Callie K VanWinkle, Whitney Fu, Kristen P Hassett, Michael P Thompson, Rishindra M Reddy, Kiran Lagisetty, Sidra N Bonner
{"title":"肺癌手术中参与高质量合作与价值的关系。","authors":"Callie K VanWinkle, Whitney Fu, Kristen P Hassett, Michael P Thompson, Rishindra M Reddy, Kiran Lagisetty, Sidra N Bonner","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.02.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, the association between participation in a statewide thoracic surgery collaborative quality initiative (CQI) and value for resection of lung cancer is evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Robust multipayer claims data from the Michigan Value Collaborative, a quality initiative with the goal of improving health care value and quality across Michigan, were leveraged to identify patients undergoing lung cancer resection at Michigan hospitals from 2015 to 2020. We identified patients who did and did not receive their care at a hospital participating in a statewide thoracic surgery CQI. There were 16 CQI hospitals and 38 non-CQI hospitals identified at which patients underwent resection for lung cancer. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to compare surgical outcomes and total surgical episodes for patients receiving care within the CQI compared with those outside of the CQI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4857 patients undergoing resection for lung cancer were identified, with mean (SD) age of 68.3 (8.6) years; 2599 (53.5%) were women. Patients receiving surgery within CQI hospitals had significantly lower mortality compared with patients at non-CQI hospitals (1.5% vs 2.6%; P < .04). A similar pattern was found for all complications (48.4% vs 60.6%; P < .001) and for specific complications, including acute respiratory failure (11.1% vs 25.5%; P < .001), pneumonia (6.4% vs 10.1%; P < .001), pneumothorax (20.3% vs 25.3%; P < .001), and renal failure (5.9% vs 9.3%; P < .001). Last, CQI hospitals had significantly lower mean 30-day total surgical episode payments ($26,470.42 vs $28,561.56; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found association between participation in a CQI and improved value in lung cancer surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Participation in a Quality Collaborative and Value in Lung Cancer Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Callie K VanWinkle, Whitney Fu, Kristen P Hassett, Michael P Thompson, Rishindra M Reddy, Kiran Lagisetty, Sidra N Bonner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.02.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, the association between participation in a statewide thoracic surgery collaborative quality initiative (CQI) and value for resection of lung cancer is evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Robust multipayer claims data from the Michigan Value Collaborative, a quality initiative with the goal of improving health care value and quality across Michigan, were leveraged to identify patients undergoing lung cancer resection at Michigan hospitals from 2015 to 2020. We identified patients who did and did not receive their care at a hospital participating in a statewide thoracic surgery CQI. There were 16 CQI hospitals and 38 non-CQI hospitals identified at which patients underwent resection for lung cancer. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to compare surgical outcomes and total surgical episodes for patients receiving care within the CQI compared with those outside of the CQI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4857 patients undergoing resection for lung cancer were identified, with mean (SD) age of 68.3 (8.6) years; 2599 (53.5%) were women. Patients receiving surgery within CQI hospitals had significantly lower mortality compared with patients at non-CQI hospitals (1.5% vs 2.6%; P < .04). A similar pattern was found for all complications (48.4% vs 60.6%; P < .001) and for specific complications, including acute respiratory failure (11.1% vs 25.5%; P < .001), pneumonia (6.4% vs 10.1%; P < .001), pneumothorax (20.3% vs 25.3%; P < .001), and renal failure (5.9% vs 9.3%; P < .001). Last, CQI hospitals had significantly lower mean 30-day total surgical episode payments ($26,470.42 vs $28,561.56; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found association between participation in a CQI and improved value in lung cancer surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.02.027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.02.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在本研究中,评估参与全州胸外科质量协作倡议(CQI)与肺癌切除价值之间的关系。方法:数据来自密歇根价值协作,这是一项质量倡议,旨在通过利用强大的多付款人索赔数据来识别2015-2020年在密歇根州医院接受肺癌切除术的患者,从而提高密歇根州的医疗保健价值和质量。我们确定了在参加全州胸外科CQI的医院接受治疗和未接受治疗的患者。有16家CQI医院和38家非CQI医院确定患者接受了肺癌切除术。采用多变量logistic和线性回归来比较在CQI范围内接受治疗的患者与在CQI范围外接受治疗的患者的手术结果和总手术次数。结果:总体而言,总共有4,857名接受肺癌切除术的患者,患者平均(SD)年龄为68.3(8.6),其中2,599名女性(53.5%)。与非CQI医院的患者相比,在CQI医院接受手术的患者死亡率显著降低(1.5% vs. 2.6%;结论:本研究发现参与协作质量倡议与肺癌手术价值的提高之间存在关联。
Association Between Participation in a Quality Collaborative and Value in Lung Cancer Surgery.
Background: In this study, the association between participation in a statewide thoracic surgery collaborative quality initiative (CQI) and value for resection of lung cancer is evaluated.
Methods: Robust multipayer claims data from the Michigan Value Collaborative, a quality initiative with the goal of improving health care value and quality across Michigan, were leveraged to identify patients undergoing lung cancer resection at Michigan hospitals from 2015 to 2020. We identified patients who did and did not receive their care at a hospital participating in a statewide thoracic surgery CQI. There were 16 CQI hospitals and 38 non-CQI hospitals identified at which patients underwent resection for lung cancer. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to compare surgical outcomes and total surgical episodes for patients receiving care within the CQI compared with those outside of the CQI.
Results: A total of 4857 patients undergoing resection for lung cancer were identified, with mean (SD) age of 68.3 (8.6) years; 2599 (53.5%) were women. Patients receiving surgery within CQI hospitals had significantly lower mortality compared with patients at non-CQI hospitals (1.5% vs 2.6%; P < .04). A similar pattern was found for all complications (48.4% vs 60.6%; P < .001) and for specific complications, including acute respiratory failure (11.1% vs 25.5%; P < .001), pneumonia (6.4% vs 10.1%; P < .001), pneumothorax (20.3% vs 25.3%; P < .001), and renal failure (5.9% vs 9.3%; P < .001). Last, CQI hospitals had significantly lower mean 30-day total surgical episode payments ($26,470.42 vs $28,561.56; P < .001).
Conclusions: This study found association between participation in a CQI and improved value in lung cancer surgery.
期刊介绍:
The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features:
• Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques
• New Technology articles
• Case reports
• "How-to-do-it" features
• Reviews of current literature
• Supplements on symposia
• Commentary pieces and correspondence
• CME
• Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery.
An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.