护士和护理学生对他们在伤口感染管理方面的知识和满意度的看法。调查

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Javier Sánchez-Gálvez , Míriam Sánchez-Hernández , Eva Vegue-Parra , José María Rumbo-Prieto , Daniel Fernández-García , Santiago Martínez-Isasi
{"title":"护士和护理学生对他们在伤口感染管理方面的知识和满意度的看法。调查","authors":"Javier Sánchez-Gálvez ,&nbsp;Míriam Sánchez-Hernández ,&nbsp;Eva Vegue-Parra ,&nbsp;José María Rumbo-Prieto ,&nbsp;Daniel Fernández-García ,&nbsp;Santiago Martínez-Isasi","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2024.502165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze the perception and satisfaction of nurses and nursing students regarding their knowledge of the clinical management of infected wounds in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an ad hoc questionnaire with 18 questions on knowledge of infected wounds, divided into three sections, and was distributed electronically to nurses and nursing students over a two-month period. The questionnaire was piloted with a group of nurses and students, and data were collected anonymously and voluntarily.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 520 completed questionnaires were collected, including 158 from professionals and 362 from students. Professionals demonstrated a significantly higher average knowledge score than students (4.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.13 vs 3.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.09; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). Students performed worse in questions related to biofilm and assessment of subtle and manifest signs of infection in wounds. Specifically, only 45% of students correctly identified the role of bacterial biofilm in wound infections. Significant differences were observed in various items (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05) favoring non-clinical professionals over clinical professionals, particularly regarding biofilm and the use of topical antiseptics. Overall, professionals expressed significant satisfaction with their knowledge compared to students (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nursing professionals, especially those with teaching, research, and/or managerial roles, demonstrate a greater perception of knowledge in specific areas. However, both professionals and students exhibit gaps in perceived knowledge regarding the management of wound infections, highlighting the importance of continuous education and the review of teaching strategies to address these deficiencies. Implementing a specific mandatory subject is suggested to ensure the quality of nursing education in this area from undergraduate level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 502165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percepciones de enfermeras y estudiantes de Enfermería sobre su conocimiento y satisfacción en el manejo de infecciones en heridas. Estudio transversal\",\"authors\":\"Javier Sánchez-Gálvez ,&nbsp;Míriam Sánchez-Hernández ,&nbsp;Eva Vegue-Parra ,&nbsp;José María Rumbo-Prieto ,&nbsp;Daniel Fernández-García ,&nbsp;Santiago Martínez-Isasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfcli.2024.502165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze the perception and satisfaction of nurses and nursing students regarding their knowledge of the clinical management of infected wounds in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an ad hoc questionnaire with 18 questions on knowledge of infected wounds, divided into three sections, and was distributed electronically to nurses and nursing students over a two-month period. The questionnaire was piloted with a group of nurses and students, and data were collected anonymously and voluntarily.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 520 completed questionnaires were collected, including 158 from professionals and 362 from students. Professionals demonstrated a significantly higher average knowledge score than students (4.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.13 vs 3.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.09; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). Students performed worse in questions related to biofilm and assessment of subtle and manifest signs of infection in wounds. Specifically, only 45% of students correctly identified the role of bacterial biofilm in wound infections. Significant differences were observed in various items (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05) favoring non-clinical professionals over clinical professionals, particularly regarding biofilm and the use of topical antiseptics. Overall, professionals expressed significant satisfaction with their knowledge compared to students (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Nursing professionals, especially those with teaching, research, and/or managerial roles, demonstrate a greater perception of knowledge in specific areas. However, both professionals and students exhibit gaps in perceived knowledge regarding the management of wound infections, highlighting the importance of continuous education and the review of teaching strategies to address these deficiencies. Implementing a specific mandatory subject is suggested to ensure the quality of nursing education in this area from undergraduate level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Clinica\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 502165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113086212400158X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S113086212400158X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析西班牙护士和护生对感染伤口临床管理知识的认知及满意度。方法采用一份特设调查问卷进行横断面描述性研究,问卷共18个问题,分为三个部分,在两个月的时间内以电子方式发放给护士和护生。问卷调查是在一组护士和学生中试行的,数据是匿名和自愿收集的。结果共收集问卷520份,其中专业人员158份,学生362份。专业人员的平均知识得分显著高于学生(4.7±0.13比3.8±0.09);P & lt;措施)。学生在与生物膜和评估伤口感染的细微和明显迹象有关的问题上表现更差。具体来说,只有45%的学生正确识别了细菌生物膜在伤口感染中的作用。在各个项目上观察到显著差异(P <;(0.05)与临床专业人员相比,更倾向于非临床专业人员,特别是在生物膜和局部防腐剂的使用方面。总体而言,与学生相比,专业人士对自己的知识表达了显著的满意度(P <;. 05)。结论护理专业人员,特别是那些从事教学、研究和/或管理工作的护理专业人员,在特定领域表现出更强的知识感知能力。然而,专业人员和学生在伤口感染管理的认知知识方面都存在差距,这突出了继续教育和审查教学策略以解决这些缺陷的重要性。建议实施特定的必修科目,以确保该地区从本科阶段开始的护理教育质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percepciones de enfermeras y estudiantes de Enfermería sobre su conocimiento y satisfacción en el manejo de infecciones en heridas. Estudio transversal

Objective

To analyze the perception and satisfaction of nurses and nursing students regarding their knowledge of the clinical management of infected wounds in Spain.

Methods

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an ad hoc questionnaire with 18 questions on knowledge of infected wounds, divided into three sections, and was distributed electronically to nurses and nursing students over a two-month period. The questionnaire was piloted with a group of nurses and students, and data were collected anonymously and voluntarily.

Results

A total of 520 completed questionnaires were collected, including 158 from professionals and 362 from students. Professionals demonstrated a significantly higher average knowledge score than students (4.7 ± 0.13 vs 3.8 ± 0.09; P < .001). Students performed worse in questions related to biofilm and assessment of subtle and manifest signs of infection in wounds. Specifically, only 45% of students correctly identified the role of bacterial biofilm in wound infections. Significant differences were observed in various items (P < .05) favoring non-clinical professionals over clinical professionals, particularly regarding biofilm and the use of topical antiseptics. Overall, professionals expressed significant satisfaction with their knowledge compared to students (P < .05).

Conclusion

Nursing professionals, especially those with teaching, research, and/or managerial roles, demonstrate a greater perception of knowledge in specific areas. However, both professionals and students exhibit gaps in perceived knowledge regarding the management of wound infections, highlighting the importance of continuous education and the review of teaching strategies to address these deficiencies. Implementing a specific mandatory subject is suggested to ensure the quality of nursing education in this area from undergraduate level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信