Dennis J Hazelett
{"title":"Rethinking GWAS: how lessons from genetic screens and artificial intelligence could reveal biological mechanisms.","authors":"Dennis J Hazelett","doi":"10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Motivation: </strong>Modern single-cell omics data are key to unraveling the complex mechanisms underlying risk for complex diseases revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Phenotypic screens in model organisms have several important parallels to GWAS which I explore in this essay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>I provide the historical context of such screens, comparing and contrasting similarities to association studies, and how these screens in model organisms can teach us what to look for. Then I consider how the results of GWAS might be exhaustively interrogated to interpret the biological mechanisms underpinning disease processes. Finally, I propose a general framework for tackling this problem computationally, and explore the data, mechanisms, and technology (both existing and yet to be invented) that are necessary to complete the task.</p><p><strong>Availability and implementation: </strong>There are no data or code associated with this article.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":93899,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动机全基因组关联研究(GWAS)揭示了复杂疾病风险的复杂机制,而现代单细胞组学数据是揭示这些风险的关键。模式生物的表型筛选与全基因组关联研究(GWAS)有几个重要的相似之处,我将在这篇文章中探讨这些相似之处:结果:我介绍了此类筛选的历史背景,比较了与关联研究的相似之处,以及模型生物中的这些筛选如何教会我们寻找什么。然后,我将考虑如何详尽地分析 GWAS 的结果,以解释疾病过程的生物学机制。最后,我提出了一个通过计算解决这一问题的总体框架,并探讨了完成这一任务所需的数据、机制和技术(包括现有的和有待发明的):本文无相关数据或代码:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking GWAS: how lessons from genetic screens and artificial intelligence could reveal biological mechanisms.

Motivation: Modern single-cell omics data are key to unraveling the complex mechanisms underlying risk for complex diseases revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Phenotypic screens in model organisms have several important parallels to GWAS which I explore in this essay.

Results: I provide the historical context of such screens, comparing and contrasting similarities to association studies, and how these screens in model organisms can teach us what to look for. Then I consider how the results of GWAS might be exhaustively interrogated to interpret the biological mechanisms underpinning disease processes. Finally, I propose a general framework for tackling this problem computationally, and explore the data, mechanisms, and technology (both existing and yet to be invented) that are necessary to complete the task.

Availability and implementation: There are no data or code associated with this article.

Supplementary information: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信