.7% (aOR = 0.47[0.08-2.84])。二甲双胍使用者血管造影CVS为38.3%,非二甲双胍使用者血管造影CVS为52.8% (aOR = 0.49[0.23-1.05]),第7天血管造影CVS为29.8% vs. 47.6% (aOR = 0.46[0.21-1.01])。敏感性分析显示,DCI率相似(39.1% vs. 30.9%, aOR = 0.98[0.45-2.15]),但二甲双胍使用者7天的CVS较低(aOR = 0.44[0.20-0.98])。结论aSAH前使用二甲双胍对DCI和CVS风险无显著影响。然而,在排除舒适护理患者后,研究结果高度推测asah后7天CVS风险降低。各组再出血和死亡率相似。未来的研究需要更大的、多机构的数据集来更好地了解二甲双胍的影响,特别是在aSAH期间和之后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of metformin use on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes

Background

Metformin is widely prescribed and has neuroprotective effects in animals, but its impact on brain injury after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in humans is unclear.

Methods

This single-center retrospective review assessed patients with aSAH from 2009 to 2023, categorizing them based on pre-admission metformin use. The primary outcome was delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), while secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, rebleeding, angiographic cerebral vasospasm (CVS), and favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge and the 3-month follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression. Sensitivity analysis was performed after excluding patients receiving comfort care.

Results

A total of 900 patients were included (47 metformin and 853 non-metformin). DCI rates were similar between groups (38.3% vs. 29.3%, aOR = 1.06 [0.49–2.28]). Rebleeding rates were 4.3% for metformin users and 5.6% for non-users (aOR = 0.47 [0.09–2.51]). In-hospital mortality was 4.3% in metformin users vs. 9.7% in non-users (aOR = 0.47 [0.08–2.84]). Angiographic CVS was 38.3% in metformin users and 52.8% in non-users (aOR = 0.49 [0.23–1.05]), and at 7 days, CVS was 29.8% vs. 47.6% (aOR = 0.46 [0.21–1.01]). Sensitivity analysis showed similar DCI rates (39.1% vs. 30.9%, aOR = 0.98 [0.45–2.15]) but lower CVS at 7 days for metformin users (aOR = 0.44 [0.20–0.98]).

Conclusion

Metformin use before aSAH did not significantly affect the risk of DCI or CVS. However, after excluding comfort care patients, the findings are highly speculative of reduced CVS risk at 7 days post-aSAH. Rebleeding and mortality rates were similar across groups. Future research with larger, multi-institutional datasets is needed to better understand metformin's impact, particularly during and after aSAH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信